Adoption and use of digital technologies among general dental practitioners in the Netherlands.

<h4>Objectives</h4>To investigate (1) the degree of digital technology adoption among general dental practitioners, and to assess (2) which personal and practice factors are associated with technology use.<h4>Methods</h4>A questionnaire was distributed among a stratified samp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marieke M van der Zande, Ronald C Gorter, Irene H A Aartman, Daniel Wismeijer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120725
id doaj-52d661600b1349f6896325c62561fc9e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-52d661600b1349f6896325c62561fc9e2021-03-04T08:26:08ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01103e012072510.1371/journal.pone.0120725Adoption and use of digital technologies among general dental practitioners in the Netherlands.Marieke M van der ZandeRonald C GorterIrene H A AartmanDaniel Wismeijer<h4>Objectives</h4>To investigate (1) the degree of digital technology adoption among general dental practitioners, and to assess (2) which personal and practice factors are associated with technology use.<h4>Methods</h4>A questionnaire was distributed among a stratified sample of 1000 general dental practitioners in the Netherlands, to measure the use of fifteen administrative, communicative, clinical and diagnostic technologies, as well as personal factors and dental practice characteristics.<h4>Results</h4>The response rate was 31.3%; 65.1% replied to the questionnaire on paper and 34.9% online. Each specific digital technology was used by between 93.2% and 6.8% of the dentists. Administrative technologies were generally used by more dentists than clinical technologies. Dentists had adopted an average number of 6.3 ± 2.3 technologies. 22.5% were low technology users (0 to 4 technologies), 46.2% were intermediate technology users (5 to 7 technologies) and 31.3% were high technology users (8 to 12 technologies). High technology users more frequently had a specialization (p<0.001), were younger on average (p=0.024), and worked more hours per week (p=0.003) than low technology users, and invested more hours per year in professional activities (p=0.026) than intermediate technology users. High technology use was also more common for dentists working in practices with a higher average number of patients per year (p<0.001), with more dentists working in the practice (p<0.001) and with more staff (p<0.001).<h4>Conclusion</h4>With few exceptions, all dentists use some or a substantial number of digital technologies. Technology use is associated with various patterns of person-specific factors, and is higher when working in larger dental practices. The findings provide insight into the current state of digital technology adoption in dental practices. Further exploration why some dentists are more reluctant to adopt technologies than others is valuable for the dental profession's agility in adjusting to technological developments.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120725
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marieke M van der Zande
Ronald C Gorter
Irene H A Aartman
Daniel Wismeijer
spellingShingle Marieke M van der Zande
Ronald C Gorter
Irene H A Aartman
Daniel Wismeijer
Adoption and use of digital technologies among general dental practitioners in the Netherlands.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Marieke M van der Zande
Ronald C Gorter
Irene H A Aartman
Daniel Wismeijer
author_sort Marieke M van der Zande
title Adoption and use of digital technologies among general dental practitioners in the Netherlands.
title_short Adoption and use of digital technologies among general dental practitioners in the Netherlands.
title_full Adoption and use of digital technologies among general dental practitioners in the Netherlands.
title_fullStr Adoption and use of digital technologies among general dental practitioners in the Netherlands.
title_full_unstemmed Adoption and use of digital technologies among general dental practitioners in the Netherlands.
title_sort adoption and use of digital technologies among general dental practitioners in the netherlands.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description <h4>Objectives</h4>To investigate (1) the degree of digital technology adoption among general dental practitioners, and to assess (2) which personal and practice factors are associated with technology use.<h4>Methods</h4>A questionnaire was distributed among a stratified sample of 1000 general dental practitioners in the Netherlands, to measure the use of fifteen administrative, communicative, clinical and diagnostic technologies, as well as personal factors and dental practice characteristics.<h4>Results</h4>The response rate was 31.3%; 65.1% replied to the questionnaire on paper and 34.9% online. Each specific digital technology was used by between 93.2% and 6.8% of the dentists. Administrative technologies were generally used by more dentists than clinical technologies. Dentists had adopted an average number of 6.3 ± 2.3 technologies. 22.5% were low technology users (0 to 4 technologies), 46.2% were intermediate technology users (5 to 7 technologies) and 31.3% were high technology users (8 to 12 technologies). High technology users more frequently had a specialization (p<0.001), were younger on average (p=0.024), and worked more hours per week (p=0.003) than low technology users, and invested more hours per year in professional activities (p=0.026) than intermediate technology users. High technology use was also more common for dentists working in practices with a higher average number of patients per year (p<0.001), with more dentists working in the practice (p<0.001) and with more staff (p<0.001).<h4>Conclusion</h4>With few exceptions, all dentists use some or a substantial number of digital technologies. Technology use is associated with various patterns of person-specific factors, and is higher when working in larger dental practices. The findings provide insight into the current state of digital technology adoption in dental practices. Further exploration why some dentists are more reluctant to adopt technologies than others is valuable for the dental profession's agility in adjusting to technological developments.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120725
work_keys_str_mv AT mariekemvanderzande adoptionanduseofdigitaltechnologiesamonggeneraldentalpractitionersinthenetherlands
AT ronaldcgorter adoptionanduseofdigitaltechnologiesamonggeneraldentalpractitionersinthenetherlands
AT irenehaaartman adoptionanduseofdigitaltechnologiesamonggeneraldentalpractitionersinthenetherlands
AT danielwismeijer adoptionanduseofdigitaltechnologiesamonggeneraldentalpractitionersinthenetherlands
_version_ 1714807908718346240