The Silence of Heads

On the basis of considerations involving complementizers, sentence-final particles, need, aspect, tense, focus and topic, agreement morphemes, determiners, verbrelated particles and adpositions, I reach the conclusion that many more heads in the sentential projection line (and elsewhere) must be tak...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kayne Richard S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2016-06-01
Series:Studies in Chinese Linguistics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/scl-2016-0001
id doaj-52d5cb22e0bc49e8925d8890a827b199
record_format Article
spelling doaj-52d5cb22e0bc49e8925d8890a827b1992021-09-05T14:00:26ZengSciendoStudies in Chinese Linguistics1017-12742016-06-0137113710.1515/scl-2016-0001scl-2016-0001The Silence of HeadsKayne Richard S.0Department of Linguistics, New York University, 10 Washington Place #403, New York, NY 10003, USAOn the basis of considerations involving complementizers, sentence-final particles, need, aspect, tense, focus and topic, agreement morphemes, determiners, verbrelated particles and adpositions, I reach the conclusion that many more heads in the sentential projection line (and elsewhere) must be taken to be silent than is usually thought. I then argue that this state of affairs ultimately reflects the fact that every projecting head is silent.https://doi.org/10.1515/scl-2016-0001complementizer sentence-final particle silence tense feature
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kayne Richard S.
spellingShingle Kayne Richard S.
The Silence of Heads
Studies in Chinese Linguistics
complementizer
sentence-final particle
silence
tense
feature
author_facet Kayne Richard S.
author_sort Kayne Richard S.
title The Silence of Heads
title_short The Silence of Heads
title_full The Silence of Heads
title_fullStr The Silence of Heads
title_full_unstemmed The Silence of Heads
title_sort silence of heads
publisher Sciendo
series Studies in Chinese Linguistics
issn 1017-1274
publishDate 2016-06-01
description On the basis of considerations involving complementizers, sentence-final particles, need, aspect, tense, focus and topic, agreement morphemes, determiners, verbrelated particles and adpositions, I reach the conclusion that many more heads in the sentential projection line (and elsewhere) must be taken to be silent than is usually thought. I then argue that this state of affairs ultimately reflects the fact that every projecting head is silent.
topic complementizer
sentence-final particle
silence
tense
feature
url https://doi.org/10.1515/scl-2016-0001
work_keys_str_mv AT kaynerichards thesilenceofheads
AT kaynerichards silenceofheads
_version_ 1717811882254925824