Assessment and verification of commercially available pressure cookers for laboratory sterilization.

Laboratory science requires careful maintenance of sterile reagents and tools as well as the sterilization of waste prior to disposal. However, steam autoclaves typically used for this purpose may not be readily accessible to everyone in the scientific community, such as K-12 teachers, researchers i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vaille A Swenson, Amanda D Stacy, Michael O Gaylor, Blake Ushijima, Benjamin Philmus, Loralyn M Cozy, Nina M Videau, Patrick Videau
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208769
id doaj-53a0788e470b401ca570cae0b2f5576a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-53a0788e470b401ca570cae0b2f5576a2021-03-03T21:03:19ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-011312e020876910.1371/journal.pone.0208769Assessment and verification of commercially available pressure cookers for laboratory sterilization.Vaille A SwensonAmanda D StacyMichael O GaylorBlake UshijimaBenjamin PhilmusLoralyn M CozyNina M VideauPatrick VideauLaboratory science requires careful maintenance of sterile reagents and tools as well as the sterilization of waste prior to disposal. However, steam autoclaves typically used for this purpose may not be readily accessible to everyone in the scientific community, such as K-12 teachers, researchers in the field, students in under-funded laboratories, or persons in the developing world who lack funding and resources. This work examines the use of commercial electric pressure cookers as an alternative method for the sterilization of media, instruments, and waste. Four commonly available brands of pressure cooker were tested for their ability to sterilize microbiological media, a variety of metal instruments, and high-titer microbial cultures. All four pressure cookers were able to sterilize these starting materials as well as a range of microbial types, including Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, filamentous fungi, unicellular fungi, and mixed environmental samples. Only the Instant Pot, however, was able to sterilize autoclave tester ampoules of Geobacillus stearothermophilus spores. These results suggest that, depending on the nature of the work undertaken, store-bought pressure cookers can be an appropriate substitute for commercial autoclaves. Their adoption may also help increase the accessibility of science to a broader range of investigators.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208769
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vaille A Swenson
Amanda D Stacy
Michael O Gaylor
Blake Ushijima
Benjamin Philmus
Loralyn M Cozy
Nina M Videau
Patrick Videau
spellingShingle Vaille A Swenson
Amanda D Stacy
Michael O Gaylor
Blake Ushijima
Benjamin Philmus
Loralyn M Cozy
Nina M Videau
Patrick Videau
Assessment and verification of commercially available pressure cookers for laboratory sterilization.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Vaille A Swenson
Amanda D Stacy
Michael O Gaylor
Blake Ushijima
Benjamin Philmus
Loralyn M Cozy
Nina M Videau
Patrick Videau
author_sort Vaille A Swenson
title Assessment and verification of commercially available pressure cookers for laboratory sterilization.
title_short Assessment and verification of commercially available pressure cookers for laboratory sterilization.
title_full Assessment and verification of commercially available pressure cookers for laboratory sterilization.
title_fullStr Assessment and verification of commercially available pressure cookers for laboratory sterilization.
title_full_unstemmed Assessment and verification of commercially available pressure cookers for laboratory sterilization.
title_sort assessment and verification of commercially available pressure cookers for laboratory sterilization.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Laboratory science requires careful maintenance of sterile reagents and tools as well as the sterilization of waste prior to disposal. However, steam autoclaves typically used for this purpose may not be readily accessible to everyone in the scientific community, such as K-12 teachers, researchers in the field, students in under-funded laboratories, or persons in the developing world who lack funding and resources. This work examines the use of commercial electric pressure cookers as an alternative method for the sterilization of media, instruments, and waste. Four commonly available brands of pressure cooker were tested for their ability to sterilize microbiological media, a variety of metal instruments, and high-titer microbial cultures. All four pressure cookers were able to sterilize these starting materials as well as a range of microbial types, including Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, filamentous fungi, unicellular fungi, and mixed environmental samples. Only the Instant Pot, however, was able to sterilize autoclave tester ampoules of Geobacillus stearothermophilus spores. These results suggest that, depending on the nature of the work undertaken, store-bought pressure cookers can be an appropriate substitute for commercial autoclaves. Their adoption may also help increase the accessibility of science to a broader range of investigators.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208769
work_keys_str_mv AT vailleaswenson assessmentandverificationofcommerciallyavailablepressurecookersforlaboratorysterilization
AT amandadstacy assessmentandverificationofcommerciallyavailablepressurecookersforlaboratorysterilization
AT michaelogaylor assessmentandverificationofcommerciallyavailablepressurecookersforlaboratorysterilization
AT blakeushijima assessmentandverificationofcommerciallyavailablepressurecookersforlaboratorysterilization
AT benjaminphilmus assessmentandverificationofcommerciallyavailablepressurecookersforlaboratorysterilization
AT loralynmcozy assessmentandverificationofcommerciallyavailablepressurecookersforlaboratorysterilization
AT ninamvideau assessmentandverificationofcommerciallyavailablepressurecookersforlaboratorysterilization
AT patrickvideau assessmentandverificationofcommerciallyavailablepressurecookersforlaboratorysterilization
_version_ 1714819022018576384