Perspective: Assessing the Flexible Acquisition, Integration, and Deployment of Human Spatial Representations and Information

Studying human spatial navigation in the lab can be challenging, particularly when including non-invasive neural measures like functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and scalp encephalography (EEG). While there is broad consensus that human spatial navigation involves both egocentric (self-ref...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael J. Starrett, Arne D. Ekstrom
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00281/full
id doaj-5254e43ae22d45cfb046257d27c5aacc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5254e43ae22d45cfb046257d27c5aacc2020-11-25T02:19:38ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience1662-51612018-07-011210.3389/fnhum.2018.00281361373Perspective: Assessing the Flexible Acquisition, Integration, and Deployment of Human Spatial Representations and InformationMichael J. Starrett0Michael J. Starrett1Michael J. Starrett2Arne D. Ekstrom3Arne D. Ekstrom4Arne D. Ekstrom5Arne D. Ekstrom6Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United StatesDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United StatesCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United StatesDepartment of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United StatesDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United StatesCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United StatesNeuroscience Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United StatesStudying human spatial navigation in the lab can be challenging, particularly when including non-invasive neural measures like functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and scalp encephalography (EEG). While there is broad consensus that human spatial navigation involves both egocentric (self-referenced) and allocentric (world-referenced) coding schemes, exactly how these can be measured in ecologically meaningful situations remains controversial. Here, we explore these two forms of representation and how we might better measure them by reviewing commonly used spatial memory tasks and proposing a new task: the relative vector discrimination (RVD) task. Additionally, we explore how different encoding modalities (desktop virtual reality, immersive virtual reality, maps, and real-world navigation) might alter how egocentric and allocentric representations manifest. Specifically, we discuss desktop virtual reality vs. more immersive forms of navigation that better approximate real-world situations, and the extent to which less immersive encoding modalities alter neural and cognitive codes engaged during navigation more generally. We conclude that while encoding modality likely alters navigation-related codes to some degree, including egocentric and allocentric representations, it does not fundamentally change the underlying representations. Considering these arguments together, we suggest that tools to study human navigation in the lab, such as desktop virtual reality, provide overall a reasonable approximation of in vivo navigation, with some caveats.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00281/fullspatial representationsspatial informationnavigationegocentricallocentricvirtual reality
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michael J. Starrett
Michael J. Starrett
Michael J. Starrett
Arne D. Ekstrom
Arne D. Ekstrom
Arne D. Ekstrom
Arne D. Ekstrom
spellingShingle Michael J. Starrett
Michael J. Starrett
Michael J. Starrett
Arne D. Ekstrom
Arne D. Ekstrom
Arne D. Ekstrom
Arne D. Ekstrom
Perspective: Assessing the Flexible Acquisition, Integration, and Deployment of Human Spatial Representations and Information
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
spatial representations
spatial information
navigation
egocentric
allocentric
virtual reality
author_facet Michael J. Starrett
Michael J. Starrett
Michael J. Starrett
Arne D. Ekstrom
Arne D. Ekstrom
Arne D. Ekstrom
Arne D. Ekstrom
author_sort Michael J. Starrett
title Perspective: Assessing the Flexible Acquisition, Integration, and Deployment of Human Spatial Representations and Information
title_short Perspective: Assessing the Flexible Acquisition, Integration, and Deployment of Human Spatial Representations and Information
title_full Perspective: Assessing the Flexible Acquisition, Integration, and Deployment of Human Spatial Representations and Information
title_fullStr Perspective: Assessing the Flexible Acquisition, Integration, and Deployment of Human Spatial Representations and Information
title_full_unstemmed Perspective: Assessing the Flexible Acquisition, Integration, and Deployment of Human Spatial Representations and Information
title_sort perspective: assessing the flexible acquisition, integration, and deployment of human spatial representations and information
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
issn 1662-5161
publishDate 2018-07-01
description Studying human spatial navigation in the lab can be challenging, particularly when including non-invasive neural measures like functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and scalp encephalography (EEG). While there is broad consensus that human spatial navigation involves both egocentric (self-referenced) and allocentric (world-referenced) coding schemes, exactly how these can be measured in ecologically meaningful situations remains controversial. Here, we explore these two forms of representation and how we might better measure them by reviewing commonly used spatial memory tasks and proposing a new task: the relative vector discrimination (RVD) task. Additionally, we explore how different encoding modalities (desktop virtual reality, immersive virtual reality, maps, and real-world navigation) might alter how egocentric and allocentric representations manifest. Specifically, we discuss desktop virtual reality vs. more immersive forms of navigation that better approximate real-world situations, and the extent to which less immersive encoding modalities alter neural and cognitive codes engaged during navigation more generally. We conclude that while encoding modality likely alters navigation-related codes to some degree, including egocentric and allocentric representations, it does not fundamentally change the underlying representations. Considering these arguments together, we suggest that tools to study human navigation in the lab, such as desktop virtual reality, provide overall a reasonable approximation of in vivo navigation, with some caveats.
topic spatial representations
spatial information
navigation
egocentric
allocentric
virtual reality
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00281/full
work_keys_str_mv AT michaeljstarrett perspectiveassessingtheflexibleacquisitionintegrationanddeploymentofhumanspatialrepresentationsandinformation
AT michaeljstarrett perspectiveassessingtheflexibleacquisitionintegrationanddeploymentofhumanspatialrepresentationsandinformation
AT michaeljstarrett perspectiveassessingtheflexibleacquisitionintegrationanddeploymentofhumanspatialrepresentationsandinformation
AT arnedekstrom perspectiveassessingtheflexibleacquisitionintegrationanddeploymentofhumanspatialrepresentationsandinformation
AT arnedekstrom perspectiveassessingtheflexibleacquisitionintegrationanddeploymentofhumanspatialrepresentationsandinformation
AT arnedekstrom perspectiveassessingtheflexibleacquisitionintegrationanddeploymentofhumanspatialrepresentationsandinformation
AT arnedekstrom perspectiveassessingtheflexibleacquisitionintegrationanddeploymentofhumanspatialrepresentationsandinformation
_version_ 1724875346360139776