| Summary: | Based on the experience of twenty years in the chair of Law and four as a synodal of oral exams, this work reflects on the main methodological errors in the presentation of various legal investigations. The confusions are either varied and randomly chosen for illustrative purposes to exemplify everyday situations in the world of learning and contemporary legal education and propose some of the possible solutions to common failures are proposed, as it is to obviate the methodology of legal research with the deduction, to confuse it with the procedural technique, to consider it as an accessory, to worry little about the sources’ accuracy, to misappropriate external ideological creations due to the incorrect use of the technology, to abound on internet sites with false information, disregard other indirect sources of information such as sites and anonymous comments, reduce the scope of knowledge to new online research and to partially use browsers in the exclusive search of jurisprudence or regulations of government agencies. Specifying these errors can lead to an improvement in the quality of the studies.
|
|---|
