Cecal microbiome profile of Hawaiian feral chickens and pasture-raised broiler (commercial) chickens determined using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing

ABSTRACT: This study investigated the taxonomic profile and abundance distribution of the bacterial community in the ceca of feral and pasture-raised broiler (commercial) chickens. Cecal content from feral and commercial chickens (n = 7 each) was collected, and total DNA was isolated. Next-Generatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sudhir Yadav, Kayla D. Caliboso, Jannel E. Nanquil, Jiachao Zhang, Helmut Kae, Kabi Neupane, Birendra Mishra, Rajesh Jha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-07-01
Series:Poultry Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579121002157
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT: This study investigated the taxonomic profile and abundance distribution of the bacterial community in the ceca of feral and pasture-raised broiler (commercial) chickens. Cecal content from feral and commercial chickens (n = 7 each) was collected, and total DNA was isolated. Next-Generation Sequencing (Illumina MiSeq) was performed to characterize the cecal microbiota. Specific bacteria explored were: Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Enterococcus, Escherichia, and Clostridium. At the phylum level, 92% of the bacteria belonged to Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria for both feral and commercial chickens. The proportional abundance of Firmicutes was 55.3% and 63.3%, Bacteroidetes was 32.5% and 24.4%, and Proteobacteria was 7.0% and 5.9% in the feral and commercial chickens, respectively. The alpha-diversity Shannon index (P = 0.017) and Simpson index (P = 0.038) were significantly higher for commercial than for feral chickens. Predictive functional profiling by PICRUSt showed enriched microbial metabolic pathways for L-proline biosynthesis in the feral group (P < 0.01). There were a greater percentage of specific bacteria in the feral than commercial chickens, albeit with lower diversity but a more functional microbiota. In conclusion, feral birds have distinguished microbial communities, and further microbiome analysis is mandated to know the specific functional role of individual microbiota. The difference in microbiota level between feral and commercial birds could be accounted to the scavenging nature, diverse feed ingredients, and distinct rearing localities.
ISSN:0032-5791