Evidence on User-Led Innovation in Diabetes Technology (The OPEN Project): Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

BackgroundDigital innovations in health care have traditionally followed a top-down pathway, with manufacturers leading the design and production of technology-enabled solutions and those living with chronic conditions involved only as passive recipients of the end product. H...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: O'Donnell, Shane, Lewis, Dana, Marchante Fernández, María, Wäldchen, Mandy, Cleal, Bryan, Skinner, Timothy, Raile, Klemens, Tappe, Adrian, Ubben, Tebbe, Willaing, Ingrid, Hauck, Bastian, Wolf, Saskia, Braune, Katarina
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2019-11-01
Series:JMIR Research Protocols
Online Access:http://www.researchprotocols.org/2019/11/e15368/
id doaj-52717ed92f7d4cb783262e2878d29420
record_format Article
spelling doaj-52717ed92f7d4cb783262e2878d294202021-05-03T01:43:12ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Research Protocols1929-07482019-11-01811e1536810.2196/15368Evidence on User-Led Innovation in Diabetes Technology (The OPEN Project): Protocol for a Mixed Methods StudyO'Donnell, ShaneLewis, DanaMarchante Fernández, MaríaWäldchen, MandyCleal, BryanSkinner, TimothyRaile, KlemensTappe, AdrianUbben, TebbeWillaing, IngridHauck, BastianWolf, SaskiaBraune, Katarina BackgroundDigital innovations in health care have traditionally followed a top-down pathway, with manufacturers leading the design and production of technology-enabled solutions and those living with chronic conditions involved only as passive recipients of the end product. However, user-driven open-source initiatives in health care are becoming increasingly popular. An example is the growing movement of people with diabetes, who create their own “Do-It-Yourself Artificial Pancreas Systems” (DIYAPS). ObjectiveThe overall aim of this study is to establish the empirical evidence base for the clinical effectiveness and quality-of-life benefits of DIYAPS and identify the challenges and possible solutions to enable their wider diffusion. MethodsA research program comprising 5 work packages will examine the outcomes and potential for scaling up DIYAPS solutions. Quantitative and qualitative methodologies will be used to examine clinical and self-reported outcome measures of DIYAPS users. The majority of members of the research team live with type 1 diabetes and are active DIYAPS users, making Outcomes of Patients’ Evidence With Novel, Do-It-Yourself Artificial Pancreas Technology (OPEN) a unique, user-driven research project. ResultsThis project has received funding from the European Commission’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program, under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Action Research and Innovation Staff Exchange. Researchers with both academic and nonacademic backgrounds have been recruited to formulate research questions, drive the research process, and disseminate ongoing findings back to the DIYAPS community and other stakeholders. ConclusionsThe OPEN project is unique in that it is a truly patient- and user-led research project, which brings together an international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral research group, comprising health care professionals, technical developers, biomedical and social scientists, the majority of whom are also living with diabetes. Thus, it directly addresses the core research and user needs of the DIYAPS movement. As a new model of cooperation, it will highlight how researchers in academia, industry, and the patient community can create patient-centric innovation and reduce disease burden together. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)PRR1-10.2196/15368http://www.researchprotocols.org/2019/11/e15368/
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author O'Donnell, Shane
Lewis, Dana
Marchante Fernández, María
Wäldchen, Mandy
Cleal, Bryan
Skinner, Timothy
Raile, Klemens
Tappe, Adrian
Ubben, Tebbe
Willaing, Ingrid
Hauck, Bastian
Wolf, Saskia
Braune, Katarina
spellingShingle O'Donnell, Shane
Lewis, Dana
Marchante Fernández, María
Wäldchen, Mandy
Cleal, Bryan
Skinner, Timothy
Raile, Klemens
Tappe, Adrian
Ubben, Tebbe
Willaing, Ingrid
Hauck, Bastian
Wolf, Saskia
Braune, Katarina
Evidence on User-Led Innovation in Diabetes Technology (The OPEN Project): Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study
JMIR Research Protocols
author_facet O'Donnell, Shane
Lewis, Dana
Marchante Fernández, María
Wäldchen, Mandy
Cleal, Bryan
Skinner, Timothy
Raile, Klemens
Tappe, Adrian
Ubben, Tebbe
Willaing, Ingrid
Hauck, Bastian
Wolf, Saskia
Braune, Katarina
author_sort O'Donnell, Shane
title Evidence on User-Led Innovation in Diabetes Technology (The OPEN Project): Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study
title_short Evidence on User-Led Innovation in Diabetes Technology (The OPEN Project): Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study
