A theory and methodology to quantify knowledge
This article proposes quantitative answers to meta-scientific questions including ‘how much knowledge is attained by a research field?’, ‘how rapidly is a field making progress?’, ‘what is the expected reproducibility of a result?’, ‘how much knowledge is lost from scientific bias and misconduct?’,...
Main Author: | Daniele Fanelli |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
The Royal Society
2019-04-01
|
Series: | Royal Society Open Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.181055 |
Similar Items
-
Reliability Generalization: a Systematic Review and Evaluation of Meta-analytic Methodology and Reporting Practice
by: Holland, David F.
Published: (2015) -
An empirical assessment of transparency and reproducibility-related research practices in the social sciences (2014–2017)
by: Tom E. Hardwicke, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01) -
The influence of the team in conducting a systematic review
by: Lesley Uttley, et al.
Published: (2017-08-01) -
The Weak Spots in Contemporary Science (and How to Fix Them)
by: Jelte M. Wicherts
Published: (2017-11-01) -
COVID-19 research risks ignoring important host genes due to pre-established research patterns
by: Thomas Stoeger, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01)