Maternal and neonatal outcome of reverse breech extraction of an impacted fetal head during caesarean section in advanced stage of labour: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract Background Caesarean section with extraction of a deeply impacted fetal head is technically challenging and is associated with serious maternal and neonatal complications. The purpose of the study was to identify risks and evaluate selected outcome parameters associated with difficult fetal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Franziska Lenz, Nina Kimmich, Roland Zimmermann, Martina Kreft
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-03-01
Series:BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12884-019-2253-3
id doaj-53799c5908a943459b803c4cb8d019f7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-53799c5908a943459b803c4cb8d019f72020-11-25T02:25:04ZengBMCBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth1471-23932019-03-011911810.1186/s12884-019-2253-3Maternal and neonatal outcome of reverse breech extraction of an impacted fetal head during caesarean section in advanced stage of labour: a retrospective cohort studyFranziska Lenz0Nina Kimmich1Roland Zimmermann2Martina Kreft3Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kantonsspital Baden AGDivision of Obstetrics, University Hospital ZurichDivision of Obstetrics, University Hospital ZurichDivision of Obstetrics, University Hospital ZurichAbstract Background Caesarean section with extraction of a deeply impacted fetal head is technically challenging and is associated with serious maternal and neonatal complications. The purpose of the study was to identify risks and evaluate selected outcome parameters associated with difficult fetal head extraction during caesarean section in advanced labour comparing two different extraction techniques (head pushing vs. reverse breech). Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Division of Obstetrics in a tertiary care hospital in Zurich, Switzerland. 629 women at term with a singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation during advanced intrapartum caesarean section from December 2012 until December 2016 were evaluated. Primary outcome was the incidence of uterine incision extensions. Secondary outcomes were other selected maternal and neonatal outcome parameters. Data analysis was performed using SPSS with Mann-Whitney U independent sampling test and two-tailed Fisher’s exact test (p < 0.01). Results Difficult fetal head extractions are associated with significantly elevated maternal and neonatal risks. When performed by reverse breech technique, significant lower rates of extensions of the uterine incision, shorter operation times and less operative blood loss were identified compared to the head pushing method. No statistically significant differences for the neonatal outcomes were described so far. However, among the group of difficult fetal delivery with the head pushing method two neonates had perinatal skull fractures, with one of those resulting in neonatal death. Conclusions The head pushing method is associated with higher maternal morbidity than the reverse breech method for extraction of a deeply engaged fetus during intrapartum caesarean section in advanced stage of labour.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12884-019-2253-3Impacted fetal headReverse breech extractionCaesarean sectionAdvanced stage of labour
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Franziska Lenz
Nina Kimmich
Roland Zimmermann
Martina Kreft
spellingShingle Franziska Lenz
Nina Kimmich
Roland Zimmermann
Martina Kreft
Maternal and neonatal outcome of reverse breech extraction of an impacted fetal head during caesarean section in advanced stage of labour: a retrospective cohort study
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Impacted fetal head
Reverse breech extraction
Caesarean section
Advanced stage of labour
author_facet Franziska Lenz
Nina Kimmich
Roland Zimmermann
Martina Kreft
author_sort Franziska Lenz
title Maternal and neonatal outcome of reverse breech extraction of an impacted fetal head during caesarean section in advanced stage of labour: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Maternal and neonatal outcome of reverse breech extraction of an impacted fetal head during caesarean section in advanced stage of labour: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Maternal and neonatal outcome of reverse breech extraction of an impacted fetal head during caesarean section in advanced stage of labour: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Maternal and neonatal outcome of reverse breech extraction of an impacted fetal head during caesarean section in advanced stage of labour: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Maternal and neonatal outcome of reverse breech extraction of an impacted fetal head during caesarean section in advanced stage of labour: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort maternal and neonatal outcome of reverse breech extraction of an impacted fetal head during caesarean section in advanced stage of labour: a retrospective cohort study
publisher BMC
series BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
issn 1471-2393
publishDate 2019-03-01
description Abstract Background Caesarean section with extraction of a deeply impacted fetal head is technically challenging and is associated with serious maternal and neonatal complications. The purpose of the study was to identify risks and evaluate selected outcome parameters associated with difficult fetal head extraction during caesarean section in advanced labour comparing two different extraction techniques (head pushing vs. reverse breech). Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Division of Obstetrics in a tertiary care hospital in Zurich, Switzerland. 629 women at term with a singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation during advanced intrapartum caesarean section from December 2012 until December 2016 were evaluated. Primary outcome was the incidence of uterine incision extensions. Secondary outcomes were other selected maternal and neonatal outcome parameters. Data analysis was performed using SPSS with Mann-Whitney U independent sampling test and two-tailed Fisher’s exact test (p < 0.01). Results Difficult fetal head extractions are associated with significantly elevated maternal and neonatal risks. When performed by reverse breech technique, significant lower rates of extensions of the uterine incision, shorter operation times and less operative blood loss were identified compared to the head pushing method. No statistically significant differences for the neonatal outcomes were described so far. However, among the group of difficult fetal delivery with the head pushing method two neonates had perinatal skull fractures, with one of those resulting in neonatal death. Conclusions The head pushing method is associated with higher maternal morbidity than the reverse breech method for extraction of a deeply engaged fetus during intrapartum caesarean section in advanced stage of labour.
topic Impacted fetal head
Reverse breech extraction
Caesarean section
Advanced stage of labour
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12884-019-2253-3
work_keys_str_mv AT franziskalenz maternalandneonataloutcomeofreversebreechextractionofanimpactedfetalheadduringcaesareansectioninadvancedstageoflabouraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT ninakimmich maternalandneonataloutcomeofreversebreechextractionofanimpactedfetalheadduringcaesareansectioninadvancedstageoflabouraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT rolandzimmermann maternalandneonataloutcomeofreversebreechextractionofanimpactedfetalheadduringcaesareansectioninadvancedstageoflabouraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT martinakreft maternalandneonataloutcomeofreversebreechextractionofanimpactedfetalheadduringcaesareansectioninadvancedstageoflabouraretrospectivecohortstudy
_version_ 1724852952801214464