Corrigendum to “Multi-modal Fission in Collinear Ternary Cluster decay of 252Cf(sf,fff)” [Phys. Lett. B 746 (2015) 223]
The scale of the ordinate axis of Fig. 4 on page 226 of PLB 746 (2015) 223 was incorrect. The new version of Fig. 4 (which is “Fig. 1” in the present note) with the correct ordinate axis is given here (upper part). The lower part shows the previous version. Five potential wells and barriers are show...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2017-02-01
|
Series: | Physics Letters B |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037026931630778X |
id |
doaj-5326f9431c34462ebf3c81c6c90378bc |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5326f9431c34462ebf3c81c6c90378bc2020-11-24T22:16:59ZengElsevierPhysics Letters B0370-26931873-24452017-02-01765C40440510.1016/j.physletb.2016.12.040Corrigendum to “Multi-modal Fission in Collinear Ternary Cluster decay of 252Cf(sf,fff)” [Phys. Lett. B 746 (2015) 223]W. von Oertzen0A.K. Nasirov1R.B. Tashkodjaev2Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin, 14109, Berlin, GermanyJoint Institute for Nuclear Research, 141980, Dubna, RussiaInstitute of Nuclear Physics, 100214, Tashkent, UzbekistanThe scale of the ordinate axis of Fig. 4 on page 226 of PLB 746 (2015) 223 was incorrect. The new version of Fig. 4 (which is “Fig. 1” in the present note) with the correct ordinate axis is given here (upper part). The lower part shows the previous version. Five potential wells and barriers are shown. Considering a sequential process, two barriers are relevant for the sequential decay, with equal barriers for the symmetric cases with a smaller fragment at the center (in these cases only one barrier is shown). For the asymmetric case of 70Ni + 50Ca + 132Sn, two different barriers appear, denoted as (B1) and (B2), which correspond to the interactions of the middle cluster 50Ca with the outer nuclei 70Ni and 132Sn, respectively. In a sequential mechanism the separation of 132Sn from the other part via the barrier B2 has the smaller height, thus it is favored for the first step. For the second step the barrier (B1) between Ni and Ca, appears at smaller distances (dot-dashed curve) and is higher. The order of the barriers of the five channels is unchanged, compared to the figure in Ref. W. von Oertzen et al., Phys. Lett. B 746 (2015) 223.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037026931630778X |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
W. von Oertzen A.K. Nasirov R.B. Tashkodjaev |
spellingShingle |
W. von Oertzen A.K. Nasirov R.B. Tashkodjaev Corrigendum to “Multi-modal Fission in Collinear Ternary Cluster decay of 252Cf(sf,fff)” [Phys. Lett. B 746 (2015) 223] Physics Letters B |
author_facet |
W. von Oertzen A.K. Nasirov R.B. Tashkodjaev |
author_sort |
W. von Oertzen |
title |
Corrigendum to “Multi-modal Fission in Collinear Ternary Cluster decay of 252Cf(sf,fff)” [Phys. Lett. B 746 (2015) 223] |
title_short |
Corrigendum to “Multi-modal Fission in Collinear Ternary Cluster decay of 252Cf(sf,fff)” [Phys. Lett. B 746 (2015) 223] |
title_full |
Corrigendum to “Multi-modal Fission in Collinear Ternary Cluster decay of 252Cf(sf,fff)” [Phys. Lett. B 746 (2015) 223] |
title_fullStr |
Corrigendum to “Multi-modal Fission in Collinear Ternary Cluster decay of 252Cf(sf,fff)” [Phys. Lett. B 746 (2015) 223] |
title_full_unstemmed |
Corrigendum to “Multi-modal Fission in Collinear Ternary Cluster decay of 252Cf(sf,fff)” [Phys. Lett. B 746 (2015) 223] |
title_sort |
corrigendum to “multi-modal fission in collinear ternary cluster decay of 252cf(sf,fff)” [phys. lett. b 746 (2015) 223] |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Physics Letters B |
issn |
0370-2693 1873-2445 |
publishDate |
2017-02-01 |
description |
The scale of the ordinate axis of Fig. 4 on page 226 of PLB 746 (2015) 223 was incorrect. The new version of Fig. 4 (which is “Fig. 1” in the present note) with the correct ordinate axis is given here (upper part). The lower part shows the previous version. Five potential wells and barriers are shown. Considering a sequential process, two barriers are relevant for the sequential decay, with equal barriers for the symmetric cases with a smaller fragment at the center (in these cases only one barrier is shown). For the asymmetric case of 70Ni + 50Ca + 132Sn, two different barriers appear, denoted as (B1) and (B2), which correspond to the interactions of the middle cluster 50Ca with the outer nuclei 70Ni and 132Sn, respectively. In a sequential mechanism the separation of 132Sn from the other part via the barrier B2 has the smaller height, thus it is favored for the first step. For the second step the barrier (B1) between Ni and Ca, appears at smaller distances (dot-dashed curve) and is higher. The order of the barriers of the five channels is unchanged, compared to the figure in Ref. W. von Oertzen et al., Phys. Lett. B 746 (2015) 223. |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037026931630778X |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT wvonoertzen corrigendumtomultimodalfissionincollinearternaryclusterdecayof252cfsffffphyslettb7462015223 AT aknasirov corrigendumtomultimodalfissionincollinearternaryclusterdecayof252cfsffffphyslettb7462015223 AT rbtashkodjaev corrigendumtomultimodalfissionincollinearternaryclusterdecayof252cfsffffphyslettb7462015223 |
_version_ |
1725787142180831232 |