title_full Evidence on User-Led Innovation in Diabetes Technology (The OPEN Project): Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study
title_fullStr Evidence on User-Led Innovation in Diabetes Technology (The OPEN Project): Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study
title_full_unstemmed Evidence on User-Led Innovation in Diabetes Technology (The OPEN Project): Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study
title_sort evidence on user-led innovation in diabetes technology (the open project): protocol for a mixed methods study
publisher JMIR Publications
series JMIR Research Protocols
issn 1929-0748
publishDate 2019-11-01
description BackgroundDigital innovations in health care have traditionally followed a top-down pathway, with manufacturers leading the design and production of technology-enabled solutions and those living with chronic conditions involved only as passive recipients of the end product. However, user-driven open-source initiatives in health care are becoming increasingly popular. An example is the growing movement of people with diabetes, who create their own “Do-It-Yourself Artificial Pancreas Systems” (DIYAPS). ObjectiveThe overall aim of this study is to establish the empirical evidence base for the clinical effectiveness and quality-of-life benefits of DIYAPS and identify the challenges and possible solutions to enable their wider diffusion. MethodsA research program comprising 5 work packages will examine the outcomes and potential for scaling up DIYAPS solutions. Quantitative and qualitative methodologies will be used to examine clinical and self-reported outcome measures of DIYAPS users. The majority of members of the research team live with type 1 diabetes and are active DIYAPS users, making Outcomes of Patients’ Evidence With Novel, Do-It-Yourself Artificial Pancreas Technology (OPEN) a unique, user-driven research project. ResultsThis project has received funding from the European Commission’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program, under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Action Research and Innovation Staff Exchange. Researchers with both academic and nonacademic backgrounds have been recruited to formulate research questions, drive the research process, and disseminate ongoing findings back to the DIYAPS community and other stakeholders. ConclusionsThe OPEN project is unique in that it is a truly patient- and user-led research project, which brings together an international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral research group, comprising health care professionals, technical developers, biomedical and social scientists, the majority of whom are also living with diabetes. Thus, it directly addresses the core research and user needs of the DIYAPS movement. As a new model of cooperation, it will highlight how researchers in academia, industry, and the patient community can create patient-centric innovation and reduce disease burden together. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)PRR1-10.2196/15368
url http://www.researchprotocols.org/2019/11/e15368/
work_keys_str_mv AT odonnellshane evidenceonuserledinnovationindiabetestechnologytheopenprojectprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT lewisdana evidenceonuserledinnovationindiabetestechnologytheopenprojectprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT marchantefernandezmaria evidenceonuserledinnovationindiabetestechnologytheopenprojectprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT waldchenmandy evidenceonuserledinnovationindiabetestechnologytheopenprojectprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT clealbryan evidenceonuserledinnovationindiabetestechnologytheopenprojectprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT skinnertimothy evidenceonuserledinnovationindiabetestechnologytheopenprojectprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT raileklemens evidenceonuserledinnovationindiabetestechnologytheopenprojectprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT tappeadrian evidenceonuserledinnovationindiabetestechnologytheopenprojectprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT ubbentebbe evidenceonuserledinnovationindiabetestechnologytheopenprojectprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT willaingingrid evidenceonuserledinnovationindiabetestechnologytheopenprojectprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT hauckbastian evidenceonuserledinnovationindiabetestechnologytheopenprojectprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT wolfsaskia evidenceonuserledinnovationindiabetestechnologytheopenprojectprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT braunekatarina evidenceonuserledinnovationindiabetestechnologytheopenprojectprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
_version_ 1721485569086717952