DISTINGUISHING AND ANALYTICAL CONFRONTATION IN THE SPECIAL APPEAL BASED IN DIVERGENCE OF PRECEDENTS
This paper has as its theme the analysis of the distinguishing and analytical confrontation in the appropriateness hypothesis of the special appeal by divergence between precedents of courts. The general objective is the study of the techniques of distinguishing and analytical confrontation that jus...
Main Author: | Rodrigo Pereira Moreira |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
2021-04-01
|
Series: | Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/article/view/54174/36336 |
Similar Items
-
THE “STATE OF THE ART” OF THE CLAIM IN THE STF AND STJ:IS SCHRÖDINGER'S CAT ALIVE-DEAD?
by: Júlio César Rossi, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01) -
ARGUMENTATIVE UTILITY OF THE JUDICIAL PRECEDENT AS A FOUNDATION FOR THE INTEGRATION OF JUDICIAL DECISIONS
by: Rodrigo Valente Giublin Teixeira, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01) -
Review of a Monograf by V.N. Safonov «Constitutional Law-Making in the US Suprime Court Activity. Historical-Legal Reaserch». Moscow: Prospect Publ., 2018
by: Marina V Nemytina
Published: (2018-12-01) -
AGREEMENTS ON ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF SETTLEMENT OF THE CONFLICTS: CHARACTERISTIC OF MAIN TYPES AND PREREQUISITES OF THEIR DEMAND
by: Irina A Stepanova
Published: (2018-12-01) -
The South African Constitutional Court's Use Of Foreign Precedent In Matters Of Religion: Without Fear Or Favour?
by: Christa Rautenbach
Published: (2015-12-01)