The neonatal assessment manual score (NAME) for improving the clinical management of infants: a perspective validity study
Abstract Background and objectives The Neonatal Assessment Manual scorE (NAME) was developed to assist in the clinical management of infants in the neonatal ward by assessing their body’s compliance and homogeneity. The present study begins its validation process. Methods An expert panel of neonatal...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-03-01
|
Series: | Italian Journal of Pediatrics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-021-01012-9 |
id |
doaj-537337bfa6224bb3af64c1c62eecbea8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-537337bfa6224bb3af64c1c62eecbea82021-03-11T12:53:18ZengBMCItalian Journal of Pediatrics1824-72882021-03-014711810.1186/s13052-021-01012-9The neonatal assessment manual score (NAME) for improving the clinical management of infants: a perspective validity studyAndrea Manzotti0Marco Chiera1Matteo Galli2Erica Lombardi3Simona La Rocca4Pamela Biasi5Jorge Esteves6Gianluca Lista7Francesco Cerritelli8RAISE lab, Foundation COME CollaborationRAISE lab, Foundation COME CollaborationRAISE lab, Foundation COME CollaborationRAISE lab, Foundation COME CollaborationRAISE lab, Foundation COME CollaborationRAISE lab, Foundation COME CollaborationRAISE lab, Foundation COME CollaborationDivision of Neonatology, “V. Buzzi” Children’s Hospital, ASST-FBF-SaccoRAISE lab, Foundation COME CollaborationAbstract Background and objectives The Neonatal Assessment Manual scorE (NAME) was developed to assist in the clinical management of infants in the neonatal ward by assessing their body’s compliance and homogeneity. The present study begins its validation process. Methods An expert panel of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) professionals investigated the NAME face and content validity. Content validity was assessed through the content validity index (CVI). Construct validity was assessed using data collected from 50 newborns hospitalized in the NICU of “Vittore Buzzi” Children Hospital of Milan, Italy. Kendall’s τ and ordinal logistic regressions were used to evaluate the correlation between the NAME scores and infants’ gestational age, birth weight, post-menstrual age, weight at the time of assessment, and a complexity index related to organic complications. Results The CVIs for compliance, homogeneity, and the whole scale were respectively 1, 0.9, and 0.95. Construct validity analysis showed significant positive correlations between the NAME and infants’ weight and age, and a negative correlation between the NAME and the complexity index (τ = − 0.31 [95% IC: − 0.47, − 0.12], p = 0.016 and OR = 0.56 [95% IC: 0.32, 0.94], p = 0.034 for categorical NAME; τ = − 0.32 [95% IC: − 0.48, − 0.14], p = 0.005 for numerical NAME). Conclusions The NAME was well accepted by NICU professionals in this study and it demonstrates good construct validity in discriminating the infant’s general condition. Future studies are needed to test the NAME reliability and predictive capacity.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-021-01012-9NeonatologyManual assessmentHaptic perceptionBody volumeAutonomic nervous systemPrematurity |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Andrea Manzotti Marco Chiera Matteo Galli Erica Lombardi Simona La Rocca Pamela Biasi Jorge Esteves Gianluca Lista Francesco Cerritelli |
spellingShingle |
Andrea Manzotti Marco Chiera Matteo Galli Erica Lombardi Simona La Rocca Pamela Biasi Jorge Esteves Gianluca Lista Francesco Cerritelli The neonatal assessment manual score (NAME) for improving the clinical management of infants: a perspective validity study Italian Journal of Pediatrics Neonatology Manual assessment Haptic perception Body volume Autonomic nervous system Prematurity |
author_facet |
Andrea Manzotti Marco Chiera Matteo Galli Erica Lombardi Simona La Rocca Pamela Biasi Jorge Esteves Gianluca Lista Francesco Cerritelli |
author_sort |
Andrea Manzotti |
title |
The neonatal assessment manual score (NAME) for improving the clinical management of infants: a perspective validity study |
title_short |
The neonatal assessment manual score (NAME) for improving the clinical management of infants: a perspective validity study |
title_full |
The neonatal assessment manual score (NAME) for improving the clinical management of infants: a perspective validity study |
title_fullStr |
The neonatal assessment manual score (NAME) for improving the clinical management of infants: a perspective validity study |
