Predicting survey responses: how and why semantics shape survey statistics on organizational behaviour.
Some disciplines in the social sciences rely heavily on collecting survey responses to detect empirical relationships among variables. We explored whether these relationships were a priori predictable from the semantic properties of the survey items, using language processing algorithms which are no...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4153608?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-52fb3da0c5e14649b2d093bc69916ffd |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-52fb3da0c5e14649b2d093bc69916ffd2020-11-24T22:08:10ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0199e10636110.1371/journal.pone.0106361Predicting survey responses: how and why semantics shape survey statistics on organizational behaviour.Jan Ketil ArnulfKai Rune LarsenØyvind Lund MartinsenChih How BongSome disciplines in the social sciences rely heavily on collecting survey responses to detect empirical relationships among variables. We explored whether these relationships were a priori predictable from the semantic properties of the survey items, using language processing algorithms which are now available as new research methods. Language processing algorithms were used to calculate the semantic similarity among all items in state-of-the-art surveys from Organisational Behaviour research. These surveys covered areas such as transformational leadership, work motivation and work outcomes. This information was used to explain and predict the response patterns from real subjects. Semantic algorithms explained 60-86% of the variance in the response patterns and allowed remarkably precise prediction of survey responses from humans, except in a personality test. Even the relationships between independent and their purported dependent variables were accurately predicted. This raises concern about the empirical nature of data collected through some surveys if results are already given a priori through the way subjects are being asked. Survey response patterns seem heavily determined by semantics. Language algorithms may suggest these prior to administering a survey. This study suggests that semantic algorithms are becoming new tools for the social sciences, opening perspectives on survey responses that prevalent psychometric theory cannot explain.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4153608?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jan Ketil Arnulf Kai Rune Larsen Øyvind Lund Martinsen Chih How Bong |
spellingShingle |
Jan Ketil Arnulf Kai Rune Larsen Øyvind Lund Martinsen Chih How Bong Predicting survey responses: how and why semantics shape survey statistics on organizational behaviour. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Jan Ketil Arnulf Kai Rune Larsen Øyvind Lund Martinsen Chih How Bong |
author_sort |
Jan Ketil Arnulf |
title |
Predicting survey responses: how and why semantics shape survey statistics on organizational behaviour. |
title_short |
Predicting survey responses: how and why semantics shape survey statistics on organizational behaviour. |
title_full |
Predicting survey responses: how and why semantics shape survey statistics on organizational behaviour. |
title_fullStr |
Predicting survey responses: how and why semantics shape survey statistics on organizational behaviour. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Predicting survey responses: how and why semantics shape survey statistics on organizational behaviour. |
title_sort |
predicting survey responses: how and why semantics shape survey statistics on organizational behaviour. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2014-01-01 |
description |
Some disciplines in the social sciences rely heavily on collecting survey responses to detect empirical relationships among variables. We explored whether these relationships were a priori predictable from the semantic properties of the survey items, using language processing algorithms which are now available as new research methods. Language processing algorithms were used to calculate the semantic similarity among all items in state-of-the-art surveys from Organisational Behaviour research. These surveys covered areas such as transformational leadership, work motivation and work outcomes. This information was used to explain and predict the response patterns from real subjects. Semantic algorithms explained 60-86% of the variance in the response patterns and allowed remarkably precise prediction of survey responses from humans, except in a personality test. Even the relationships between independent and their purported dependent variables were accurately predicted. This raises concern about the empirical nature of data collected through some surveys if results are already given a priori through the way subjects are being asked. Survey response patterns seem heavily determined by semantics. Language algorithms may suggest these prior to administering a survey. This study suggests that semantic algorithms are becoming new tools for the social sciences, opening perspectives on survey responses that prevalent psychometric theory cannot explain. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4153608?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT janketilarnulf predictingsurveyresponseshowandwhysemanticsshapesurveystatisticsonorganizationalbehaviour AT kairunelarsen predictingsurveyresponseshowandwhysemanticsshapesurveystatisticsonorganizationalbehaviour AT øyvindlundmartinsen predictingsurveyresponseshowandwhysemanticsshapesurveystatisticsonorganizationalbehaviour AT chihhowbong predictingsurveyresponseshowandwhysemanticsshapesurveystatisticsonorganizationalbehaviour |
_version_ |
1725817370339966976 |