Comparison of operative and non-operative treatment of acute undisplaced or minimally-displaced scaphoid fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Traditionally, acute undisplaced or minimally-displaced scaphoid fractures are treated by casting in short- or long-arm casts. Although reports have shown that operative treatment is safe, effective and produces satisfactory results, outcomes from current studies comparing these two methods are ques...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Longxiang Shen, Jianfei Tang, Congfeng Luo, Xuetao Xie, Zhiquan An, Changqing Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4420279?pdf=render
id doaj-53a01f5068034172bc3d4ee993be8734
record_format Article
spelling doaj-53a01f5068034172bc3d4ee993be87342020-11-25T00:57:16ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01105e012524710.1371/journal.pone.0125247Comparison of operative and non-operative treatment of acute undisplaced or minimally-displaced scaphoid fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Longxiang ShenJianfei TangCongfeng LuoXuetao XieZhiquan AnChangqing ZhangTraditionally, acute undisplaced or minimally-displaced scaphoid fractures are treated by casting in short- or long-arm casts. Although reports have shown that operative treatment is safe, effective and produces satisfactory results, outcomes from current studies comparing these two methods are questionable. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of operative versus non-operative treatment for acute undisplaced or minimally-displaced scaphoid fractures in adults.Computerized searches were performed without language restrictions and all randomized controlled studies providing information on the effects of operative versus non-operative treatment on the outcomes of acute undisplaced or minimally-displaced scaphoid fractures were included. The weighted and standard mean difference (WMD and SMD) or the relative risk (RR) were calculated for continuous or dichotomous data respectively.A total of six studies reported in seven publications were included, representing data on 340 fractures. Meta-analysis indicated that operative treatment resulted in significantly better functional outcomes in the short term when compared with non-operative treatment. Consistently, patients who accepted surgery had a more rapid return to work. Further, surgery was advantageous in preventing delayed union of the fractures, a finding supported by the results of analysis of the time to fracture union. A number-needed-to-treat analysis revealed that more than 20 patients would have to undergo operative treatment to prevent one delayed union.Acute undisplaced or minimally-displaced scaphoid fractures demonstrate faster recovery with operative treatment; however, the current meta-analysis does not provide evidence supporting the routine use of operative treatment for all acute undisplaced or minimally-displaced scaphoid fractures.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4420279?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Longxiang Shen
Jianfei Tang
Congfeng Luo
Xuetao Xie
Zhiquan An
Changqing Zhang
spellingShingle Longxiang Shen
Jianfei Tang
Congfeng Luo
Xuetao Xie
Zhiquan An
Changqing Zhang
Comparison of operative and non-operative treatment of acute undisplaced or minimally-displaced scaphoid fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Longxiang Shen
Jianfei Tang
Congfeng Luo
Xuetao Xie
Zhiquan An
Changqing Zhang
author_sort Longxiang Shen
title Comparison of operative and non-operative treatment of acute undisplaced or minimally-displaced scaphoid fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
title_short Comparison of operative and non-operative treatment of acute undisplaced or minimally-displaced scaphoid fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
title_full Comparison of operative and non-operative treatment of acute undisplaced or minimally-displaced scaphoid fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
title_fullStr Comparison of operative and non-operative treatment of acute undisplaced or minimally-displaced scaphoid fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of operative and non-operative treatment of acute undisplaced or minimally-displaced scaphoid fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
title_sort comparison of operative and non-operative treatment of acute undisplaced or minimally-displaced scaphoid fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Traditionally, acute undisplaced or minimally-displaced scaphoid fractures are treated by casting in short- or long-arm casts. Although reports have shown that operative treatment is safe, effective and produces satisfactory results, outcomes from current studies comparing these two methods are questionable. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of operative versus non-operative treatment for acute undisplaced or minimally-displaced scaphoid fractures in adults.Computerized searches were performed without language restrictions and all randomized controlled studies providing information on the effects of operative versus non-operative treatment on the outcomes of acute undisplaced or minimally-displaced scaphoid fractures were included. The weighted and standard mean difference (WMD and SMD) or the relative risk (RR) were calculated for continuous or dichotomous data respectively.A total of six studies reported in seven publications were included, representing data on 340 fractures. Meta-analysis indicated that operative treatment resulted in significantly better functional outcomes in the short term when compared with non-operative treatment. Consistently, patients who accepted surgery had a more rapid return to work. Further, surgery was advantageous in preventing delayed union of the fractures, a finding supported by the results of analysis of the time to fracture union. A number-needed-to-treat analysis revealed that more than 20 patients would have to undergo operative treatment to prevent one delayed union.Acute undisplaced or minimally-displaced scaphoid fractures demonstrate faster recovery with operative treatment; however, the current meta-analysis does not provide evidence supporting the routine use of operative treatment for all acute undisplaced or minimally-displaced scaphoid fractures.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4420279?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT longxiangshen comparisonofoperativeandnonoperativetreatmentofacuteundisplacedorminimallydisplacedscaphoidfracturesametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT jianfeitang comparisonofoperativeandnonoperativetreatmentofacuteundisplacedorminimallydisplacedscaphoidfracturesametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT congfengluo comparisonofoperativeandnonoperativetreatmentofacuteundisplacedorminimallydisplacedscaphoidfracturesametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xuetaoxie comparisonofoperativeandnonoperativetreatmentofacuteundisplacedorminimallydisplacedscaphoidfracturesametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhiquanan comparisonofoperativeandnonoperativetreatmentofacuteundisplacedorminimallydisplacedscaphoidfracturesametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT changqingzhang comparisonofoperativeandnonoperativetreatmentofacuteundisplacedorminimallydisplacedscaphoidfracturesametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
_version_ 1725225001364226048