Tumour Relapse Prediction Using Multiparametric MR Data Recorded during Follow-Up of GBM Patients

Purpose. We have focused on finding a classifier that best discriminates between tumour progression and regression based on multiparametric MR data retrieved from follow-up GBM patients. Materials and Methods. Multiparametric MR data consisting of conventional and advanced MRI (perfusion, diffusion,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adrian Ion-Margineanu, Sofie Van Cauter, Diana M. Sima, Frederik Maes, Stefaan W. Van Gool, Stefan Sunaert, Uwe Himmelreich, Sabine Van Huffel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2015-01-01
Series:BioMed Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/842923
id doaj-52ff113252cb46d1861f9d7ca9cfa3ce
record_format Article
spelling doaj-52ff113252cb46d1861f9d7ca9cfa3ce2020-11-24T23:38:46ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412015-01-01201510.1155/2015/842923842923Tumour Relapse Prediction Using Multiparametric MR Data Recorded during Follow-Up of GBM PatientsAdrian Ion-Margineanu0Sofie Van Cauter1Diana M. Sima2Frederik Maes3Stefaan W. Van Gool4Stefan Sunaert5Uwe Himmelreich6Sabine Van Huffel7Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), STADIUS Center for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analytics, KU Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 10, P.O. Box 2446, 3001 Leuven, BelgiumDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, BelgiumDepartment of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), STADIUS Center for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analytics, KU Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 10, P.O. Box 2446, 3001 Leuven, BelgiumiMinds Medical IT, 3000 Leuven, BelgiumDepartment of Pedriatic Neuro-Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, BelgiumDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, BelgiumBiomedical MRI/MoSAIC, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, BelgiumDepartment of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), STADIUS Center for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analytics, KU Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 10, P.O. Box 2446, 3001 Leuven, BelgiumPurpose. We have focused on finding a classifier that best discriminates between tumour progression and regression based on multiparametric MR data retrieved from follow-up GBM patients. Materials and Methods. Multiparametric MR data consisting of conventional and advanced MRI (perfusion, diffusion, and spectroscopy) were acquired from 29 GBM patients treated with adjuvant therapy after surgery over a period of several months. A 27-feature vector was built for each time point, although not all features could be obtained at all time points due to missing data or quality issues. We tested classifiers using LOPO method on complete and imputed data. We measure the performance by computing BER for each time point and wBER for all time points. Results. If we train random forests, LogitBoost, or RobustBoost on data with complete features, we can differentiate between tumour progression and regression with 100% accuracy, one time point (i.e., about 1 month) earlier than the date when doctors had put a label (progressive or responsive) according to established radiological criteria. We obtain the same result when training the same classifiers solely on complete perfusion data. Conclusions. Our findings suggest that ensemble classifiers (i.e., random forests and boost classifiers) show promising results in predicting tumour progression earlier than established radiological criteria and should be further investigated.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/842923
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Adrian Ion-Margineanu
Sofie Van Cauter
Diana M. Sima
Frederik Maes
Stefaan W. Van Gool
Stefan Sunaert
Uwe Himmelreich
Sabine Van Huffel
spellingShingle Adrian Ion-Margineanu
Sofie Van Cauter
Diana M. Sima
Frederik Maes
Stefaan W. Van Gool
Stefan Sunaert
Uwe Himmelreich
Sabine Van Huffel
Tumour Relapse Prediction Using Multiparametric MR Data Recorded during Follow-Up of GBM Patients
BioMed Research International
author_facet Adrian Ion-Margineanu
Sofie Van Cauter
Diana M. Sima
Frederik Maes
Stefaan W. Van Gool
Stefan Sunaert
Uwe Himmelreich
Sabine Van Huffel
author_sort Adrian Ion-Margineanu
title Tumour Relapse Prediction Using Multiparametric MR Data Recorded during Follow-Up of GBM Patients
title_short Tumour Relapse Prediction Using Multiparametric MR Data Recorded during Follow-Up of GBM Patients
title_full Tumour Relapse Prediction Using Multiparametric MR Data Recorded during Follow-Up of GBM Patients
title_fullStr Tumour Relapse Prediction Using Multiparametric MR Data Recorded during Follow-Up of GBM Patients
title_full_unstemmed Tumour Relapse Prediction Using Multiparametric MR Data Recorded during Follow-Up of GBM Patients
title_sort tumour relapse prediction using multiparametric mr data recorded during follow-up of gbm patients
publisher Hindawi Limited
series BioMed Research International
issn 2314-6133
2314-6141
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Purpose. We have focused on finding a classifier that best discriminates between tumour progression and regression based on multiparametric MR data retrieved from follow-up GBM patients. Materials and Methods. Multiparametric MR data consisting of conventional and advanced MRI (perfusion, diffusion, and spectroscopy) were acquired from 29 GBM patients treated with adjuvant therapy after surgery over a period of several months. A 27-feature vector was built for each time point, although not all features could be obtained at all time points due to missing data or quality issues. We tested classifiers using LOPO method on complete and imputed data. We measure the performance by computing BER for each time point and wBER for all time points. Results. If we train random forests, LogitBoost, or RobustBoost on data with complete features, we can differentiate between tumour progression and regression with 100% accuracy, one time point (i.e., about 1 month) earlier than the date when doctors had put a label (progressive or responsive) according to established radiological criteria. We obtain the same result when training the same classifiers solely on complete perfusion data. Conclusions. Our findings suggest that ensemble classifiers (i.e., random forests and boost classifiers) show promising results in predicting tumour progression earlier than established radiological criteria and should be further investigated.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/842923
work_keys_str_mv AT adrianionmargineanu tumourrelapsepredictionusingmultiparametricmrdatarecordedduringfollowupofgbmpatients
AT sofievancauter tumourrelapsepredictionusingmultiparametricmrdatarecordedduringfollowupofgbmpatients
AT dianamsima tumourrelapsepredictionusingmultiparametricmrdatarecordedduringfollowupofgbmpatients
AT frederikmaes tumourrelapsepredictionusingmultiparametricmrdatarecordedduringfollowupofgbmpatients
AT stefaanwvangool tumourrelapsepredictionusingmultiparametricmrdatarecordedduringfollowupofgbmpatients
AT stefansunaert tumourrelapsepredictionusingmultiparametricmrdatarecordedduringfollowupofgbmpatients
AT uwehimmelreich tumourrelapsepredictionusingmultiparametricmrdatarecordedduringfollowupofgbmpatients
AT sabinevanhuffel tumourrelapsepredictionusingmultiparametricmrdatarecordedduringfollowupofgbmpatients
_version_ 1725515883248353280