The neonatal assessment manual score (NAME) for improving the clinical management of infants: a perspective validity study

Abstract Background and objectives The Neonatal Assessment Manual scorE (NAME) was developed to assist in the clinical management of infants in the neonatal ward by assessing their body’s compliance and homogeneity. The present study begins its validation process. Methods An expert panel of neonatal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrea Manzotti, Marco Chiera, Matteo Galli, Erica Lombardi, Simona La Rocca, Pamela Biasi, Jorge Esteves, Gianluca Lista, Francesco Cerritelli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-03-01
Series:Italian Journal of Pediatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-021-01012-9
id doaj-537337bfa6224bb3af64c1c62eecbea8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-537337bfa6224bb3af64c1c62eecbea82021-03-11T12:53:18ZengBMCItalian Journal of Pediatrics1824-72882021-03-014711810.1186/s13052-021-01012-9The neonatal assessment manual score (NAME) for improving the clinical management of infants: a perspective validity studyAndrea Manzotti0Marco Chiera1Matteo Galli2Erica Lombardi3Simona La Rocca4Pamela Biasi5Jorge Esteves6Gianluca Lista7Francesco Cerritelli8RAISE lab, Foundation COME CollaborationRAISE lab, Foundation COME CollaborationRAISE lab, Foundation COME CollaborationRAISE lab, Foundation COME CollaborationRAISE lab, Foundation COME CollaborationRAISE lab, Foundation COME CollaborationRAISE lab, Foundation COME CollaborationDivision of Neonatology, “V. Buzzi” Children’s Hospital, ASST-FBF-SaccoRAISE lab, Foundation COME CollaborationAbstract Background and objectives The Neonatal Assessment Manual scorE (NAME) was developed to assist in the clinical management of infants in the neonatal ward by assessing their body’s compliance and homogeneity. The present study begins its validation process. Methods An expert panel of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) professionals investigated the NAME face and content validity. Content validity was assessed through the content validity index (CVI). Construct validity was assessed using data collected from 50 newborns hospitalized in the NICU of “Vittore Buzzi” Children Hospital of Milan, Italy. Kendall’s τ and ordinal logistic regressions were used to evaluate the correlation between the NAME scores and infants’ gestational age, birth weight, post-menstrual age, weight at the time of assessment, and a complexity index related to organic complications. Results The CVIs for compliance, homogeneity, and the whole scale were respectively 1, 0.9, and 0.95. Construct validity analysis showed significant positive correlations between the NAME and infants’ weight and age, and a negative correlation between the NAME and the complexity index (τ = − 0.31 [95% IC: − 0.47, − 0.12], p = 0.016 and OR = 0.56 [95% IC: 0.32, 0.94], p = 0.034 for categorical NAME; τ = − 0.32 [95% IC: − 0.48, − 0.14], p = 0.005 for numerical NAME). Conclusions The NAME was well accepted by NICU professionals in this study and it demonstrates good construct validity in discriminating the infant’s general condition. Future studies are needed to test the NAME reliability and predictive capacity.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-021-01012-9NeonatologyManual assessmentHaptic perceptionBody volumeAutonomic nervous systemPrematurity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrea Manzotti
Marco Chiera
Matteo Galli
Erica Lombardi
Simona La Rocca
Pamela Biasi
Jorge Esteves
Gianluca Lista
Francesco Cerritelli
spellingShingle Andrea Manzotti
Marco Chiera
Matteo Galli
Erica Lombardi
Simona La Rocca
Pamela Biasi
Jorge Esteves
Gianluca Lista
Francesco Cerritelli
The neonatal assessment manual score (NAME) for improving the clinical management of infants: a perspective validity study
Italian Journal of Pediatrics
Neonatology
Manual assessment
Haptic perception
Body volume
Autonomic nervous system
Prematurity
author_facet Andrea Manzotti
Marco Chiera
Matteo Galli
Erica Lombardi
Simona La Rocca
Pamela Biasi
Jorge Esteves
Gianluca Lista
Francesco Cerritelli
author_sort Andrea Manzotti
title The neonatal assessment manual score (NAME) for improving the clinical management of infants: a perspective validity study
title_short The neonatal assessment manual score (NAME) for improving the clinical management of infants: a perspective validity study
title_full The neonatal assessment manual score (NAME) for improving the clinical management of infants: a perspective validity study
