Mapping Digital Religion: Exploring the Need for New Typologies

Today, it is challenging to separate online and offline spaces and activities, and this is also true of digital religion as online and offline religious spaces become blended or blurred. With this background, the article explores the need for new typologies of what is religious on the Internet and p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Piotr Siuda
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-05-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/6/373
id doaj-535312c2164a4248979b5b90ff13308e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-535312c2164a4248979b5b90ff13308e2021-06-01T00:42:29ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442021-05-011237337310.3390/rel12060373Mapping Digital Religion: Exploring the Need for New TypologiesPiotr Siuda0Faculty of Social Communication and Media, Kazimierz Wielki University, 85-064 Bydgoszcz, PolandToday, it is challenging to separate online and offline spaces and activities, and this is also true of digital religion as online and offline religious spaces become blended or blurred. With this background, the article explores the need for new typologies of what is religious on the Internet and proposes a conceptual framework for mapping digital religion. Four types of that which is religious on the Internet are presented based on influential classification by Helland. He introduced (1) <i>religion online</i> (sites that provide information without interactivity) and (2) <i>online religion</i> (interactivity and participation). Helland’s concept is developed by, among others, adding two types: (3) <i>innovative religion</i> (new religious movements, cults, etc.) and (4) <i>traditional religion</i> (e.g., Christianity or Islam). Each type is illustrated by selected examples and these are a result of a larger project. The examples are grouped into three areas: (1) religious influencers, (2) online rituals and (3) cyber-religions (parody religions). Additionally, the visual frame for mapping digital religion is presented including the examples mentioned. The presented framework attempts to improve Helland’s classification by considering a more dynamic nature of digital religion. The model is just one possible way for mapping digital religion and thus should be developed further. These and other future research threads are characterized.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/6/373digital religionmedia and religiononline religionreligion onlinereligious influencersonline rituals
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Piotr Siuda
spellingShingle Piotr Siuda
Mapping Digital Religion: Exploring the Need for New Typologies
Religions
digital religion
media and religion
online religion
religion online
religious influencers
online rituals
author_facet Piotr Siuda
author_sort Piotr Siuda
title Mapping Digital Religion: Exploring the Need for New Typologies
title_short Mapping Digital Religion: Exploring the Need for New Typologies
title_full Mapping Digital Religion: Exploring the Need for New Typologies
title_fullStr Mapping Digital Religion: Exploring the Need for New Typologies
title_full_unstemmed Mapping Digital Religion: Exploring the Need for New Typologies
title_sort mapping digital religion: exploring the need for new typologies
publisher MDPI AG
series Religions
issn 2077-1444
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Today, it is challenging to separate online and offline spaces and activities, and this is also true of digital religion as online and offline religious spaces become blended or blurred. With this background, the article explores the need for new typologies of what is religious on the Internet and proposes a conceptual framework for mapping digital religion. Four types of that which is religious on the Internet are presented based on influential classification by Helland. He introduced (1) <i>religion online</i> (sites that provide information without interactivity) and (2) <i>online religion</i> (interactivity and participation). Helland’s concept is developed by, among others, adding two types: (3) <i>innovative religion</i> (new religious movements, cults, etc.) and (4) <i>traditional religion</i> (e.g., Christianity or Islam). Each type is illustrated by selected examples and these are a result of a larger project. The examples are grouped into three areas: (1) religious influencers, (2) online rituals and (3) cyber-religions (parody religions). Additionally, the visual frame for mapping digital religion is presented including the examples mentioned. The presented framework attempts to improve Helland’s classification by considering a more dynamic nature of digital religion. The model is just one possible way for mapping digital religion and thus should be developed further. These and other future research threads are characterized.
topic digital religion
media and religion
online religion
religion online
religious influencers
online rituals
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/6/373
work_keys_str_mv AT piotrsiuda mappingdigitalreligionexploringtheneedfornewtypologies
_version_ 1721414098658263040