Conversational flow promotes solidarity.

Social interaction is fundamental to the development of various aspects of "we-ness". Previous research has focused on the role the content of interaction plays in establishing feelings of unity, belongingness and shared reality (a cluster of variables referred to as solidarity here). The...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Namkje Koudenburg, Tom Postmes, Ernestine H Gordijn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3827030?pdf=render
id doaj-5243351243684f97850c593be03de776
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5243351243684f97850c593be03de7762020-11-25T01:18:14ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-01811e7836310.1371/journal.pone.0078363Conversational flow promotes solidarity.Namkje KoudenburgTom PostmesErnestine H GordijnSocial interaction is fundamental to the development of various aspects of "we-ness". Previous research has focused on the role the content of interaction plays in establishing feelings of unity, belongingness and shared reality (a cluster of variables referred to as solidarity here). The present paper is less concerned with content, but focuses on the form of social interaction. We propose that the degree to which conversations flow smoothly or not is, of itself, a cue to solidarity. We test this hypothesis in samples of unacquainted and acquainted dyads who communicate via headsets. Conversational flow is disrupted by introducing a delay in the auditory feedback (vs. no delay). Results of three studies show that smoothly coordinated conversations (compared with disrupted conversations and a control condition) increase feelings of belonging and perceptions of group entitativity, independently of conversation content. These effects are driven by the subjective experience of conversational flow. Our data suggest that this process occurs largely beyond individuals' control. We conclude that the form of social interaction is a powerful cue for inferring group solidarity. Implications for the impact of modern communication technology on developing a shared social identity are discussed.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3827030?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Namkje Koudenburg
Tom Postmes
Ernestine H Gordijn
spellingShingle Namkje Koudenburg
Tom Postmes
Ernestine H Gordijn
Conversational flow promotes solidarity.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Namkje Koudenburg
Tom Postmes
Ernestine H Gordijn
author_sort Namkje Koudenburg
title Conversational flow promotes solidarity.
title_short Conversational flow promotes solidarity.
title_full Conversational flow promotes solidarity.
title_fullStr Conversational flow promotes solidarity.
title_full_unstemmed Conversational flow promotes solidarity.
title_sort conversational flow promotes solidarity.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Social interaction is fundamental to the development of various aspects of "we-ness". Previous research has focused on the role the content of interaction plays in establishing feelings of unity, belongingness and shared reality (a cluster of variables referred to as solidarity here). The present paper is less concerned with content, but focuses on the form of social interaction. We propose that the degree to which conversations flow smoothly or not is, of itself, a cue to solidarity. We test this hypothesis in samples of unacquainted and acquainted dyads who communicate via headsets. Conversational flow is disrupted by introducing a delay in the auditory feedback (vs. no delay). Results of three studies show that smoothly coordinated conversations (compared with disrupted conversations and a control condition) increase feelings of belonging and perceptions of group entitativity, independently of conversation content. These effects are driven by the subjective experience of conversational flow. Our data suggest that this process occurs largely beyond individuals' control. We conclude that the form of social interaction is a powerful cue for inferring group solidarity. Implications for the impact of modern communication technology on developing a shared social identity are discussed.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3827030?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT namkjekoudenburg conversationalflowpromotessolidarity
AT tompostmes conversationalflowpromotessolidarity
AT ernestinehgordijn conversationalflowpromotessolidarity
_version_ 1725142864925556736