Produção de mel nos biomas Amazônia, Cerrado e Pantanal, em Mato Grosso, no período de 2002 a 2011

Beekeeping is an economic activity that uses the natural environment without forest degradation and promotes the service of pollination of the species cultivated in an anthropic environment. The purpose of this study was to analyze honey production in Mato Grosso biomes of the Amazon, Cerrado (Bushl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jennifer Oberger Ferreira, Carla Galbiati, Sandra Mara Alves da Silva Neves, Mirian Raquel da Silva Miranda
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Federal do Paraná 2016-12-01
Series:Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente
Subjects:
Online Access:http://revistas.ufpr.br/made/article/view/46505/30132
id doaj-5301345956e24ab6a4285b030427f25b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5301345956e24ab6a4285b030427f25b2021-03-02T07:14:31ZengUniversidade Federal do ParanáDesenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente1518-952X2176-91092016-12-013915917110.5380/dma.v39i0.46505Produção de mel nos biomas Amazônia, Cerrado e Pantanal, em Mato Grosso, no período de 2002 a 2011Jennifer Oberger Ferreira0Carla Galbiati1Sandra Mara Alves da Silva Neves2Mirian Raquel da Silva Miranda3Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Ambientais, Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso (Unemat)Departamento de Agronomia, Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso (Unemat)Departamento de Geografia, Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso (Unemat)Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ambiente e Sistemas de Produção Agrícola, Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso (Unemat)Beekeeping is an economic activity that uses the natural environment without forest degradation and promotes the service of pollination of the species cultivated in an anthropic environment. The purpose of this study was to analyze honey production in Mato Grosso biomes of the Amazon, Cerrado (Bushlands) and Pantanal (Swamplands) from 2002 to 2011. Information on the production of honey by each municipality was obtained from the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics database (IBGE). The delimitation of the municipalities for each biome was defined according to IBGE. The production of honey was the greatest in the Amazon, with 46.88% of the State production and the participation of 58 municipalities from this biome; Cerrado (Bushlands) produced 42% of the State’s honey with the participation of 50 producing municipalities, and Pantanal (Swamplands) produced 10.82% of the honey with 8 municipalities. We conclude that the Mato Grosso biomes showed beekeeping potential, with greater productive capacity in Pantanal (Swamplands) due to its higher productivity rate. http://revistas.ufpr.br/made/article/view/46505/30132beekeepingland-use and occupationremote sensingenvironmental conservation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jennifer Oberger Ferreira
Carla Galbiati
Sandra Mara Alves da Silva Neves
Mirian Raquel da Silva Miranda
spellingShingle Jennifer Oberger Ferreira
Carla Galbiati
Sandra Mara Alves da Silva Neves
Mirian Raquel da Silva Miranda
Produção de mel nos biomas Amazônia, Cerrado e Pantanal, em Mato Grosso, no período de 2002 a 2011
Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente
beekeeping
land-use and occupation
remote sensing
environmental conservation
author_facet Jennifer Oberger Ferreira
Carla Galbiati
Sandra Mara Alves da Silva Neves
Mirian Raquel da Silva Miranda
author_sort Jennifer Oberger Ferreira
title Produção de mel nos biomas Amazônia, Cerrado e Pantanal, em Mato Grosso, no período de 2002 a 2011
title_short Produção de mel nos biomas Amazônia, Cerrado e Pantanal, em Mato Grosso, no período de 2002 a 2011
title_full Produção de mel nos biomas Amazônia, Cerrado e Pantanal, em Mato Grosso, no período de 2002 a 2011
title_fullStr Produção de mel nos biomas Amazônia, Cerrado e Pantanal, em Mato Grosso, no período de 2002 a 2011
title_full_unstemmed Produção de mel nos biomas Amazônia, Cerrado e Pantanal, em Mato Grosso, no período de 2002 a 2011
title_sort produção de mel nos biomas amazônia, cerrado e pantanal, em mato grosso, no período de 2002 a 2011
publisher Universidade Federal do Paraná
series Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente
issn 1518-952X
2176-9109
publishDate 2016-12-01
description Beekeeping is an economic activity that uses the natural environment without forest degradation and promotes the service of pollination of the species cultivated in an anthropic environment. The purpose of this study was to analyze honey production in Mato Grosso biomes of the Amazon, Cerrado (Bushlands) and Pantanal (Swamplands) from 2002 to 2011. Information on the production of honey by each municipality was obtained from the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics database (IBGE). The delimitation of the municipalities for each biome was defined according to IBGE. The production of honey was the greatest in the Amazon, with 46.88% of the State production and the participation of 58 municipalities from this biome; Cerrado (Bushlands) produced 42% of the State’s honey with the participation of 50 producing municipalities, and Pantanal (Swamplands) produced 10.82% of the honey with 8 municipalities. We conclude that the Mato Grosso biomes showed beekeeping potential, with greater productive capacity in Pantanal (Swamplands) due to its higher productivity rate.
topic beekeeping
land-use and occupation
remote sensing
environmental conservation
url http://revistas.ufpr.br/made/article/view/46505/30132
work_keys_str_mv AT jenniferobergerferreira producaodemelnosbiomasamazoniacerradoepantanalemmatogrossonoperiodode2002a2011
AT carlagalbiati producaodemelnosbiomasamazoniacerradoepantanalemmatogrossonoperiodode2002a2011
AT sandramaraalvesdasilvaneves producaodemelnosbiomasamazoniacerradoepantanalemmatogrossonoperiodode2002a2011
AT mirianraqueldasilvamiranda producaodemelnosbiomasamazoniacerradoepantanalemmatogrossonoperiodode2002a2011
_version_ 1724241645706149888