Review Essay: Knowledge, Subjectivity and Politics

The main interest of the study reviewed in this essay is in manifestations of subjectivity in the knowledge society. The first part demonstrates how the discourse on a knowledge society also constructs the dominant notion of an autonomous, self-reliant and intellectually capable subject. Then, the b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Thomas Pfister
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: FQS 2010-08-01
Series:Forum: Qualitative Social Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1531
id doaj-52ba969a7d40429388efcd421d9a7bba
record_format Article
spelling doaj-52ba969a7d40429388efcd421d9a7bba2020-11-24T22:41:44ZdeuFQS Forum: Qualitative Social Research1438-56272010-08-011131336Review Essay: Knowledge, Subjectivity and PoliticsThomas Pfister0Universität KonstanzThe main interest of the study reviewed in this essay is in manifestations of subjectivity in the knowledge society. The first part demonstrates how the discourse on a knowledge society also constructs the dominant notion of an autonomous, self-reliant and intellectually capable subject. Then, the book traces how individuals act and constitute themselves in response to the discursive call for specific forms of subjectivity, focusing on a set of citizen conferences on biomedical issues. It thus, especially in its latter part, provides original and surprising insights, but this part is given too little space compared to the first part, leaving the reader wanting more. The essay then engages in a broader debate, discussing two further points in addition to the insights of the review. First, it scrutinises the function of science, which plays a key role in those negotiations where the knowledge society is constituted and shaped. Secondly, it seeks to refine the notion of politics, which should be comprehensive yet not too general. It therefore suggests understanding politics as a gradual phenomenon, which might be omnipresent but becomes particularly manifest in certain situations. In order to analyze politics in the context of pluralizing knowledges, it especially recommends focusing on situations where agency and agonistic contestations become visible. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1003207http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1531biomedicinecitizen conferencesFoucaultgovernmentalityneoliberalismparticipationself-governancesubjectsubjectificationscienceknowledge societycivil society
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Thomas Pfister
spellingShingle Thomas Pfister
Review Essay: Knowledge, Subjectivity and Politics
Forum: Qualitative Social Research
biomedicine
citizen conferences
Foucault
governmentality
neoliberalism
participation
self-governance
subject
subjectification
science
knowledge society
civil society
author_facet Thomas Pfister
author_sort Thomas Pfister
title Review Essay: Knowledge, Subjectivity and Politics
title_short Review Essay: Knowledge, Subjectivity and Politics
title_full Review Essay: Knowledge, Subjectivity and Politics
title_fullStr Review Essay: Knowledge, Subjectivity and Politics
title_full_unstemmed Review Essay: Knowledge, Subjectivity and Politics
title_sort review essay: knowledge, subjectivity and politics
publisher FQS
series Forum: Qualitative Social Research
issn 1438-5627
publishDate 2010-08-01
description The main interest of the study reviewed in this essay is in manifestations of subjectivity in the knowledge society. The first part demonstrates how the discourse on a knowledge society also constructs the dominant notion of an autonomous, self-reliant and intellectually capable subject. Then, the book traces how individuals act and constitute themselves in response to the discursive call for specific forms of subjectivity, focusing on a set of citizen conferences on biomedical issues. It thus, especially in its latter part, provides original and surprising insights, but this part is given too little space compared to the first part, leaving the reader wanting more. The essay then engages in a broader debate, discussing two further points in addition to the insights of the review. First, it scrutinises the function of science, which plays a key role in those negotiations where the knowledge society is constituted and shaped. Secondly, it seeks to refine the notion of politics, which should be comprehensive yet not too general. It therefore suggests understanding politics as a gradual phenomenon, which might be omnipresent but becomes particularly manifest in certain situations. In order to analyze politics in the context of pluralizing knowledges, it especially recommends focusing on situations where agency and agonistic contestations become visible. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1003207
topic biomedicine
citizen conferences
Foucault
governmentality
neoliberalism
participation
self-governance
subject
subjectification
science
knowledge society
civil society
url http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1531
work_keys_str_mv AT thomaspfister reviewessayknowledgesubjectivityandpolitics
_version_ 1725701031998783488