Experimental investigations on the performance and emissions characteristics of dual biodiesel blends on a varying compression ratio diesel engine
Abstract The present work discusses the performance and emissions characterization of dual biodiesel sample blends on a varying compression ratio diesel engine. The dual biodiesel blends were obtained by blending two biodiesels (Mahua and Jatropha) in equal proportions volume (1:1, v/v) with mineral...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer
2021-05-01
|
Series: | SN Applied Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04618-0 |
id |
doaj-53508170547347fd88f5f3b5dcaf3bcc |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-53508170547347fd88f5f3b5dcaf3bcc2021-05-11T14:52:06ZengSpringerSN Applied Sciences2523-39632523-39712021-05-013611710.1007/s42452-021-04618-0Experimental investigations on the performance and emissions characteristics of dual biodiesel blends on a varying compression ratio diesel engineNavdeep Sharma Dugala0Gyanendra Singh Goindi1Ajay Sharma2Chandigarh UniversityChandigarh UniversityChandigarh UniversityAbstract The present work discusses the performance and emissions characterization of dual biodiesel sample blends on a varying compression ratio diesel engine. The dual biodiesel blends were obtained by blending two biodiesels (Mahua and Jatropha) in equal proportions volume (1:1, v/v) with mineral diesel. The sample blends were obtained on a ‘percentage by volume’ basis and named B10, B20, B30, and B40 (B10 was a blend of 5% each biodiesel with 90% mineral diesel and similarly for all other sample blends). All the experiments were performed at a constant engine speed of 1500 rpm, 50% loading conditions (2.6 kW), and varying compression ratios of 13.5:1, 14.5:1, 15.5:1, and 16.5:1. The results revealed that the sample blends had slightly higher brake power and mechanical efficiency with sample blends B10 to B40 had (0.15–1.58%) higher brake power and (1.07–12.42%) higher mechanical efficiency as compared to mineral diesel at a compression ratio of 16.5:1. The In-cylinder peak pressure and exhaust gas temperature were observed to be lower than mineral diesel for the sample blends B10 to B40 by 0.15–0.36 bar and 11.1–69.8 ℃, respectively. Also, the emissions of carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons were lower by 33–62%, respectively, for the sample with the highest blend percentage. However, the carbon dioxide emissions were found to be higher by 42.85% than mineral diesel. From the overall performance and characterization, it is concluded that B20 had optimum properties and blend percentage to be a better substitute fuel for mineral diesel among all the tested samples.https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04618-0Mahua and Jatropha biodieselDual biodieselEngine performanceCombustion characteristicsExhaust emission propertiesVariable compression ratio |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Navdeep Sharma Dugala Gyanendra Singh Goindi Ajay Sharma |
spellingShingle |
Navdeep Sharma Dugala Gyanendra Singh Goindi Ajay Sharma Experimental investigations on the performance and emissions characteristics of dual biodiesel blends on a varying compression ratio diesel engine SN Applied Sciences Mahua and Jatropha biodiesel Dual biodiesel Engine performance Combustion characteristics Exhaust emission properties Variable compression ratio |
author_facet |
Navdeep Sharma Dugala Gyanendra Singh Goindi Ajay Sharma |
author_sort |
Navdeep Sharma Dugala |
title |
Experimental investigations on the performance and emissions characteristics of dual biodiesel blends on a varying compression ratio diesel engine |
title_short |
Experimental investigations on the performance and emissions characteristics of dual biodiesel blends on a varying compression ratio diesel engine |
title_full |
Experimental investigations on the performance and emissions characteristics of dual biodiesel blends on a varying compression ratio diesel engine |
title_fullStr |
Experimental investigations on the performance and emissions characteristics of dual biodiesel blends on a varying compression ratio diesel engine |
title_full_unstemmed |
Experimental investigations on the performance and emissions characteristics of dual biodiesel blends on a varying compression ratio diesel engine |
title_sort |
experimental investigations on the performance and emissions characteristics of dual biodiesel blends on a varying compression ratio diesel engine |
publisher |
Springer |
series |
SN Applied Sciences |
issn |
2523-3963 2523-3971 |
publishDate |
2021-05-01 |
description |
Abstract The present work discusses the performance and emissions characterization of dual biodiesel sample blends on a varying compression ratio diesel engine. The dual biodiesel blends were obtained by blending two biodiesels (Mahua and Jatropha) in equal proportions volume (1:1, v/v) with mineral diesel. The sample blends were obtained on a ‘percentage by volume’ basis and named B10, B20, B30, and B40 (B10 was a blend of 5% each biodiesel with 90% mineral diesel and similarly for all other sample blends). All the experiments were performed at a constant engine speed of 1500 rpm, 50% loading conditions (2.6 kW), and varying compression ratios of 13.5:1, 14.5:1, 15.5:1, and 16.5:1. The results revealed that the sample blends had slightly higher brake power and mechanical efficiency with sample blends B10 to B40 had (0.15–1.58%) higher brake power and (1.07–12.42%) higher mechanical efficiency as compared to mineral diesel at a compression ratio of 16.5:1. The In-cylinder peak pressure and exhaust gas temperature were observed to be lower than mineral diesel for the sample blends B10 to B40 by 0.15–0.36 bar and 11.1–69.8 ℃, respectively. Also, the emissions of carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons were lower by 33–62%, respectively, for the sample with the highest blend percentage. However, the carbon dioxide emissions were found to be higher by 42.85% than mineral diesel. From the overall performance and characterization, it is concluded that B20 had optimum properties and blend percentage to be a better substitute fuel for mineral diesel among all the tested samples. |
topic |
Mahua and Jatropha biodiesel Dual biodiesel Engine performance Combustion characteristics Exhaust emission properties Variable compression ratio |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04618-0 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT navdeepsharmadugala experimentalinvestigationsontheperformanceandemissionscharacteristicsofdualbiodieselblendsonavaryingcompressionratiodieselengine AT gyanendrasinghgoindi experimentalinvestigationsontheperformanceandemissionscharacteristicsofdualbiodieselblendsonavaryingcompressionratiodieselengine AT ajaysharma experimentalinvestigationsontheperformanceandemissionscharacteristicsofdualbiodieselblendsonavaryingcompressionratiodieselengine |
_version_ |
1721443873082834944 |