Tutor-demonstrated feedback in the mini-clinical evaluation exercise

Introduction: The mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX) allows for assessment and subsequent feedback across a range of individual clinical cases, although much of what is assessed is left implicit. After the performance by a trainee, further observation of appropriate clinical performance by...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Madhur Bhattarai, Sean McAleer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE) 2020-06-01
Series:MedEdPublish
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mededpublish.org/Manuscripts/3005
id doaj-540376d5df114c0ea10b5f5e753746a8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-540376d5df114c0ea10b5f5e753746a82020-11-25T04:08:39ZengAssociation for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE)MedEdPublish2312-79962020-06-0191Tutor-demonstrated feedback in the mini-clinical evaluation exerciseMadhur Bhattarai0Sean McAleer1Chitwan Medical CollegeCentre for Medical Education, University of Dundee, ScotlandIntroduction: The mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX) allows for assessment and subsequent feedback across a range of individual clinical cases, although much of what is assessed is left implicit. After the performance by a trainee, further observation of appropriate clinical performance by the tutor provides a strong standard of reference for effective learning. Methods: In each mini-CEX encounter one final year resident clinically assessed an unfamiliar patient in the presence of peers and a tutor. The tutor then demonstrated the appropriate clinical behaviour. Twelve peers rated the performance of the resident before and after the tutor-demonstrated feedback (TDF). The encounters with the first cases by each of the participants were completed one by one and the cycles of encounters with the next cases by each resident were similarly continued. Results: All 13 participants completed six mini-CEX encounters over one year with an overall response rate of 95% for peer-assessment ratings (PARs). There was a total of 1772 PAR forms each with seven parameters and 1772 peer-satisfaction rating (PSR). Reliability coefficients of PARs ranged from .77 to .93. The PARs decreased significantly in each of the six cases after TDF (p<0.001). Peers rated the performance more negatively after the TDF than before the TDF. The mean PSRs, however, increased significantly in each of the six cases after the TDF (p<0.05). The mean observation time of participants' performance decreased from 26 minutes in the initial two cases to 14.5 in the last two (p<0.001). Conclusion: The feasibility and the positive educational impact of the TDF were shown in our exploratory study. The novel concept of TDF in the mini-CEX as supervised learning events and formative assessment deserves further investigation. https://www.mededpublish.org/Manuscripts/3005Assessmentfeedbackfeedforwardlearning by observationlearning for assessmentmini-CEX
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Madhur Bhattarai
Sean McAleer
spellingShingle Madhur Bhattarai
Sean McAleer
Tutor-demonstrated feedback in the mini-clinical evaluation exercise
MedEdPublish
Assessment
feedback
feedforward
learning by observation
learning for assessment
mini-CEX
author_facet Madhur Bhattarai
Sean McAleer
author_sort Madhur Bhattarai
title Tutor-demonstrated feedback in the mini-clinical evaluation exercise
title_short Tutor-demonstrated feedback in the mini-clinical evaluation exercise
title_full Tutor-demonstrated feedback in the mini-clinical evaluation exercise
title_fullStr Tutor-demonstrated feedback in the mini-clinical evaluation exercise
title_full_unstemmed Tutor-demonstrated feedback in the mini-clinical evaluation exercise
title_sort tutor-demonstrated feedback in the mini-clinical evaluation exercise
publisher Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE)
series MedEdPublish
issn 2312-7996
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Introduction: The mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX) allows for assessment and subsequent feedback across a range of individual clinical cases, although much of what is assessed is left implicit. After the performance by a trainee, further observation of appropriate clinical performance by the tutor provides a strong standard of reference for effective learning. Methods: In each mini-CEX encounter one final year resident clinically assessed an unfamiliar patient in the presence of peers and a tutor. The tutor then demonstrated the appropriate clinical behaviour. Twelve peers rated the performance of the resident before and after the tutor-demonstrated feedback (TDF). The encounters with the first cases by each of the participants were completed one by one and the cycles of encounters with the next cases by each resident were similarly continued. Results: All 13 participants completed six mini-CEX encounters over one year with an overall response rate of 95% for peer-assessment ratings (PARs). There was a total of 1772 PAR forms each with seven parameters and 1772 peer-satisfaction rating (PSR). Reliability coefficients of PARs ranged from .77 to .93. The PARs decreased significantly in each of the six cases after TDF (p<0.001). Peers rated the performance more negatively after the TDF than before the TDF. The mean PSRs, however, increased significantly in each of the six cases after the TDF (p<0.05). The mean observation time of participants' performance decreased from 26 minutes in the initial two cases to 14.5 in the last two (p<0.001). Conclusion: The feasibility and the positive educational impact of the TDF were shown in our exploratory study. The novel concept of TDF in the mini-CEX as supervised learning events and formative assessment deserves further investigation.
topic Assessment
feedback
feedforward
learning by observation
learning for assessment
mini-CEX
url https://www.mededpublish.org/Manuscripts/3005
work_keys_str_mv AT madhurbhattarai tutordemonstratedfeedbackintheminiclinicalevaluationexercise
AT seanmcaleer tutordemonstratedfeedbackintheminiclinicalevaluationexercise
_version_ 1724424704383516672