A note on the Baltic future participle
The lack of fit between the finite forms (Lith. 3 <em>duõs</em>, 1 pl. <em>dúosime</em>, etc.) and the participle (Lith. <em>dúosiant</em>-, cf. Sl. <em>byšǫšt</em>-) of the Baltic future (going back to two PIE desiderative types: athematic and *‑<e...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Vilnius University
2012-09-01
|
Series: | Baltistica |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.baltistica.lt/index.php/baltistica/article/view/2131 |
id |
doaj-53bc2d9c5eef40ef8d11952f8cdae24e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-53bc2d9c5eef40ef8d11952f8cdae24e2020-11-24T21:05:15ZdeuVilnius UniversityBaltistica0132-65032345-00452012-09-01471152110.15388/baltistica.47.1.21312021A note on the Baltic future participleMiguel Villanueva SvenssonThe lack of fit between the finite forms (Lith. 3 <em>duõs</em>, 1 pl. <em>dúosime</em>, etc.) and the participle (Lith. <em>dúosiant</em>-, cf. Sl. <em>byšǫšt</em>-) of the Baltic future (going back to two PIE desiderative types: athematic and *‑<em>se/o</em>‑) can be explained as follows: since the future participle is a form of very modest occurrence, it could be generalized from some verbs with an inherited <em>se/o</em>‑desiderative („to be“, „to come“, „to die“, etc.) whose participle was of relatively frequent use.http://www.baltistica.lt/index.php/baltistica/article/view/2131Baltichistorical morphologyfuture participleverbal morphology |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Miguel Villanueva Svensson |
spellingShingle |
Miguel Villanueva Svensson A note on the Baltic future participle Baltistica Baltic historical morphology future participle verbal morphology |
author_facet |
Miguel Villanueva Svensson |
author_sort |
Miguel Villanueva Svensson |
title |
A note on the Baltic future participle |
title_short |
A note on the Baltic future participle |
title_full |
A note on the Baltic future participle |
title_fullStr |
A note on the Baltic future participle |
title_full_unstemmed |
A note on the Baltic future participle |
title_sort |
note on the baltic future participle |
publisher |
Vilnius University |
series |
Baltistica |
issn |
0132-6503 2345-0045 |
publishDate |
2012-09-01 |
description |
The lack of fit between the finite forms (Lith. 3 <em>duõs</em>, 1 pl. <em>dúosime</em>, etc.) and the participle (Lith. <em>dúosiant</em>-, cf. Sl. <em>byšǫšt</em>-) of the Baltic future (going back to two PIE desiderative types: athematic and *‑<em>se/o</em>‑) can be explained as follows: since the future participle is a form of very modest occurrence, it could be generalized from some verbs with an inherited <em>se/o</em>‑desiderative („to be“, „to come“, „to die“, etc.) whose participle was of relatively frequent use. |
topic |
Baltic historical morphology future participle verbal morphology |
url |
http://www.baltistica.lt/index.php/baltistica/article/view/2131 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT miguelvillanuevasvensson anoteonthebalticfutureparticiple AT miguelvillanuevasvensson noteonthebalticfutureparticiple |
_version_ |
1716769434824081408 |