Why does Retraction Watch continue to offer support to Jeffrey Beall, and legitimize his post-mortem “predatory” lists?
Retraction Watch is a science watchdog that may give the impression of being both an anti-bad science and an anti-science blog. This blog has tried to legitimize its ethical stance by naming its parent organization The Center for Science Integrity Inc. (CSI), and by appointing a former Chair of t...
Main Author: | Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hungarian Communication Studies Association
2017-07-01
|
Series: | KOME: An International Journal of Pure Communication Inquiry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://komejournal.com/files/KOME_JATdS.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Jeffrey Beall’s “predatory” lists must not be used: they are biased, flawed, opaque and inaccurate
by: Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva
Published: (2017-06-01) -
Predatory or Legitimate Journals
by: Farrokh Habibzadeh
Published: (2017-04-01) -
Predatory Publishing and the Psychology Behind it
by: Marius Drugaş
Published: (2015-04-01) -
An insight into predatory journals
by: Vikas Jaysing Pawar, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Supporting a definition of predatory publishing
by: Edoardo Aromataris, et al.
Published: (2020-05-01)