Ang (1–7) is a modulator of the vasoconstrictor actions of Ang I and Ang II
Introduction: The role of angiotensin (Ang) (1–7) on the vasoconstrictor effect induced by angiotensins could be different in the presence of an ACE inhibitor or an ARB because Ang II is formed through several pathways. Therefore, the role of Ang (1–7) in Ang I and Ang II contraction was evaluated i...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi - SAGE Publishing
2015-06-01
|
Series: | Journal of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/1470320314563560 |
id |
doaj-531ef128bb9242bca4b2249c4e6f534e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-531ef128bb9242bca4b2249c4e6f534e2021-05-02T19:10:56ZengHindawi - SAGE PublishingJournal of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System1470-32031752-89762015-06-011610.1177/1470320314563560Ang (1–7) is a modulator of the vasoconstrictor actions of Ang I and Ang IIJazmín Flores-Monroy0Ignacio Valencia-Hernández1Luisa Martínez-Aguilar2Laboratorio de Farmacodinamia, Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politecnico Nacional, MexicoLaboratorio de Farmacodinamia, Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politecnico Nacional, MexicoLaboratorio de Farmacología del Miocardio, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Cuautitlán, Universidad Nacional Autónioma de México, MexicoIntroduction: The role of angiotensin (Ang) (1–7) on the vasoconstrictor effect induced by angiotensins could be different in the presence of an ACE inhibitor or an ARB because Ang II is formed through several pathways. Therefore, the role of Ang (1–7) in Ang I and Ang II contraction was evaluated in aortas from Wistar rats after 48-hour coronary occlusion treated with captopril or losartan. Methods: Concentration-response curves to Ang I or Ang II were conducted in the absence or presence of Ang (1–7) and A779: a) sham group; b) 48-hour coronary occlusion; c) treated with captopril or d) losartan (3.1 mg/kg, i.m.). Results: Captopril caused a significant increase in the contractile effect of Ang I and Ang II, while losartan reduced it. The presence of Ang (1–7) in the captopril group showed a reduction of the contraction compared to the sham group, while the treatment with losartan did not show a significant difference. Ang (1–7) presents effects different from Ang I or Ang II. Conclusion: Ang (1–7) showed a modulatory role, suggesting Ang I did as well after treatment with an ACE inhibitor but not with an AT 1 receptor antagonist.https://doi.org/10.1177/1470320314563560 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jazmín Flores-Monroy Ignacio Valencia-Hernández Luisa Martínez-Aguilar |
spellingShingle |
Jazmín Flores-Monroy Ignacio Valencia-Hernández Luisa Martínez-Aguilar Ang (1–7) is a modulator of the vasoconstrictor actions of Ang I and Ang II Journal of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System |
author_facet |
Jazmín Flores-Monroy Ignacio Valencia-Hernández Luisa Martínez-Aguilar |
author_sort |
Jazmín Flores-Monroy |
title |
Ang (1–7) is a modulator of the vasoconstrictor actions of Ang I and Ang II |
title_short |
Ang (1–7) is a modulator of the vasoconstrictor actions of Ang I and Ang II |
title_full |
Ang (1–7) is a modulator of the vasoconstrictor actions of Ang I and Ang II |
title_fullStr |
Ang (1–7) is a modulator of the vasoconstrictor actions of Ang I and Ang II |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ang (1–7) is a modulator of the vasoconstrictor actions of Ang I and Ang II |
title_sort |
ang (1–7) is a modulator of the vasoconstrictor actions of ang i and ang ii |
publisher |
Hindawi - SAGE Publishing |
series |
Journal of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System |
issn |
1470-3203 1752-8976 |
publishDate |
2015-06-01 |
description |
Introduction: The role of angiotensin (Ang) (1–7) on the vasoconstrictor effect induced by angiotensins could be different in the presence of an ACE inhibitor or an ARB because Ang II is formed through several pathways. Therefore, the role of Ang (1–7) in Ang I and Ang II contraction was evaluated in aortas from Wistar rats after 48-hour coronary occlusion treated with captopril or losartan. Methods: Concentration-response curves to Ang I or Ang II were conducted in the absence or presence of Ang (1–7) and A779: a) sham group; b) 48-hour coronary occlusion; c) treated with captopril or d) losartan (3.1 mg/kg, i.m.). Results: Captopril caused a significant increase in the contractile effect of Ang I and Ang II, while losartan reduced it. The presence of Ang (1–7) in the captopril group showed a reduction of the contraction compared to the sham group, while the treatment with losartan did not show a significant difference. Ang (1–7) presents effects different from Ang I or Ang II. Conclusion: Ang (1–7) showed a modulatory role, suggesting Ang I did as well after treatment with an ACE inhibitor but not with an AT 1 receptor antagonist. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/1470320314563560 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jazminfloresmonroy ang17isamodulatorofthevasoconstrictoractionsofangiandangii AT ignaciovalenciahernandez ang17isamodulatorofthevasoconstrictoractionsofangiandangii AT luisamartinezaguilar ang17isamodulatorofthevasoconstrictoractionsofangiandangii |
_version_ |
1721488519601324032 |