Perspective: Assessing the Flexible Acquisition, Integration, and Deployment of Human Spatial Representations and Information
Studying human spatial navigation in the lab can be challenging, particularly when including non-invasive neural measures like functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and scalp encephalography (EEG). While there is broad consensus that human spatial navigation involves both egocentric (self-ref...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018-07-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Human Neuroscience |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00281/full |
id |
doaj-5254e43ae22d45cfb046257d27c5aacc |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5254e43ae22d45cfb046257d27c5aacc2020-11-25T02:19:38ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience1662-51612018-07-011210.3389/fnhum.2018.00281361373Perspective: Assessing the Flexible Acquisition, Integration, and Deployment of Human Spatial Representations and InformationMichael J. Starrett0Michael J. Starrett1Michael J. Starrett2Arne D. Ekstrom3Arne D. Ekstrom4Arne D. Ekstrom5Arne D. Ekstrom6Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United StatesDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United StatesCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United StatesDepartment of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United StatesDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United StatesCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United StatesNeuroscience Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United StatesStudying human spatial navigation in the lab can be challenging, particularly when including non-invasive neural measures like functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and scalp encephalography (EEG). While there is broad consensus that human spatial navigation involves both egocentric (self-referenced) and allocentric (world-referenced) coding schemes, exactly how these can be measured in ecologically meaningful situations remains controversial. Here, we explore these two forms of representation and how we might better measure them by reviewing commonly used spatial memory tasks and proposing a new task: the relative vector discrimination (RVD) task. Additionally, we explore how different encoding modalities (desktop virtual reality, immersive virtual reality, maps, and real-world navigation) might alter how egocentric and allocentric representations manifest. Specifically, we discuss desktop virtual reality vs. more immersive forms of navigation that better approximate real-world situations, and the extent to which less immersive encoding modalities alter neural and cognitive codes engaged during navigation more generally. We conclude that while encoding modality likely alters navigation-related codes to some degree, including egocentric and allocentric representations, it does not fundamentally change the underlying representations. Considering these arguments together, we suggest that tools to study human navigation in the lab, such as desktop virtual reality, provide overall a reasonable approximation of in vivo navigation, with some caveats.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00281/fullspatial representationsspatial informationnavigationegocentricallocentricvirtual reality |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Michael J. Starrett Michael J. Starrett Michael J. Starrett Arne D. Ekstrom Arne D. Ekstrom Arne D. Ekstrom Arne D. Ekstrom |
spellingShingle |
Michael J. Starrett Michael J. Starrett Michael J. Starrett Arne D. Ekstrom Arne D. Ekstrom Arne D. Ekstrom Arne D. Ekstrom Perspective: Assessing the Flexible Acquisition, Integration, and Deployment of Human Spatial Representations and Information Frontiers in Human Neuroscience spatial representations spatial information navigation egocentric allocentric virtual reality |
author_facet |
Michael J. Starrett Michael J. Starrett Michael J. Starrett Arne D. Ekstrom Arne D. Ekstrom Arne D. Ekstrom Arne D. Ekstrom |
author_sort |
Michael J. Starrett |
title |
Perspective: Assessing the Flexible Acquisition, Integration, and Deployment of Human Spatial Representations and Information |
title_short |
Perspective: Assessing the Flexible Acquisition, Integration, and Deployment of Human Spatial Representations and Information |
title_full |
Perspective: Assessing the Flexible Acquisition, Integration, and Deployment of Human Spatial Representations and Information |
title_fullStr |
Perspective: Assessing the Flexible Acquisition, Integration, and Deployment of Human Spatial Representations and Information |
title_full_unstemmed |
Perspective: Assessing the Flexible Acquisition, Integration, and Deployment of Human Spatial Representations and Information |
title_sort |
perspective: assessing the flexible acquisition, integration, and deployment of human spatial representations and information |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience |
issn |
1662-5161 |
publishDate |
2018-07-01 |
description |
Studying human spatial navigation in the lab can be challenging, particularly when including non-invasive neural measures like functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and scalp encephalography (EEG). While there is broad consensus that human spatial navigation involves both egocentric (self-referenced) and allocentric (world-referenced) coding schemes, exactly how these can be measured in ecologically meaningful situations remains controversial. Here, we explore these two forms of representation and how we might better measure them by reviewing commonly used spatial memory tasks and proposing a new task: the relative vector discrimination (RVD) task. Additionally, we explore how different encoding modalities (desktop virtual reality, immersive virtual reality, maps, and real-world navigation) might alter how egocentric and allocentric representations manifest. Specifically, we discuss desktop virtual reality vs. more immersive forms of navigation that better approximate real-world situations, and the extent to which less immersive encoding modalities alter neural and cognitive codes engaged during navigation more generally. We conclude that while encoding modality likely alters navigation-related codes to some degree, including egocentric and allocentric representations, it does not fundamentally change the underlying representations. Considering these arguments together, we suggest that tools to study human navigation in the lab, such as desktop virtual reality, provide overall a reasonable approximation of in vivo navigation, with some caveats. |
topic |
spatial representations spatial information navigation egocentric allocentric virtual reality |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00281/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT michaeljstarrett perspectiveassessingtheflexibleacquisitionintegrationanddeploymentofhumanspatialrepresentationsandinformation AT michaeljstarrett perspectiveassessingtheflexibleacquisitionintegrationanddeploymentofhumanspatialrepresentationsandinformation AT michaeljstarrett perspectiveassessingtheflexibleacquisitionintegrationanddeploymentofhumanspatialrepresentationsandinformation AT arnedekstrom perspectiveassessingtheflexibleacquisitionintegrationanddeploymentofhumanspatialrepresentationsandinformation AT arnedekstrom perspectiveassessingtheflexibleacquisitionintegrationanddeploymentofhumanspatialrepresentationsandinformation AT arnedekstrom perspectiveassessingtheflexibleacquisitionintegrationanddeploymentofhumanspatialrepresentationsandinformation AT arnedekstrom perspectiveassessingtheflexibleacquisitionintegrationanddeploymentofhumanspatialrepresentationsandinformation |
_version_ |
1724875346360139776 |