A 4-Year Follow-up Cohort Study of the Respiratory Functions in Toner-handling Workers

Background: Focusing on the respiratory function for health effect indices, we conducted a cross-sectional study on workers who did and did not handle toner to compare the longitudinal changes. Methods: Among 116 individuals who worked for a Japanese business equipment manufacturer and participated...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nobuaki Yanagi, Hiroko Kitamura, Mitsuhito Mizuno, Koichi Hata, Tetsuro Uchiyama, Hiroaki Kuga, Tetsuhiro Matsushita, Shizuka Kurosaki, Masamichi Uehara, Akira Ogami, Toshiaki Higashi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2014-12-01
Series:Safety and Health at Work
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791114000493
id doaj-5280f8b70a204c72b9065d5a34377f46
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5280f8b70a204c72b9065d5a34377f462020-11-24T23:30:48ZengElsevierSafety and Health at Work2093-79112014-12-015422222610.1016/j.shaw.2014.07.001A 4-Year Follow-up Cohort Study of the Respiratory Functions in Toner-handling WorkersNobuaki YanagiHiroko KitamuraMitsuhito MizunoKoichi HataTetsuro UchiyamaHiroaki KugaTetsuhiro MatsushitaShizuka KurosakiMasamichi UeharaAkira OgamiToshiaki HigashiBackground: Focusing on the respiratory function for health effect indices, we conducted a cross-sectional study on workers who did and did not handle toner to compare the longitudinal changes. Methods: Among 116 individuals who worked for a Japanese business equipment manufacturer and participated in the study, the analysis included 69 male workers who we were able to follow up for 4 years. We categorized the 40 workers engaged in toner-handling work as the exposed group and the 29 workers not engaged in these tasks as the referent group, and compared their respiratory function test results: peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), vital capacity (VC), predicted vital capacity (%VC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), and forced expiratory volume in 1 second as a percent of forced vital capacity (FEV1%). Results: The cross-sectional study of the respiratory function test results at the baseline and at the 5th year showed no statistically significant differences in PEFR, VC, %VC, FEV1, and FEV1% between the exposed and referent workers. Also, respiratory function time-course for 4 years was calculated and compared between the groups. No statistically significant differences were shown. Conclusion: Our study does not suggest any toner exposure effects on respiratory function. However, the number of subjects was small in our study; studies of larger populations will be desired in the future.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791114000493cohort analysisphotocopyingrespiratory function test
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nobuaki Yanagi
Hiroko Kitamura
Mitsuhito Mizuno
Koichi Hata
Tetsuro Uchiyama
Hiroaki Kuga
Tetsuhiro Matsushita
Shizuka Kurosaki
Masamichi Uehara
Akira Ogami
Toshiaki Higashi
spellingShingle Nobuaki Yanagi
Hiroko Kitamura
Mitsuhito Mizuno
Koichi Hata
Tetsuro Uchiyama
Hiroaki Kuga
Tetsuhiro Matsushita
Shizuka Kurosaki
Masamichi Uehara
Akira Ogami
Toshiaki Higashi
A 4-Year Follow-up Cohort Study of the Respiratory Functions in Toner-handling Workers
Safety and Health at Work
cohort analysis
photocopying
respiratory function test
author_facet Nobuaki Yanagi
Hiroko Kitamura
Mitsuhito Mizuno
Koichi Hata
Tetsuro Uchiyama
Hiroaki Kuga
Tetsuhiro Matsushita
Shizuka Kurosaki
Masamichi Uehara
Akira Ogami
Toshiaki Higashi
author_sort Nobuaki Yanagi
title A 4-Year Follow-up Cohort Study of the Respiratory Functions in Toner-handling Workers
title_short A 4-Year Follow-up Cohort Study of the Respiratory Functions in Toner-handling Workers
title_full A 4-Year Follow-up Cohort Study of the Respiratory Functions in Toner-handling Workers
title_fullStr A 4-Year Follow-up Cohort Study of the Respiratory Functions in Toner-handling Workers
title_full_unstemmed A 4-Year Follow-up Cohort Study of the Respiratory Functions in Toner-handling Workers
title_sort 4-year follow-up cohort study of the respiratory functions in toner-handling workers
publisher Elsevier
series Safety and Health at Work
issn 2093-7911
publishDate 2014-12-01
description Background: Focusing on the respiratory function for health effect indices, we conducted a cross-sectional study on workers who did and did not handle toner to compare the longitudinal changes. Methods: Among 116 individuals who worked for a Japanese business equipment manufacturer and participated in the study, the analysis included 69 male workers who we were able to follow up for 4 years. We categorized the 40 workers engaged in toner-handling work as the exposed group and the 29 workers not engaged in these tasks as the referent group, and compared their respiratory function test results: peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), vital capacity (VC), predicted vital capacity (%VC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), and forced expiratory volume in 1 second as a percent of forced vital capacity (FEV1%). Results: The cross-sectional study of the respiratory function test results at the baseline and at the 5th year showed no statistically significant differences in PEFR, VC, %VC, FEV1, and FEV1% between the exposed and referent workers. Also, respiratory function time-course for 4 years was calculated and compared between the groups. No statistically significant differences were shown. Conclusion: Our study does not suggest any toner exposure effects on respiratory function. However, the number of subjects was small in our study; studies of larger populations will be desired in the future.
topic cohort analysis
photocopying
respiratory function test
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791114000493
work_keys_str_mv AT nobuakiyanagi a4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers
AT hirokokitamura a4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers
AT mitsuhitomizuno a4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers
AT koichihata a4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers
AT tetsurouchiyama a4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers
AT hiroakikuga a4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers
AT tetsuhiromatsushita a4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers
AT shizukakurosaki a4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers
AT masamichiuehara a4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers
AT akiraogami a4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers
AT toshiakihigashi a4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers
AT nobuakiyanagi 4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers
AT hirokokitamura 4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers
AT mitsuhitomizuno 4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers
AT koichihata 4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers
AT tetsurouchiyama 4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers
AT hiroakikuga 4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers
AT tetsuhiromatsushita 4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers
AT shizukakurosaki 4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers
AT masamichiuehara 4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers
AT akiraogami 4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers
AT toshiakihigashi 4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers
_version_ 1725540392993030144