Reporting quality of chronic kidney disease practice guidelines according to the RIGHT statement: a systematic analysis
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reporting quality of chronic kidney disease (CKD) guidelines. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and guideline-related websites were searched from 2008 to 2019. The CKD guidelines were included. Two reviewers used the RIGHT (Reporting Items for Practice Guideline...
Main Authors: | Yang Zhao, Yanyan Li, Junwei Li, Weijuan Song, Jun Zhao, Yan Xu, Yongxia Zhai, Shuaimin Xu |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2020-05-01
|
Series: | Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2040622320922017 |
Similar Items
-
Reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines regarding gout and hyperuricemia according to the RIGHT checklist: systematic review
by: Can Wang, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01) -
Using the RIGHT statement to evaluate the reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines in traditional Chinese medicine.
by: Xia Yun, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01) -
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
by: Matthew J Page, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01) -
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
by: Matthew J. Page, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01) -
Consensuses and controversies on pseudomyxoma peritonei: a review of the published consensus statements and guidelines
by: Yu-Lin Lin, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01)