Produção de mel nos biomas Amazônia, Cerrado e Pantanal, em Mato Grosso, no período de 2002 a 2011
Beekeeping is an economic activity that uses the natural environment without forest degradation and promotes the service of pollination of the species cultivated in an anthropic environment. The purpose of this study was to analyze honey production in Mato Grosso biomes of the Amazon, Cerrado (Bushl...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Federal do Paraná
2016-12-01
|
Series: | Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://revistas.ufpr.br/made/article/view/46505/30132 |
id |
doaj-5301345956e24ab6a4285b030427f25b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5301345956e24ab6a4285b030427f25b2021-03-02T07:14:31ZengUniversidade Federal do ParanáDesenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente1518-952X2176-91092016-12-013915917110.5380/dma.v39i0.46505Produção de mel nos biomas Amazônia, Cerrado e Pantanal, em Mato Grosso, no período de 2002 a 2011Jennifer Oberger Ferreira0Carla Galbiati1Sandra Mara Alves da Silva Neves2Mirian Raquel da Silva Miranda3Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Ambientais, Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso (Unemat)Departamento de Agronomia, Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso (Unemat)Departamento de Geografia, Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso (Unemat)Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ambiente e Sistemas de Produção Agrícola, Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso (Unemat)Beekeeping is an economic activity that uses the natural environment without forest degradation and promotes the service of pollination of the species cultivated in an anthropic environment. The purpose of this study was to analyze honey production in Mato Grosso biomes of the Amazon, Cerrado (Bushlands) and Pantanal (Swamplands) from 2002 to 2011. Information on the production of honey by each municipality was obtained from the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics database (IBGE). The delimitation of the municipalities for each biome was defined according to IBGE. The production of honey was the greatest in the Amazon, with 46.88% of the State production and the participation of 58 municipalities from this biome; Cerrado (Bushlands) produced 42% of the State’s honey with the participation of 50 producing municipalities, and Pantanal (Swamplands) produced 10.82% of the honey with 8 municipalities. We conclude that the Mato Grosso biomes showed beekeeping potential, with greater productive capacity in Pantanal (Swamplands) due to its higher productivity rate. http://revistas.ufpr.br/made/article/view/46505/30132beekeepingland-use and occupationremote sensingenvironmental conservation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jennifer Oberger Ferreira Carla Galbiati Sandra Mara Alves da Silva Neves Mirian Raquel da Silva Miranda |
spellingShingle |
Jennifer Oberger Ferreira Carla Galbiati Sandra Mara Alves da Silva Neves Mirian Raquel da Silva Miranda Produção de mel nos biomas Amazônia, Cerrado e Pantanal, em Mato Grosso, no período de 2002 a 2011 Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente beekeeping land-use and occupation remote sensing environmental conservation |
author_facet |
Jennifer Oberger Ferreira Carla Galbiati Sandra Mara Alves da Silva Neves Mirian Raquel da Silva Miranda |
author_sort |
Jennifer Oberger Ferreira |
title |
Produção de mel nos biomas Amazônia, Cerrado e Pantanal, em Mato Grosso, no período de 2002 a 2011 |
title_short |
Produção de mel nos biomas Amazônia, Cerrado e Pantanal, em Mato Grosso, no período de 2002 a 2011 |
title_full |
Produção de mel nos biomas Amazônia, Cerrado e Pantanal, em Mato Grosso, no período de 2002 a 2011 |
title_fullStr |
Produção de mel nos biomas Amazônia, Cerrado e Pantanal, em Mato Grosso, no período de 2002 a 2011 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Produção de mel nos biomas Amazônia, Cerrado e Pantanal, em Mato Grosso, no período de 2002 a 2011 |
title_sort |
produção de mel nos biomas amazônia, cerrado e pantanal, em mato grosso, no período de 2002 a 2011 |
publisher |
Universidade Federal do Paraná |
series |
Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente |
issn |
1518-952X 2176-9109 |
publishDate |
2016-12-01 |
description |
Beekeeping is an economic activity that uses the natural environment without forest degradation and promotes the service of pollination of the species cultivated in an anthropic environment. The purpose of this study was to analyze honey production in Mato Grosso biomes of the Amazon, Cerrado (Bushlands) and Pantanal (Swamplands) from 2002 to 2011. Information on the production of honey by each municipality was obtained from the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics database (IBGE). The delimitation of the municipalities for each biome was defined according to IBGE. The production of honey was the greatest in the Amazon, with 46.88% of the State production and the participation of 58 municipalities from this biome; Cerrado (Bushlands) produced 42% of the State’s honey with the participation of 50 producing municipalities, and Pantanal (Swamplands) produced 10.82% of the honey with 8 municipalities. We conclude that the Mato Grosso biomes showed beekeeping potential, with greater productive capacity in Pantanal (Swamplands) due to its higher productivity rate.
|
topic |
beekeeping land-use and occupation remote sensing environmental conservation |
url |
http://revistas.ufpr.br/made/article/view/46505/30132 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jenniferobergerferreira producaodemelnosbiomasamazoniacerradoepantanalemmatogrossonoperiodode2002a2011 AT carlagalbiati producaodemelnosbiomasamazoniacerradoepantanalemmatogrossonoperiodode2002a2011 AT sandramaraalvesdasilvaneves producaodemelnosbiomasamazoniacerradoepantanalemmatogrossonoperiodode2002a2011 AT mirianraqueldasilvamiranda producaodemelnosbiomasamazoniacerradoepantanalemmatogrossonoperiodode2002a2011 |
_version_ |
1724241645706149888 |