Comparison of D-dimer with CRP and ESR for diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection

• Main Authors: Longjiang Xiong, Siyun Li, Min Dai
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 2019-07-01
• Series: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
• Subjects: Periprosthetic joint infection; Biomarkers; D-dimer; Erythrocyte sedimentation rate; C-reactive protein
• Online Access: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-019-1282-y

Abstract Background Despite the availability of several biomarkers, the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) continues to be challenging. Serum D-dimer assessment is a widely available test that detects fibrinolytic activities and has been reported as an inflammatory biomarker. However, quite a few articles have reported the diagnostic efficiency of D-dimer for PJI. Methods This prospective study enrolled patients who had undergone total joint arthroplasty, were suspected of PJI, and also prepared for revision arthroplasty. PJI was defined using the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. In all patients, serum D-dimer level, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) level were measured preoperatively. We then compared the diagnostic efficiency of these three biomarkers. Results The median D-dimer level was significantly higher (p < 0.001) for the patients with PJI than for the patients with aseptic failure. With a sensitivity of 80.77% (95% CI, 65.62 to 95.92%) and a specificity of 79.63% (95% CI, 68.89 to 90.37%), the diagnostic efficiency of D-dimer did not outperform serum CRP (with a sensitivity of 84.61% and specificity of 64.81%) and ESR (with a sensitivity of 73.08% and specificity of 90.47%). Conclusions Serum D-dimer as a marker for the diagnosis of PJI still requires more large-scale and detailed clinical trials.