A Predictive Model for Damage Assessment and Deformation in Blast Walls Resulted by Hydrocarbon Explosions

In this paper, a new method is developed to find the ductility ratio in blast walls, resulted by hydrocarbon explosions. In this method, only the explosion energy and distance from the centre of explosion are required to find the damage by using simple predictive models in terms of empirical-type fo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Majid Aleyaasin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2019-01-01
Series:Advances in Civil Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5129274
id doaj-527fc647c974425e8e0a8277c21a7129
record_format Article
spelling doaj-527fc647c974425e8e0a8277c21a71292020-11-25T01:57:40ZengHindawi LimitedAdvances in Civil Engineering1687-80861687-80942019-01-01201910.1155/2019/51292745129274A Predictive Model for Damage Assessment and Deformation in Blast Walls Resulted by Hydrocarbon ExplosionsMajid Aleyaasin0Lecturer School of Engineering, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, UKIn this paper, a new method is developed to find the ductility ratio in blast walls, resulted by hydrocarbon explosions. In this method, only the explosion energy and distance from the centre of explosion are required to find the damage by using simple predictive models in terms of empirical-type formulas. The explosion model herein is a TNO multiphysic method. This provides the maximum overpressure and pulse duration in terms of the explosion length and distance from explosion centre. Thereafter, the obtained results are combined with the SDOF model of the blast wall to determine the ductility ratio and the damage. By using advanced optimisation techniques, two types of predictive models are found. In the first model, the formula is found in terms of 2 parameters of explosion length and distance from explosion centre. However, the 2nd model has 3 parameters of explosion length, distance, and also the natural period of the blast wall. These predictive models are then used to find explosion damages and ductility ratio. The results are compared with FEM analysis and pressure-impulse (P-I) method. It is shown that both types of models fit well with the outputs of the simulation. Moreover, results of both models are close to FEM analysis. The comparison tables provided in this paper show that, in the asymptotic region of P-I diagrams, results are not accurate. Therefore, this new method is superior to classical pressure-impulse (P-I) diagrams in the literature. Advantage of the new method is the easy damage assessment by using simple empirical-type formulas. Therefore, the researchers can use the method in this paper, for damage assessment in other types of blast resistive structures.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5129274
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Majid Aleyaasin
spellingShingle Majid Aleyaasin
A Predictive Model for Damage Assessment and Deformation in Blast Walls Resulted by Hydrocarbon Explosions
Advances in Civil Engineering
author_facet Majid Aleyaasin
author_sort Majid Aleyaasin
title A Predictive Model for Damage Assessment and Deformation in Blast Walls Resulted by Hydrocarbon Explosions
title_short A Predictive Model for Damage Assessment and Deformation in Blast Walls Resulted by Hydrocarbon Explosions
title_full A Predictive Model for Damage Assessment and Deformation in Blast Walls Resulted by Hydrocarbon Explosions
title_fullStr A Predictive Model for Damage Assessment and Deformation in Blast Walls Resulted by Hydrocarbon Explosions
title_full_unstemmed A Predictive Model for Damage Assessment and Deformation in Blast Walls Resulted by Hydrocarbon Explosions
title_sort predictive model for damage assessment and deformation in blast walls resulted by hydrocarbon explosions
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Advances in Civil Engineering
issn 1687-8086
1687-8094
publishDate 2019-01-01
description In this paper, a new method is developed to find the ductility ratio in blast walls, resulted by hydrocarbon explosions. In this method, only the explosion energy and distance from the centre of explosion are required to find the damage by using simple predictive models in terms of empirical-type formulas. The explosion model herein is a TNO multiphysic method. This provides the maximum overpressure and pulse duration in terms of the explosion length and distance from explosion centre. Thereafter, the obtained results are combined with the SDOF model of the blast wall to determine the ductility ratio and the damage. By using advanced optimisation techniques, two types of predictive models are found. In the first model, the formula is found in terms of 2 parameters of explosion length and distance from explosion centre. However, the 2nd model has 3 parameters of explosion length, distance, and also the natural period of the blast wall. These predictive models are then used to find explosion damages and ductility ratio. The results are compared with FEM analysis and pressure-impulse (P-I) method. It is shown that both types of models fit well with the outputs of the simulation. Moreover, results of both models are close to FEM analysis. The comparison tables provided in this paper show that, in the asymptotic region of P-I diagrams, results are not accurate. Therefore, this new method is superior to classical pressure-impulse (P-I) diagrams in the literature. Advantage of the new method is the easy damage assessment by using simple empirical-type formulas. Therefore, the researchers can use the method in this paper, for damage assessment in other types of blast resistive structures.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5129274
work_keys_str_mv AT majidaleyaasin apredictivemodelfordamageassessmentanddeformationinblastwallsresultedbyhydrocarbonexplosions
AT majidaleyaasin predictivemodelfordamageassessmentanddeformationinblastwallsresultedbyhydrocarbonexplosions
_version_ 1724973321474277376