Incivility in user comments on online news articles: Investigating the role of opinion dissonance for the effects of incivility on attitudes, emotions and the willingness to participate

Online discussions in comment sections on news websites often do not follow deliberative standards but are instead marked by uncivil expressions of disaffirmation and frustration. This study investigates the effects uncivil statements can have on readers of those comments, especially when the opinio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julia Lück, Carlotta Nardi
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG 2019-07-01
Series:Studies in Communication, Media
Online Access:https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/2192-4007-2019-3-311
id doaj-539b4823a3f143a7bbc6edc4c5ae05b4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-539b4823a3f143a7bbc6edc4c5ae05b42020-11-25T02:46:57ZdeuNomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KGStudies in Communication, Media2192-40072019-07-018331133710.5771/2192-4007-2019-3-3111057712192400720193311Incivility in user comments on online news articles: Investigating the role of opinion dissonance for the effects of incivility on attitudes, emotions and the willingness to participateJulia LückCarlotta NardiOnline discussions in comment sections on news websites often do not follow deliberative standards but are instead marked by uncivil expressions of disaffirmation and frustration. This study investigates the effects uncivil statements can have on readers of those comments, especially when the opinion expressed in that comment is contrary to their beliefs. In an online experiment embedded in an online survey 427 participants were confronted with a neutral news article that was accompanied by either civil or uncivil user comments that supported or opposed their own opinions (2×2 between-subject design). Articles and commentaries dealt with the refugee question in Germany. The research focuses on readers’ open-mindedness, willingness to talk to the other side, attitude certainty, moral indignation and willingness to participate in online and offline activities when being exposed to incivility in an online debate. The results support the assumption that incivility has detrimental effects for a deliberative online discussion, but we cannot confirm that the combination of uncivil and unlike-minded comments has the most adverse effects.https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/2192-4007-2019-3-311
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Julia Lück
Carlotta Nardi
spellingShingle Julia Lück
Carlotta Nardi
Incivility in user comments on online news articles: Investigating the role of opinion dissonance for the effects of incivility on attitudes, emotions and the willingness to participate
Studies in Communication, Media
author_facet Julia Lück
Carlotta Nardi
author_sort Julia Lück
title Incivility in user comments on online news articles: Investigating the role of opinion dissonance for the effects of incivility on attitudes, emotions and the willingness to participate
title_short Incivility in user comments on online news articles: Investigating the role of opinion dissonance for the effects of incivility on attitudes, emotions and the willingness to participate
title_full Incivility in user comments on online news articles: Investigating the role of opinion dissonance for the effects of incivility on attitudes, emotions and the willingness to participate
title_fullStr Incivility in user comments on online news articles: Investigating the role of opinion dissonance for the effects of incivility on attitudes, emotions and the willingness to participate
title_full_unstemmed Incivility in user comments on online news articles: Investigating the role of opinion dissonance for the effects of incivility on attitudes, emotions and the willingness to participate
title_sort incivility in user comments on online news articles: investigating the role of opinion dissonance for the effects of incivility on attitudes, emotions and the willingness to participate
publisher Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG
series Studies in Communication, Media
issn 2192-4007
publishDate 2019-07-01
description Online discussions in comment sections on news websites often do not follow deliberative standards but are instead marked by uncivil expressions of disaffirmation and frustration. This study investigates the effects uncivil statements can have on readers of those comments, especially when the opinion expressed in that comment is contrary to their beliefs. In an online experiment embedded in an online survey 427 participants were confronted with a neutral news article that was accompanied by either civil or uncivil user comments that supported or opposed their own opinions (2×2 between-subject design). Articles and commentaries dealt with the refugee question in Germany. The research focuses on readers’ open-mindedness, willingness to talk to the other side, attitude certainty, moral indignation and willingness to participate in online and offline activities when being exposed to incivility in an online debate. The results support the assumption that incivility has detrimental effects for a deliberative online discussion, but we cannot confirm that the combination of uncivil and unlike-minded comments has the most adverse effects.
url https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/2192-4007-2019-3-311
work_keys_str_mv AT julialuck incivilityinusercommentsononlinenewsarticlesinvestigatingtheroleofopiniondissonancefortheeffectsofincivilityonattitudesemotionsandthewillingnesstoparticipate
AT carlottanardi incivilityinusercommentsononlinenewsarticlesinvestigatingtheroleofopiniondissonancefortheeffectsofincivilityonattitudesemotionsandthewillingnesstoparticipate
_version_ 1724755523833692160