title_fullStr The neonatal assessment manual score (NAME) for improving the clinical management of infants: a perspective validity study
title_full_unstemmed The neonatal assessment manual score (NAME) for improving the clinical management of infants: a perspective validity study
title_sort neonatal assessment manual score (name) for improving the clinical management of infants: a perspective validity study
publisher BMC
series Italian Journal of Pediatrics
issn 1824-7288
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Abstract Background and objectives The Neonatal Assessment Manual scorE (NAME) was developed to assist in the clinical management of infants in the neonatal ward by assessing their body’s compliance and homogeneity. The present study begins its validation process. Methods An expert panel of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) professionals investigated the NAME face and content validity. Content validity was assessed through the content validity index (CVI). Construct validity was assessed using data collected from 50 newborns hospitalized in the NICU of “Vittore Buzzi” Children Hospital of Milan, Italy. Kendall’s τ and ordinal logistic regressions were used to evaluate the correlation between the NAME scores and infants’ gestational age, birth weight, post-menstrual age, weight at the time of assessment, and a complexity index related to organic complications. Results The CVIs for compliance, homogeneity, and the whole scale were respectively 1, 0.9, and 0.95. Construct validity analysis showed significant positive correlations between the NAME and infants’ weight and age, and a negative correlation between the NAME and the complexity index (τ = − 0.31 [95% IC: − 0.47, − 0.12], p = 0.016 and OR = 0.56 [95% IC: 0.32, 0.94], p = 0.034 for categorical NAME; τ = − 0.32 [95% IC: − 0.48, − 0.14], p = 0.005 for numerical NAME). Conclusions The NAME was well accepted by NICU professionals in this study and it demonstrates good construct validity in discriminating the infant’s general condition. Future studies are needed to test the NAME reliability and predictive capacity.
topic Neonatology
Manual assessment
Haptic perception
Body volume
Autonomic nervous system
Prematurity
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-021-01012-9
work_keys_str_mv AT andreamanzotti theneonatalassessmentmanualscorenameforimprovingtheclinicalmanagementofinfantsaperspectivevaliditystudy
AT marcochiera theneonatalassessmentmanualscorenameforimprovingtheclinicalmanagementofinfantsaperspectivevaliditystudy
AT matteogalli theneonatalassessmentmanualscorenameforimprovingtheclinicalmanagementofinfantsaperspectivevaliditystudy
AT ericalombardi theneonatalassessmentmanualscorenameforimprovingtheclinicalmanagementofinfantsaperspectivevaliditystudy
AT simonalarocca theneonatalassessmentmanualscorenameforimprovingtheclinicalmanagementofinfantsaperspectivevaliditystudy
AT pamelabiasi theneonatalassessmentmanualscorenameforimprovingtheclinicalmanagementofinfantsaperspectivevaliditystudy
AT jorgeesteves theneonatalassessmentmanualscorenameforimprovingtheclinicalmanagementofinfantsaperspectivevaliditystudy
AT gianlucalista theneonatalassessmentmanualscorenameforimprovingtheclinicalmanagementofinfantsaperspectivevaliditystudy
AT francescocerritelli theneonatalassessmentmanualscorenameforimprovingtheclinicalmanagementofinfantsaperspectivevaliditystudy
AT andreamanzotti neonatalassessmentmanualscorenameforimprovingtheclinicalmanagementofinfantsaperspectivevaliditystudy
AT marcochiera neonatalassessmentmanualscorenameforimprovingtheclinicalmanagementofinfantsaperspectivevaliditystudy
AT matteogalli neonatalassessmentmanualscorenameforimprovingtheclinicalmanagementofinfantsaperspectivevaliditystudy
AT ericalombardi neonatalassessmentmanualscorenameforimprovingtheclinicalmanagementofinfantsaperspectivevaliditystudy
AT simonalarocca neonatalassessmentmanualscorenameforimprovingtheclinicalmanagementofinfantsaperspectivevaliditystudy
AT pamelabiasi neonatalassessmentmanualscorenameforimprovingtheclinicalmanagementofinfantsaperspectivevaliditystudy
AT jorgeesteves neonatalassessmentmanualscorenameforimprovingtheclinicalmanagementofinfantsaperspectivevaliditystudy
AT gianlucalista neonatalassessmentmanualscorenameforimprovingtheclinicalmanagementofinfantsaperspectivevaliditystudy
AT francescocerritelli neonatalassessmentmanualscorenameforimprovingtheclinicalmanagementofinfantsaperspectivevaliditystudy
_version_ 1724223922530942976