Improving Outcomes Defending Patient Safety: The Learning Journey in Robotic Liver Resections
Background. While laparoscopy is currently adopted for hepatic resections, robotic approaches to the liver have not gained wide acceptance. We decided to analyze the learning curve in the field of robotic liver surgery comparing short-term outcomes between the first and the second half of our series...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2019-01-01
|
Series: | BioMed Research International |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1835085 |
id |
doaj-5322e9bee0ee4c0f91ad10dfc1070962 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5322e9bee0ee4c0f91ad10dfc10709622020-11-25T02:51:25ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412019-01-01201910.1155/2019/18350851835085Improving Outcomes Defending Patient Safety: The Learning Journey in Robotic Liver ResectionsPaolo Magistri0Gian Piero Guerrini1Roberto Ballarin2Giacomo Assirati3Giuseppe Tarantino4Fabrizio Di Benedetto5Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena (MO), ItalyHepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena (MO), ItalyHepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena (MO), ItalyHepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena (MO), ItalyHepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena (MO), ItalyHepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena (MO), ItalyBackground. While laparoscopy is currently adopted for hepatic resections, robotic approaches to the liver have not gained wide acceptance. We decided to analyze the learning curve in the field of robotic liver surgery comparing short-term outcomes between the first and the second half of our series. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed demographics and clinical data of patients who underwent robotic liver resection at our institution from July 2014 through September 2017. 60 patients diagnosed with primary or secondary liver neoplasms or hydatid disease were included in this study. ASA PS >3, heart failure, respiratory insufficiency, and general contraindication to pneumoperitoneum were exclusion criteria. Results. 60 patients were included. We observed a statistically significant decrease in operative time (p<0.001), intraoperative blood loss (p=0.01), and postoperative complications (p<0.001) after 30 cases. From the interpretation of the CUSUM curve, the time of operation appears to be significantly reduced after the first 30 operations. Discussion. This is the first European analysis of the learning curve for robotic liver resection in an HPB and liver transplant referral center. However, more studies are needed to confirm such results outside a HPB referral center. This is crucial to develop formal credentialing protocols for both junior and senior surgeons.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1835085 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Paolo Magistri Gian Piero Guerrini Roberto Ballarin Giacomo Assirati Giuseppe Tarantino Fabrizio Di Benedetto |
spellingShingle |
Paolo Magistri Gian Piero Guerrini Roberto Ballarin Giacomo Assirati Giuseppe Tarantino Fabrizio Di Benedetto Improving Outcomes Defending Patient Safety: The Learning Journey in Robotic Liver Resections BioMed Research International |
author_facet |
Paolo Magistri Gian Piero Guerrini Roberto Ballarin Giacomo Assirati Giuseppe Tarantino Fabrizio Di Benedetto |
author_sort |
Paolo Magistri |
title |
Improving Outcomes Defending Patient Safety: The Learning Journey in Robotic Liver Resections |
title_short |
Improving Outcomes Defending Patient Safety: The Learning Journey in Robotic Liver Resections |
title_full |
Improving Outcomes Defending Patient Safety: The Learning Journey in Robotic Liver Resections |
title_fullStr |
Improving Outcomes Defending Patient Safety: The Learning Journey in Robotic Liver Resections |
title_full_unstemmed |
Improving Outcomes Defending Patient Safety: The Learning Journey in Robotic Liver Resections |
title_sort |
improving outcomes defending patient safety: the learning journey in robotic liver resections |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
BioMed Research International |
issn |
2314-6133 2314-6141 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
Background. While laparoscopy is currently adopted for hepatic resections, robotic approaches to the liver have not gained wide acceptance. We decided to analyze the learning curve in the field of robotic liver surgery comparing short-term outcomes between the first and the second half of our series. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed demographics and clinical data of patients who underwent robotic liver resection at our institution from July 2014 through September 2017. 60 patients diagnosed with primary or secondary liver neoplasms or hydatid disease were included in this study. ASA PS >3, heart failure, respiratory insufficiency, and general contraindication to pneumoperitoneum were exclusion criteria. Results. 60 patients were included. We observed a statistically significant decrease in operative time (p<0.001), intraoperative blood loss (p=0.01), and postoperative complications (p<0.001) after 30 cases. From the interpretation of the CUSUM curve, the time of operation appears to be significantly reduced after the first 30 operations. Discussion. This is the first European analysis of the learning curve for robotic liver resection in an HPB and liver transplant referral center. However, more studies are needed to confirm such results outside a HPB referral center. This is crucial to develop formal credentialing protocols for both junior and senior surgeons. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1835085 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT paolomagistri improvingoutcomesdefendingpatientsafetythelearningjourneyinroboticliverresections AT gianpieroguerrini improvingoutcomesdefendingpatientsafetythelearningjourneyinroboticliverresections AT robertoballarin improvingoutcomesdefendingpatientsafetythelearningjourneyinroboticliverresections AT giacomoassirati improvingoutcomesdefendingpatientsafetythelearningjourneyinroboticliverresections AT giuseppetarantino improvingoutcomesdefendingpatientsafetythelearningjourneyinroboticliverresections AT fabriziodibenedetto improvingoutcomesdefendingpatientsafetythelearningjourneyinroboticliverresections |
_version_ |
1724734674955141120 |