Mid-term clinical and functional outcomes of distal biceps tendon repair: A comparative study of two surgical fixation techniques

Objective: Acute rupture of the distal biceps tendon is relatively uncommon, and surgical repair is advocated for acute injuries to restore strength and function. Numerous techniques are described in the literature, with no true consensus regarding the optimal method of fixation. The aim of this stu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emma Poyser, Wahid Abdul, Hemang Mehta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-06-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Rehabilitation
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2210491720903472
id doaj-53878a3cf0bd478ea745b161d84c2107
record_format Article
spelling doaj-53878a3cf0bd478ea745b161d84c21072020-11-25T03:37:54ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Rehabilitation2210-49172210-49252020-06-012710.1177/2210491720903472Mid-term clinical and functional outcomes of distal biceps tendon repair: A comparative study of two surgical fixation techniquesEmma PoyserWahid AbdulHemang MehtaObjective: Acute rupture of the distal biceps tendon is relatively uncommon, and surgical repair is advocated for acute injuries to restore strength and function. Numerous techniques are described in the literature, with no true consensus regarding the optimal method of fixation. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures, clinical outcomes and complications for patients undergoing distal biceps tendon repair using two fixation techniques: cortical button and suture anchor. Methods: A retrospective single-unit case series of 51 cases (50 patients) underwent distal biceps tendon repair, comprising 19 cortical button and 32 suture anchor fixations. Patients were assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and overall satisfaction. Clinical outcomes and complications were reviewed from patient records. Results: Thirty-eight (76.5%) patients responded to DASH questionnaires with a mean follow-up of 189 weeks (11.5–425 weeks). Mean DASH scores for cortical button and suture anchor groups were 6.2 (0–30.8) and 3.3 (0–16.7), respectively ( p = 0.21). Eight patients (16%) reported lateral cutaneous neuropraxia in the early post-operative period. All but two of these patients experienced complete resolution at the final follow-up. One patient had heterotrophic ossification, which did not require any further intervention. There was one re-rupture (suture anchor), but the patient declined further surgical intervention. Conclusion: There were no statistically significant differences in the patient-reported outcome measures, overall satisfaction and complication rate between patients undergoing either method of fixation. Level of evidence: IIIhttps://doi.org/10.1177/2210491720903472
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Emma Poyser
Wahid Abdul
Hemang Mehta
spellingShingle Emma Poyser
Wahid Abdul
Hemang Mehta
Mid-term clinical and functional outcomes of distal biceps tendon repair: A comparative study of two surgical fixation techniques
Journal of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Rehabilitation
author_facet Emma Poyser
Wahid Abdul
Hemang Mehta
author_sort Emma Poyser
title Mid-term clinical and functional outcomes of distal biceps tendon repair: A comparative study of two surgical fixation techniques
title_short Mid-term clinical and functional outcomes of distal biceps tendon repair: A comparative study of two surgical fixation techniques
title_full Mid-term clinical and functional outcomes of distal biceps tendon repair: A comparative study of two surgical fixation techniques
title_fullStr Mid-term clinical and functional outcomes of distal biceps tendon repair: A comparative study of two surgical fixation techniques
title_full_unstemmed Mid-term clinical and functional outcomes of distal biceps tendon repair: A comparative study of two surgical fixation techniques
title_sort mid-term clinical and functional outcomes of distal biceps tendon repair: a comparative study of two surgical fixation techniques
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Rehabilitation
issn 2210-4917
2210-4925
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Objective: Acute rupture of the distal biceps tendon is relatively uncommon, and surgical repair is advocated for acute injuries to restore strength and function. Numerous techniques are described in the literature, with no true consensus regarding the optimal method of fixation. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures, clinical outcomes and complications for patients undergoing distal biceps tendon repair using two fixation techniques: cortical button and suture anchor. Methods: A retrospective single-unit case series of 51 cases (50 patients) underwent distal biceps tendon repair, comprising 19 cortical button and 32 suture anchor fixations. Patients were assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and overall satisfaction. Clinical outcomes and complications were reviewed from patient records. Results: Thirty-eight (76.5%) patients responded to DASH questionnaires with a mean follow-up of 189 weeks (11.5–425 weeks). Mean DASH scores for cortical button and suture anchor groups were 6.2 (0–30.8) and 3.3 (0–16.7), respectively ( p = 0.21). Eight patients (16%) reported lateral cutaneous neuropraxia in the early post-operative period. All but two of these patients experienced complete resolution at the final follow-up. One patient had heterotrophic ossification, which did not require any further intervention. There was one re-rupture (suture anchor), but the patient declined further surgical intervention. Conclusion: There were no statistically significant differences in the patient-reported outcome measures, overall satisfaction and complication rate between patients undergoing either method of fixation. Level of evidence: III
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2210491720903472
work_keys_str_mv AT emmapoyser midtermclinicalandfunctionaloutcomesofdistalbicepstendonrepairacomparativestudyoftwosurgicalfixationtechniques
AT wahidabdul midtermclinicalandfunctionaloutcomesofdistalbicepstendonrepairacomparativestudyoftwosurgicalfixationtechniques
AT hemangmehta midtermclinicalandfunctionaloutcomesofdistalbicepstendonrepairacomparativestudyoftwosurgicalfixationtechniques
_version_ 1724543043927801856