Metacognitive monitoring and control in visual change detection: Implications for situation awareness and cognitive control.

Metacognitive monitoring and control of situation awareness (SA) are important for a range of safety-critical roles (e.g., air traffic control, military command and control). We examined the factors affecting these processes using a visual change detection task that included representative tactical...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ken I McAnally, Adam P Morris, Christopher Best
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5600364?pdf=render
id doaj-52cc287cfe4542298a67c5a99b05aba1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-52cc287cfe4542298a67c5a99b05aba12020-11-24T22:21:32ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01129e017603210.1371/journal.pone.0176032Metacognitive monitoring and control in visual change detection: Implications for situation awareness and cognitive control.Ken I McAnallyAdam P MorrisChristopher BestMetacognitive monitoring and control of situation awareness (SA) are important for a range of safety-critical roles (e.g., air traffic control, military command and control). We examined the factors affecting these processes using a visual change detection task that included representative tactical displays. SA was assessed by asking novice observers to detect changes to a tactical display. Metacognitive monitoring was assessed by asking observers to estimate the probability that they would correctly detect a change, either after study of the display and before the change (judgement of learning; JOL) or after the change and detection response (judgement of performance; JOP). In Experiment 1, observers failed to detect some changes to the display, indicating imperfect SA, but JOPs were reasonably well calibrated to objective performance. Experiment 2 examined JOLs and JOPs in two task contexts: with study-time limits imposed by the task or with self-pacing to meet specified performance targets. JOPs were well calibrated in both conditions as were JOLs for high performance targets. In summary, observers had limited SA, but good insight about their performance and learning for high performance targets and allocated study time appropriately.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5600364?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ken I McAnally
Adam P Morris
Christopher Best
spellingShingle Ken I McAnally
Adam P Morris
Christopher Best
Metacognitive monitoring and control in visual change detection: Implications for situation awareness and cognitive control.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Ken I McAnally
Adam P Morris
Christopher Best
author_sort Ken I McAnally
title Metacognitive monitoring and control in visual change detection: Implications for situation awareness and cognitive control.
title_short Metacognitive monitoring and control in visual change detection: Implications for situation awareness and cognitive control.
title_full Metacognitive monitoring and control in visual change detection: Implications for situation awareness and cognitive control.
title_fullStr Metacognitive monitoring and control in visual change detection: Implications for situation awareness and cognitive control.
title_full_unstemmed Metacognitive monitoring and control in visual change detection: Implications for situation awareness and cognitive control.
title_sort metacognitive monitoring and control in visual change detection: implications for situation awareness and cognitive control.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Metacognitive monitoring and control of situation awareness (SA) are important for a range of safety-critical roles (e.g., air traffic control, military command and control). We examined the factors affecting these processes using a visual change detection task that included representative tactical displays. SA was assessed by asking novice observers to detect changes to a tactical display. Metacognitive monitoring was assessed by asking observers to estimate the probability that they would correctly detect a change, either after study of the display and before the change (judgement of learning; JOL) or after the change and detection response (judgement of performance; JOP). In Experiment 1, observers failed to detect some changes to the display, indicating imperfect SA, but JOPs were reasonably well calibrated to objective performance. Experiment 2 examined JOLs and JOPs in two task contexts: with study-time limits imposed by the task or with self-pacing to meet specified performance targets. JOPs were well calibrated in both conditions as were JOLs for high performance targets. In summary, observers had limited SA, but good insight about their performance and learning for high performance targets and allocated study time appropriately.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5600364?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT kenimcanally metacognitivemonitoringandcontrolinvisualchangedetectionimplicationsforsituationawarenessandcognitivecontrol
AT adampmorris metacognitivemonitoringandcontrolinvisualchangedetectionimplicationsforsituationawarenessandcognitivecontrol
AT christopherbest metacognitivemonitoringandcontrolinvisualchangedetectionimplicationsforsituationawarenessandcognitivecontrol
_version_ 1725770704176021504