Internalism as Methodology
This paper scrutinizes the recent proposal made by Lassiter (2008) that the dichotomy between Chomskyan internalism and Dummett-type externalism is misguided and should be overcome by an approach that incorporates sociolinguistic concepts such as speakers’ dispositions to defer. We argue that Lassit...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Biolinguistics
2009-10-01
|
Series: | Biolinguistics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://biolinguistics.eu/index.php/biolinguistics/article/view/92 |
id |
doaj-53f4154c60014e29b24943a8d1263401 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-53f4154c60014e29b24943a8d12634012020-11-25T00:36:36ZengBiolinguisticsBiolinguistics1450-34172009-10-013432133179Internalism as MethodologyTerje Lohndal0Hiroki Narita1University of MarylandHarvard UniversityThis paper scrutinizes the recent proposal made by Lassiter (2008) that the dichotomy between Chomskyan internalism and Dummett-type externalism is misguided and should be overcome by an approach that incorporates sociolinguistic concepts such as speakers’ dispositions to defer. We argue that Lassiter’s arguments are flawed and based on a serious misunder-standing of the internalist approach to the study of natural language, failing to appreciate its methodological nature and conclude that Lassiter’s socio-linguistic approach is just another instance of externalist attempts with little hope of scientific achievement.http://biolinguistics.eu/index.php/biolinguistics/article/view/92externalisminternalismsociolinguistics |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Terje Lohndal Hiroki Narita |
spellingShingle |
Terje Lohndal Hiroki Narita Internalism as Methodology Biolinguistics externalism internalism sociolinguistics |
author_facet |
Terje Lohndal Hiroki Narita |
author_sort |
Terje Lohndal |
title |
Internalism as Methodology |
title_short |
Internalism as Methodology |
title_full |
Internalism as Methodology |
title_fullStr |
Internalism as Methodology |
title_full_unstemmed |
Internalism as Methodology |
title_sort |
internalism as methodology |
publisher |
Biolinguistics |
series |
Biolinguistics |
issn |
1450-3417 |
publishDate |
2009-10-01 |
description |
This paper scrutinizes the recent proposal made by Lassiter (2008) that the dichotomy between Chomskyan internalism and Dummett-type externalism is misguided and should be overcome by an approach that incorporates sociolinguistic concepts such as speakers’ dispositions to defer. We argue that Lassiter’s arguments are flawed and based on a serious misunder-standing of the internalist approach to the study of natural language, failing to appreciate its methodological nature and conclude that Lassiter’s socio-linguistic approach is just another instance of externalist attempts with little hope of scientific achievement. |
topic |
externalism internalism sociolinguistics |
url |
http://biolinguistics.eu/index.php/biolinguistics/article/view/92 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT terjelohndal internalismasmethodology AT hirokinarita internalismasmethodology |
_version_ |
1725304578796158976 |