Decision Making, Interest Intermediation, and Value: In Government, Public, and Private Agencies Corporatism for Work Promotion

This paper analysis decision making, interest intermediation, and value in the realm of government, public and private cooperation under corporatism to enable young third-country immigrants’ transition to work in Austria, Finland and the Czech Republic. Based on document analysis, this paper conclud...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bruno Esien Eddy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2020-12-01
Series:Danube
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2020-0019
id doaj-53206c0a2f33421d81b5441b424f6a6c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-53206c0a2f33421d81b5441b424f6a6c2021-09-05T21:00:40ZengSciendoDanube1804-82852020-12-0111432434210.2478/danb-2020-0019danb-2020-0019Decision Making, Interest Intermediation, and Value: In Government, Public, and Private Agencies Corporatism for Work PromotionBruno Esien Eddy0Charles University in Prague, Smetanovo nábřeží 6, 110 01Prague1, Czech Republic.This paper analysis decision making, interest intermediation, and value in the realm of government, public and private cooperation under corporatism to enable young third-country immigrants’ transition to work in Austria, Finland and the Czech Republic. Based on document analysis, this paper concludes a centralized delegation of authority, interest intermediations, and public values administrative devices in corporatism governance with democratic deficit that steer young third-country immigrants transition to work. However, the Czech Republic is dissimilar to Austria and Finland with the focus on relationship and partnership cooperation pattern to build contacts, where as Finland and Austria prefer cooperation in the form of coordinating varying employment objectives. The outcome points to deliberate democracy in neoliberal market-oriented setting. This is relevance to bureaucratic accountability and performance monitoring, but imperative to operational risk that may not only impair vulnerable people's belongings, but jeopardize public value accountability, sustainable finance and democratic values.https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2020-0019corporatismdecision makinginstitutionsinterest intermediationemployment systemthird-country nationals
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bruno Esien Eddy
spellingShingle Bruno Esien Eddy
Decision Making, Interest Intermediation, and Value: In Government, Public, and Private Agencies Corporatism for Work Promotion
Danube
corporatism
decision making
institutions
interest intermediation
employment system
third-country nationals
author_facet Bruno Esien Eddy
author_sort Bruno Esien Eddy
title Decision Making, Interest Intermediation, and Value: In Government, Public, and Private Agencies Corporatism for Work Promotion
title_short Decision Making, Interest Intermediation, and Value: In Government, Public, and Private Agencies Corporatism for Work Promotion
title_full Decision Making, Interest Intermediation, and Value: In Government, Public, and Private Agencies Corporatism for Work Promotion
title_fullStr Decision Making, Interest Intermediation, and Value: In Government, Public, and Private Agencies Corporatism for Work Promotion
title_full_unstemmed Decision Making, Interest Intermediation, and Value: In Government, Public, and Private Agencies Corporatism for Work Promotion
title_sort decision making, interest intermediation, and value: in government, public, and private agencies corporatism for work promotion
publisher Sciendo
series Danube
issn 1804-8285
publishDate 2020-12-01
description This paper analysis decision making, interest intermediation, and value in the realm of government, public and private cooperation under corporatism to enable young third-country immigrants’ transition to work in Austria, Finland and the Czech Republic. Based on document analysis, this paper concludes a centralized delegation of authority, interest intermediations, and public values administrative devices in corporatism governance with democratic deficit that steer young third-country immigrants transition to work. However, the Czech Republic is dissimilar to Austria and Finland with the focus on relationship and partnership cooperation pattern to build contacts, where as Finland and Austria prefer cooperation in the form of coordinating varying employment objectives. The outcome points to deliberate democracy in neoliberal market-oriented setting. This is relevance to bureaucratic accountability and performance monitoring, but imperative to operational risk that may not only impair vulnerable people's belongings, but jeopardize public value accountability, sustainable finance and democratic values.
topic corporatism
decision making
institutions
interest intermediation
employment system
third-country nationals
url https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2020-0019
work_keys_str_mv AT brunoesieneddy decisionmakinginterestintermediationandvalueingovernmentpublicandprivateagenciescorporatismforworkpromotion
_version_ 1717782481594220544