title_full_unstemmed |
The neonatal assessment manual score (NAME) for improving the clinical management of infants: a perspective validity study |
title_sort |
neonatal assessment manual score (name) for improving the clinical management of infants: a perspective validity study |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Italian Journal of Pediatrics |
issn |
1824-7288 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
Abstract Background and objectives The Neonatal Assessment Manual scorE (NAME) was developed to assist in the clinical management of infants in the neonatal ward by assessing their body’s compliance and homogeneity. The present study begins its validation process. Methods An expert panel of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) professionals investigated the NAME face and content validity. Content validity was assessed through the content validity index (CVI). Construct validity was assessed using data collected from 50 newborns hospitalized in the NICU of “Vittore Buzzi” Children Hospital of Milan, Italy. Kendall’s τ and ordinal logistic regressions were used to evaluate the correlation between the NAME scores and infants’ gestational age, birth weight, post-menstrual age, weight at the time of assessment, and a complexity index related to organic complications. Results The CVIs for compliance, homogeneity, and the whole scale were respectively 1, 0.9, and 0.95. Construct validity analysis showed significant positive correlations between the NAME and infants’ weight and age, and a negative correlation between the NAME and the complexity index (τ = − 0.31 [95% IC: − 0.47, − 0.12], p = 0.016 and OR = 0.56 [95% IC: 0.32, 0.94], p = 0.034 for categorical NAME; τ = − 0.32 [95% IC: − 0.48, − 0.14], p = 0.005 for numerical NAME). Conclusions The NAME was well accepted by NICU professionals in this study and it demonstrates good construct validity in discriminating the infant’s general condition. Future studies are needed to test the NAME reliability and predictive capacity. |
topic |
Neonatology Manual assessment Haptic perception Body volume Autonomic nervous system Prematurity |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-021-01012-9 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT andreamanzotti theneonatalassessmentmanualscorenameforimprovingtheclinicalmanagementofinfantsaperspectivevaliditystudy AT marcochiera theneonatalassessmentmanualscorenameforimprovingtheclinicalmanagementofinfantsaperspectivevaliditystudy AT matteogalli theneonatalassessmentmanualscorenameforimprovingtheclinicalmanagementofinfantsaperspectivevaliditystudy AT ericalombardi theneonatalassessmentmanualscorenameforimprovingtheclinicalmanagementofinfantsaperspectivevaliditystudy AT simonalarocca theneonatalassessmentmanualscorenameforimprovingtheclinicalmanagementofinfantsaperspectivevaliditystudy AT pamelabiasi theneonatalassessmentmanualscorenameforimprovingtheclinicalmanagementofinfantsaperspectivevaliditystudy AT jorgeesteves theneonatalassessmentmanualscorenameforimprovingtheclinicalmanagementofinfantsaperspectivevaliditystudy AT gianlucalista theneonatalassessmentmanualscorenameforimprovingtheclinicalmanagementofinfantsaperspectivevaliditystudy AT francescocerritelli theneonatalassessmentmanualscorenameforimprovingtheclinicalmanagementofinfantsaperspectivevaliditystudy AT andreamanzotti neonatalassessmentmanualscorenameforimprovingtheclinicalmanagementofinfantsaperspectivevaliditystudy AT marcochiera neonatalassessmentmanualscorenameforimprovingtheclinicalmanagementofinfantsaperspectivevaliditystudy AT matteogalli neonatalassessmentmanualscorenameforimprovingtheclinicalmanagementofinfantsaperspectivevaliditystudy AT ericalombardi neonatalassessmentmanualscorenameforimprovingtheclinicalmanagementofinfantsaperspectivevaliditystudy AT simonalarocca neonatalassessmentmanualscorenameforimprovingtheclinicalmanagementofinfantsaperspectivevaliditystudy AT pamelabiasi neonatalassessmentmanualscorenameforimprovingtheclinicalmanagementofinfantsaperspectivevaliditystudy AT jorgeesteves neonatalassessmentmanualscorenameforimprovingtheclinicalmanagementofinfantsaperspectivevaliditystudy AT gianlucalista neonatalassessmentmanualscorenameforimprovingtheclinicalmanagementofinfantsaperspectivevaliditystudy AT francescocerritelli neonatalassessmentmanualscorenameforimprovingtheclinicalmanagementofinfantsaperspectivevaliditystudy |
_version_ |
1724223922530942976 |