Neighbourhood society: nesting dynamics, usurpations and social behaviour in solitary bees.

Intraspecific cleptoparasitism represents a facultative strategy advantageous for reducing time and energy costs. However, only a few studies about nesting dynamics have described intraspecific cleptoparasitic behaviour in obligate solitary bees. We focused on nesting dynamics with the characterisat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kateřina Černá, Monika Zemenová, Lenka Macháčková, Zdislava Kolínová, Jakub Straka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3774747?pdf=render
id doaj-535a8f934f96422885fe8c2c3552225e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-535a8f934f96422885fe8c2c3552225e2020-11-25T02:06:26ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0189e7380610.1371/journal.pone.0073806Neighbourhood society: nesting dynamics, usurpations and social behaviour in solitary bees.Kateřina ČernáMonika ZemenováLenka MacháčkováZdislava KolínováJakub StrakaIntraspecific cleptoparasitism represents a facultative strategy advantageous for reducing time and energy costs. However, only a few studies about nesting dynamics have described intraspecific cleptoparasitic behaviour in obligate solitary bees. We focused on nesting dynamics with the characterisation of nest owner replacements and frequency of true usurpation in four aggregating species belonging to different phylogenetic lineages--Andrena vaga (Andrenidae), Anthophora plumipes (Apidae), Colletes cunicularius (Colletidae), and Osmia rufa (Megachilidae). Our study, based on the regular observation of individually marked females, shows that nest owner replacement affects 10-45% of nests across all of the studied species and years. However, 39-90% of these nests had been abandoned before owner change and thus true nest usurpations represent only a part of observed nest replacement cases. Females tend to abandon their nests regularly and found new ones when they live long enough, which is in accordance with risk-spreading strategy. We suggest that the original facultative strategy of observed solitary bees during nest founding is not cleptoparasitism per se but rather reuse of any pre-existing nest (similar to "entering" strategy in apoid wasps). This is supported by gradual increase of nests founded by "entering" during the season with an increase in the number of available nests. Although the frequent reuse of conspecific nests results in frequent contact between solitary females, and rarely, in the short-term coexistence of two females in one nest, we detected unexpectedly low level of conflict in these neighbourhood societies. We suggest that nesting dynamics with regular nest switching and reusing reduces long-term and costly intraspecific aggression, a key factor for the origin and evolution of sociality.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3774747?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kateřina Černá
Monika Zemenová
Lenka Macháčková
Zdislava Kolínová
Jakub Straka
spellingShingle Kateřina Černá
Monika Zemenová
Lenka Macháčková
Zdislava Kolínová
Jakub Straka
Neighbourhood society: nesting dynamics, usurpations and social behaviour in solitary bees.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Kateřina Černá
Monika Zemenová
Lenka Macháčková
Zdislava Kolínová
Jakub Straka
author_sort Kateřina Černá
title Neighbourhood society: nesting dynamics, usurpations and social behaviour in solitary bees.
title_short Neighbourhood society: nesting dynamics, usurpations and social behaviour in solitary bees.
title_full Neighbourhood society: nesting dynamics, usurpations and social behaviour in solitary bees.
title_fullStr Neighbourhood society: nesting dynamics, usurpations and social behaviour in solitary bees.
title_full_unstemmed Neighbourhood society: nesting dynamics, usurpations and social behaviour in solitary bees.
title_sort neighbourhood society: nesting dynamics, usurpations and social behaviour in solitary bees.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Intraspecific cleptoparasitism represents a facultative strategy advantageous for reducing time and energy costs. However, only a few studies about nesting dynamics have described intraspecific cleptoparasitic behaviour in obligate solitary bees. We focused on nesting dynamics with the characterisation of nest owner replacements and frequency of true usurpation in four aggregating species belonging to different phylogenetic lineages--Andrena vaga (Andrenidae), Anthophora plumipes (Apidae), Colletes cunicularius (Colletidae), and Osmia rufa (Megachilidae). Our study, based on the regular observation of individually marked females, shows that nest owner replacement affects 10-45% of nests across all of the studied species and years. However, 39-90% of these nests had been abandoned before owner change and thus true nest usurpations represent only a part of observed nest replacement cases. Females tend to abandon their nests regularly and found new ones when they live long enough, which is in accordance with risk-spreading strategy. We suggest that the original facultative strategy of observed solitary bees during nest founding is not cleptoparasitism per se but rather reuse of any pre-existing nest (similar to "entering" strategy in apoid wasps). This is supported by gradual increase of nests founded by "entering" during the season with an increase in the number of available nests. Although the frequent reuse of conspecific nests results in frequent contact between solitary females, and rarely, in the short-term coexistence of two females in one nest, we detected unexpectedly low level of conflict in these neighbourhood societies. We suggest that nesting dynamics with regular nest switching and reusing reduces long-term and costly intraspecific aggression, a key factor for the origin and evolution of sociality.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3774747?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT katerinacerna neighbourhoodsocietynestingdynamicsusurpationsandsocialbehaviourinsolitarybees
AT monikazemenova neighbourhoodsocietynestingdynamicsusurpationsandsocialbehaviourinsolitarybees
AT lenkamachackova neighbourhoodsocietynestingdynamicsusurpationsandsocialbehaviourinsolitarybees
AT zdislavakolinova neighbourhoodsocietynestingdynamicsusurpationsandsocialbehaviourinsolitarybees
AT jakubstraka neighbourhoodsocietynestingdynamicsusurpationsandsocialbehaviourinsolitarybees
_version_ 1724933949524803584