Model-Free Optimized Tracking Control Heuristic
Many tracking control solutions proposed in the literature rely on various forms of tracking error signals at the expense of possibly overlooking other dynamic criteria, such as optimizing the control effort, overshoot, and settling time, for example. In this article, a model-free control architectu...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-06-01
|
Series: | Robotics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2218-6581/9/3/49 |
id |
doaj-531d960b569840539fca77e2017e8a53 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-531d960b569840539fca77e2017e8a532020-11-25T03:54:32ZengMDPI AGRobotics2218-65812020-06-019494910.3390/robotics9030049Model-Free Optimized Tracking Control HeuristicNing Wang0Mohammed Abouheaf1Wail Gueaieb2Nabil Nahas3School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, CanadaSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, CanadaSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, CanadaFaculté d’administration, Université de Moncton, Moncton, NB E1A 3E9, CanadaMany tracking control solutions proposed in the literature rely on various forms of tracking error signals at the expense of possibly overlooking other dynamic criteria, such as optimizing the control effort, overshoot, and settling time, for example. In this article, a model-free control architectural framework is presented to track reference signals while optimizing other criteria as per the designer’s preference. The control architecture is model-free in the sense that the plant’s dynamics do not have to be known in advance. To this end, we propose and compare four tracking control algorithms which synergistically integrate a few machine learning tools to compromise between tracking a reference signal and optimizing a user-defined dynamic cost function. This is accomplished via two orchestrated control loops, one for tracking and one for optimization. Two control algorithms are designed and compared for the tracking loop. The first is based on reinforcement learning while the second is based on nonlinear threshold accepting technique. The optimization control loop is implemented using an artificial neural network. Each controller is trained offline before being integrated in the aggregate control system. Simulation results of three scenarios with various complexities demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed control schemes in forcing the tracking error to converge while minimizing a pre-defined system-wide objective function.https://www.mdpi.com/2218-6581/9/3/49tracking controlmachine learningreinforcement learningneural networksnonlinear threshold accepting heuristicflexible-wing aircraft. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ning Wang Mohammed Abouheaf Wail Gueaieb Nabil Nahas |
spellingShingle |
Ning Wang Mohammed Abouheaf Wail Gueaieb Nabil Nahas Model-Free Optimized Tracking Control Heuristic Robotics tracking control machine learning reinforcement learning neural networks nonlinear threshold accepting heuristic flexible-wing aircraft. |
author_facet |
Ning Wang Mohammed Abouheaf Wail Gueaieb Nabil Nahas |
author_sort |
Ning Wang |
title |
Model-Free Optimized Tracking Control Heuristic |
title_short |
Model-Free Optimized Tracking Control Heuristic |
title_full |
Model-Free Optimized Tracking Control Heuristic |
title_fullStr |
Model-Free Optimized Tracking Control Heuristic |
title_full_unstemmed |
Model-Free Optimized Tracking Control Heuristic |
title_sort |
model-free optimized tracking control heuristic |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Robotics |
issn |
2218-6581 |
publishDate |
2020-06-01 |
description |
Many tracking control solutions proposed in the literature rely on various forms of tracking error signals at the expense of possibly overlooking other dynamic criteria, such as optimizing the control effort, overshoot, and settling time, for example. In this article, a model-free control architectural framework is presented to track reference signals while optimizing other criteria as per the designer’s preference. The control architecture is model-free in the sense that the plant’s dynamics do not have to be known in advance. To this end, we propose and compare four tracking control algorithms which synergistically integrate a few machine learning tools to compromise between tracking a reference signal and optimizing a user-defined dynamic cost function. This is accomplished via two orchestrated control loops, one for tracking and one for optimization. Two control algorithms are designed and compared for the tracking loop. The first is based on reinforcement learning while the second is based on nonlinear threshold accepting technique. The optimization control loop is implemented using an artificial neural network. Each controller is trained offline before being integrated in the aggregate control system. Simulation results of three scenarios with various complexities demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed control schemes in forcing the tracking error to converge while minimizing a pre-defined system-wide objective function. |
topic |
tracking control machine learning reinforcement learning neural networks nonlinear threshold accepting heuristic flexible-wing aircraft. |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2218-6581/9/3/49 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ningwang modelfreeoptimizedtrackingcontrolheuristic AT mohammedabouheaf modelfreeoptimizedtrackingcontrolheuristic AT wailgueaieb modelfreeoptimizedtrackingcontrolheuristic AT nabilnahas modelfreeoptimizedtrackingcontrolheuristic |
_version_ |
1724473154652340224 |