Ang (1–7) is a modulator of the vasoconstrictor actions of Ang I and Ang II

Introduction: The role of angiotensin (Ang) (1–7) on the vasoconstrictor effect induced by angiotensins could be different in the presence of an ACE inhibitor or an ARB because Ang II is formed through several pathways. Therefore, the role of Ang (1–7) in Ang I and Ang II contraction was evaluated i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jazmín Flores-Monroy, Ignacio Valencia-Hernández, Luisa Martínez-Aguilar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi - SAGE Publishing 2015-06-01
Series:Journal of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1470320314563560
id doaj-531ef128bb9242bca4b2249c4e6f534e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-531ef128bb9242bca4b2249c4e6f534e2021-05-02T19:10:56ZengHindawi - SAGE PublishingJournal of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System1470-32031752-89762015-06-011610.1177/1470320314563560Ang (1–7) is a modulator of the vasoconstrictor actions of Ang I and Ang IIJazmín Flores-Monroy0Ignacio Valencia-Hernández1Luisa Martínez-Aguilar2Laboratorio de Farmacodinamia, Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politecnico Nacional, MexicoLaboratorio de Farmacodinamia, Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politecnico Nacional, MexicoLaboratorio de Farmacología del Miocardio, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Cuautitlán, Universidad Nacional Autónioma de México, MexicoIntroduction: The role of angiotensin (Ang) (1–7) on the vasoconstrictor effect induced by angiotensins could be different in the presence of an ACE inhibitor or an ARB because Ang II is formed through several pathways. Therefore, the role of Ang (1–7) in Ang I and Ang II contraction was evaluated in aortas from Wistar rats after 48-hour coronary occlusion treated with captopril or losartan. Methods: Concentration-response curves to Ang I or Ang II were conducted in the absence or presence of Ang (1–7) and A779: a) sham group; b) 48-hour coronary occlusion; c) treated with captopril or d) losartan (3.1 mg/kg, i.m.). Results: Captopril caused a significant increase in the contractile effect of Ang I and Ang II, while losartan reduced it. The presence of Ang (1–7) in the captopril group showed a reduction of the contraction compared to the sham group, while the treatment with losartan did not show a significant difference. Ang (1–7) presents effects different from Ang I or Ang II. Conclusion: Ang (1–7) showed a modulatory role, suggesting Ang I did as well after treatment with an ACE inhibitor but not with an AT 1 receptor antagonist.https://doi.org/10.1177/1470320314563560
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jazmín Flores-Monroy
Ignacio Valencia-Hernández
Luisa Martínez-Aguilar
spellingShingle Jazmín Flores-Monroy
Ignacio Valencia-Hernández
Luisa Martínez-Aguilar
Ang (1–7) is a modulator of the vasoconstrictor actions of Ang I and Ang II
Journal of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System
author_facet Jazmín Flores-Monroy
Ignacio Valencia-Hernández
Luisa Martínez-Aguilar
author_sort Jazmín Flores-Monroy
title Ang (1–7) is a modulator of the vasoconstrictor actions of Ang I and Ang II
title_short Ang (1–7) is a modulator of the vasoconstrictor actions of Ang I and Ang II
title_full Ang (1–7) is a modulator of the vasoconstrictor actions of Ang I and Ang II
title_fullStr Ang (1–7) is a modulator of the vasoconstrictor actions of Ang I and Ang II
title_full_unstemmed Ang (1–7) is a modulator of the vasoconstrictor actions of Ang I and Ang II
title_sort ang (1–7) is a modulator of the vasoconstrictor actions of ang i and ang ii
publisher Hindawi - SAGE Publishing
series Journal of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System
issn 1470-3203
1752-8976
publishDate 2015-06-01
description Introduction: The role of angiotensin (Ang) (1–7) on the vasoconstrictor effect induced by angiotensins could be different in the presence of an ACE inhibitor or an ARB because Ang II is formed through several pathways. Therefore, the role of Ang (1–7) in Ang I and Ang II contraction was evaluated in aortas from Wistar rats after 48-hour coronary occlusion treated with captopril or losartan. Methods: Concentration-response curves to Ang I or Ang II were conducted in the absence or presence of Ang (1–7) and A779: a) sham group; b) 48-hour coronary occlusion; c) treated with captopril or d) losartan (3.1 mg/kg, i.m.). Results: Captopril caused a significant increase in the contractile effect of Ang I and Ang II, while losartan reduced it. The presence of Ang (1–7) in the captopril group showed a reduction of the contraction compared to the sham group, while the treatment with losartan did not show a significant difference. Ang (1–7) presents effects different from Ang I or Ang II. Conclusion: Ang (1–7) showed a modulatory role, suggesting Ang I did as well after treatment with an ACE inhibitor but not with an AT 1 receptor antagonist.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1470320314563560
work_keys_str_mv AT jazminfloresmonroy ang17isamodulatorofthevasoconstrictoractionsofangiandangii
AT ignaciovalenciahernandez ang17isamodulatorofthevasoconstrictoractionsofangiandangii
AT luisamartinezaguilar ang17isamodulatorofthevasoconstrictoractionsofangiandangii
_version_ 1721488519601324032