Crossed control revisited; The structure and interpretations of “want” and so on + passive verb in Malay/Indonesian

<p> </p><p><span> </span>In Malay/Indonesian, when certain predicates such as “want” are followed by a passive verb, an ambiguity arises about who has the desire and other attitudes in question. The attitude-holder can be either the surface subject or the passive agent....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hiroki Nomoto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Indonesia 2021-05-01
Series:Wacana: Journal of the Humanities of Indonesia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://wacana.ui.ac.id/index.php/wjhi/article/view/1026
id doaj-535e097a3bd54ed3a7fe6c2d9dcabaa3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-535e097a3bd54ed3a7fe6c2d9dcabaa32021-07-08T04:08:09ZengUniversity of IndonesiaWacana: Journal of the Humanities of Indonesia1411-22722407-68992021-05-0122233836410.17510/wacana.v22i2.1026585Crossed control revisited; The structure and interpretations of “want” and so on + passive verb in Malay/IndonesianHiroki Nomoto0Tokyo University of Foreign Studies<p> </p><p><span> </span>In Malay/Indonesian, when certain predicates such as “want” are followed by a passive verb, an ambiguity arises about who has the desire and other attitudes in question. The attitude-holder can be either the surface subject or the passive agent. This article critically assesses the data and claims presented in three recent studies (Mike Berger 2019; Paul Kroeger and Kristen Frazier 2020; Helen Jeoung 2020) through consideration of additional data. It shows that the ambiguity is empirically robust, contrary to the doubts expressed by Jeoung, and that the restructuring analysis advocated by the latter two studies has problems with its primary evidence: alternate voice marking realization. Instead, the paper confirms the previous understanding of the construction, including a bi-clausal structure with a dyadic matrix predicate and the importance of voice marking. Methodologically, it demonstrates that linguistic evidence should come from multiple sources, that is, not from elicitation or texts alone but from both of these (and perhaps more).</p>http://wacana.ui.ac.id/index.php/wjhi/article/view/1026indonesiancrossed controlvoiceverb-auxiliary distinctionrestructuring.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hiroki Nomoto
spellingShingle Hiroki Nomoto
Crossed control revisited; The structure and interpretations of “want” and so on + passive verb in Malay/Indonesian
Wacana: Journal of the Humanities of Indonesia
indonesian
crossed control
voice
verb-auxiliary distinction
restructuring.
author_facet Hiroki Nomoto
author_sort Hiroki Nomoto
title Crossed control revisited; The structure and interpretations of “want” and so on + passive verb in Malay/Indonesian
title_short Crossed control revisited; The structure and interpretations of “want” and so on + passive verb in Malay/Indonesian
title_full Crossed control revisited; The structure and interpretations of “want” and so on + passive verb in Malay/Indonesian
title_fullStr Crossed control revisited; The structure and interpretations of “want” and so on + passive verb in Malay/Indonesian
title_full_unstemmed Crossed control revisited; The structure and interpretations of “want” and so on + passive verb in Malay/Indonesian
title_sort crossed control revisited; the structure and interpretations of “want” and so on + passive verb in malay/indonesian
publisher University of Indonesia
series Wacana: Journal of the Humanities of Indonesia
issn 1411-2272
2407-6899
publishDate 2021-05-01
description <p> </p><p><span> </span>In Malay/Indonesian, when certain predicates such as “want” are followed by a passive verb, an ambiguity arises about who has the desire and other attitudes in question. The attitude-holder can be either the surface subject or the passive agent. This article critically assesses the data and claims presented in three recent studies (Mike Berger 2019; Paul Kroeger and Kristen Frazier 2020; Helen Jeoung 2020) through consideration of additional data. It shows that the ambiguity is empirically robust, contrary to the doubts expressed by Jeoung, and that the restructuring analysis advocated by the latter two studies has problems with its primary evidence: alternate voice marking realization. Instead, the paper confirms the previous understanding of the construction, including a bi-clausal structure with a dyadic matrix predicate and the importance of voice marking. Methodologically, it demonstrates that linguistic evidence should come from multiple sources, that is, not from elicitation or texts alone but from both of these (and perhaps more).</p>
topic indonesian
crossed control
voice
verb-auxiliary distinction
restructuring.
url http://wacana.ui.ac.id/index.php/wjhi/article/view/1026
work_keys_str_mv AT hirokinomoto crossedcontrolrevisitedthestructureandinterpretationsofwantandsoonpassiveverbinmalayindonesian
_version_ 1721314146709929984