Tumour Relapse Prediction Using Multiparametric MR Data Recorded during Follow-Up of GBM Patients
Purpose. We have focused on finding a classifier that best discriminates between tumour progression and regression based on multiparametric MR data retrieved from follow-up GBM patients. Materials and Methods. Multiparametric MR data consisting of conventional and advanced MRI (perfusion, diffusion,...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2015-01-01
|
Series: | BioMed Research International |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/842923 |
id |
doaj-52ff113252cb46d1861f9d7ca9cfa3ce |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-52ff113252cb46d1861f9d7ca9cfa3ce2020-11-24T23:38:46ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412015-01-01201510.1155/2015/842923842923Tumour Relapse Prediction Using Multiparametric MR Data Recorded during Follow-Up of GBM PatientsAdrian Ion-Margineanu0Sofie Van Cauter1Diana M. Sima2Frederik Maes3Stefaan W. Van Gool4Stefan Sunaert5Uwe Himmelreich6Sabine Van Huffel7Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), STADIUS Center for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analytics, KU Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 10, P.O. Box 2446, 3001 Leuven, BelgiumDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, BelgiumDepartment of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), STADIUS Center for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analytics, KU Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 10, P.O. Box 2446, 3001 Leuven, BelgiumiMinds Medical IT, 3000 Leuven, BelgiumDepartment of Pedriatic Neuro-Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, BelgiumDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, BelgiumBiomedical MRI/MoSAIC, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, BelgiumDepartment of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), STADIUS Center for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analytics, KU Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 10, P.O. Box 2446, 3001 Leuven, BelgiumPurpose. We have focused on finding a classifier that best discriminates between tumour progression and regression based on multiparametric MR data retrieved from follow-up GBM patients. Materials and Methods. Multiparametric MR data consisting of conventional and advanced MRI (perfusion, diffusion, and spectroscopy) were acquired from 29 GBM patients treated with adjuvant therapy after surgery over a period of several months. A 27-feature vector was built for each time point, although not all features could be obtained at all time points due to missing data or quality issues. We tested classifiers using LOPO method on complete and imputed data. We measure the performance by computing BER for each time point and wBER for all time points. Results. If we train random forests, LogitBoost, or RobustBoost on data with complete features, we can differentiate between tumour progression and regression with 100% accuracy, one time point (i.e., about 1 month) earlier than the date when doctors had put a label (progressive or responsive) according to established radiological criteria. We obtain the same result when training the same classifiers solely on complete perfusion data. Conclusions. Our findings suggest that ensemble classifiers (i.e., random forests and boost classifiers) show promising results in predicting tumour progression earlier than established radiological criteria and should be further investigated.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/842923 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Adrian Ion-Margineanu Sofie Van Cauter Diana M. Sima Frederik Maes Stefaan W. Van Gool Stefan Sunaert Uwe Himmelreich Sabine Van Huffel |
spellingShingle |
Adrian Ion-Margineanu Sofie Van Cauter Diana M. Sima Frederik Maes Stefaan W. Van Gool Stefan Sunaert Uwe Himmelreich Sabine Van Huffel Tumour Relapse Prediction Using Multiparametric MR Data Recorded during Follow-Up of GBM Patients BioMed Research International |
author_facet |
Adrian Ion-Margineanu Sofie Van Cauter Diana M. Sima Frederik Maes Stefaan W. Van Gool Stefan Sunaert Uwe Himmelreich Sabine Van Huffel |
author_sort |
Adrian Ion-Margineanu |
title |
Tumour Relapse Prediction Using Multiparametric MR Data Recorded during Follow-Up of GBM Patients |
title_short |
Tumour Relapse Prediction Using Multiparametric MR Data Recorded during Follow-Up of GBM Patients |
title_full |
Tumour Relapse Prediction Using Multiparametric MR Data Recorded during Follow-Up of GBM Patients |
title_fullStr |
Tumour Relapse Prediction Using Multiparametric MR Data Recorded during Follow-Up of GBM Patients |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tumour Relapse Prediction Using Multiparametric MR Data Recorded during Follow-Up of GBM Patients |
title_sort |
tumour relapse prediction using multiparametric mr data recorded during follow-up of gbm patients |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
BioMed Research International |
issn |
2314-6133 2314-6141 |
publishDate |
2015-01-01 |
description |
Purpose. We have focused on finding a classifier that best discriminates between tumour progression and regression based on multiparametric MR data retrieved from follow-up GBM patients. Materials and Methods. Multiparametric MR data consisting of conventional and advanced MRI (perfusion, diffusion, and spectroscopy) were acquired from 29 GBM patients treated with adjuvant therapy after surgery over a period of several months. A 27-feature vector was built for each time point, although not all features could be obtained at all time points due to missing data or quality issues. We tested classifiers using LOPO method on complete and imputed data. We measure the performance by computing BER for each time point and wBER for all time points. Results. If we train random forests, LogitBoost, or RobustBoost on data with complete features, we can differentiate between tumour progression and regression with 100% accuracy, one time point (i.e., about 1 month) earlier than the date when doctors had put a label (progressive or responsive) according to established radiological criteria. We obtain the same result when training the same classifiers solely on complete perfusion data. Conclusions. Our findings suggest that ensemble classifiers (i.e., random forests and boost classifiers) show promising results in predicting tumour progression earlier than established radiological criteria and should be further investigated. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/842923 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT adrianionmargineanu tumourrelapsepredictionusingmultiparametricmrdatarecordedduringfollowupofgbmpatients AT sofievancauter tumourrelapsepredictionusingmultiparametricmrdatarecordedduringfollowupofgbmpatients AT dianamsima tumourrelapsepredictionusingmultiparametricmrdatarecordedduringfollowupofgbmpatients AT frederikmaes tumourrelapsepredictionusingmultiparametricmrdatarecordedduringfollowupofgbmpatients AT stefaanwvangool tumourrelapsepredictionusingmultiparametricmrdatarecordedduringfollowupofgbmpatients AT stefansunaert tumourrelapsepredictionusingmultiparametricmrdatarecordedduringfollowupofgbmpatients AT uwehimmelreich tumourrelapsepredictionusingmultiparametricmrdatarecordedduringfollowupofgbmpatients AT sabinevanhuffel tumourrelapsepredictionusingmultiparametricmrdatarecordedduringfollowupofgbmpatients |
_version_ |
1725515883248353280 |