Association of Infrastructure and Route Environment Factors with Cycling Injury Risk at Intersection and Non-Intersection Locations: A Case-Crossover Study of Britain

Objective: This paper examines infrastructural and route environment correlates of cycling injury risk in Britain for commuters riding in the morning peak. Methods: The study uses a case-crossover design which controls for exposure. Control sites from modelled cyclist routes (matched on intersection...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rachel Aldred, Georgios Kapousizis, Anna Goodman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-03-01
Series:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/6/3060
id doaj-5239b53970df4fcc8c7cb023690f3c99
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5239b53970df4fcc8c7cb023690f3c992021-03-17T00:04:45ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1661-78271660-46012021-03-01183060306010.3390/ijerph18063060Association of Infrastructure and Route Environment Factors with Cycling Injury Risk at Intersection and Non-Intersection Locations: A Case-Crossover Study of BritainRachel Aldred0Georgios Kapousizis1Anna Goodman2School of Architecture and Cities, Westminster University, London NW1 5LS, UKFaculty of Engineering Technology, University of Twente, 7500 AE Enschede, The NetherlandsFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, LSHTM, London WC1E 7HT, UKObjective: This paper examines infrastructural and route environment correlates of cycling injury risk in Britain for commuters riding in the morning peak. Methods: The study uses a case-crossover design which controls for exposure. Control sites from modelled cyclist routes (matched on intersection status) were compared with sites where cyclists were injured. Conditional logistic regression for matched case–control groups was used to compare characteristics of control and injury sites. Results: High streets (defined by clustering of retail premises) raised injury odds by 32%. Main (Class A or primary) roads were riskier than other road types, with injury odds twice that for residential roads. Wider roads, and those with lower gradients increased injury odds. Guard railing raised injury odds by 18%, and petrol stations or car parks by 43%. Bus lanes raised injury odds by 84%. As in other studies, there was a ‘safety in numbers’ effect from more cyclists. Contrary to other analysis, including two recent studies in London, we did not find a protective effect from cycle infrastructure and the presence of painted cycle lanes raised injury odds by 54%. At intersections, both standard and mini roundabouts were associated with injury odds several times higher than other intersections. Presence of traffic signals, with or without an Advanced Stop Line (‘bike box’), had no impact on injury odds. For a cyclist on a main road, intersections with minor roads were riskier than intersections with other main roads. Conclusions: Typical cycling environments in Britain put cyclists at risk, and infrastructure must be improved, particularly on busy main roads, high streets, and bus routes.https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/6/3060cyclinginjuryroute environmentcase-crossoverinfrastructureintersections
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rachel Aldred
Georgios Kapousizis
Anna Goodman
spellingShingle Rachel Aldred
Georgios Kapousizis
Anna Goodman
Association of Infrastructure and Route Environment Factors with Cycling Injury Risk at Intersection and Non-Intersection Locations: A Case-Crossover Study of Britain
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
cycling
injury
route environment
case-crossover
infrastructure
intersections
author_facet Rachel Aldred
Georgios Kapousizis
Anna Goodman
author_sort Rachel Aldred
title Association of Infrastructure and Route Environment Factors with Cycling Injury Risk at Intersection and Non-Intersection Locations: A Case-Crossover Study of Britain
title_short Association of Infrastructure and Route Environment Factors with Cycling Injury Risk at Intersection and Non-Intersection Locations: A Case-Crossover Study of Britain
title_full Association of Infrastructure and Route Environment Factors with Cycling Injury Risk at Intersection and Non-Intersection Locations: A Case-Crossover Study of Britain
title_fullStr Association of Infrastructure and Route Environment Factors with Cycling Injury Risk at Intersection and Non-Intersection Locations: A Case-Crossover Study of Britain
title_full_unstemmed Association of Infrastructure and Route Environment Factors with Cycling Injury Risk at Intersection and Non-Intersection Locations: A Case-Crossover Study of Britain
title_sort association of infrastructure and route environment factors with cycling injury risk at intersection and non-intersection locations: a case-crossover study of britain
publisher MDPI AG
series International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
issn 1661-7827
1660-4601
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Objective: This paper examines infrastructural and route environment correlates of cycling injury risk in Britain for commuters riding in the morning peak. Methods: The study uses a case-crossover design which controls for exposure. Control sites from modelled cyclist routes (matched on intersection status) were compared with sites where cyclists were injured. Conditional logistic regression for matched case–control groups was used to compare characteristics of control and injury sites. Results: High streets (defined by clustering of retail premises) raised injury odds by 32%. Main (Class A or primary) roads were riskier than other road types, with injury odds twice that for residential roads. Wider roads, and those with lower gradients increased injury odds. Guard railing raised injury odds by 18%, and petrol stations or car parks by 43%. Bus lanes raised injury odds by 84%. As in other studies, there was a ‘safety in numbers’ effect from more cyclists. Contrary to other analysis, including two recent studies in London, we did not find a protective effect from cycle infrastructure and the presence of painted cycle lanes raised injury odds by 54%. At intersections, both standard and mini roundabouts were associated with injury odds several times higher than other intersections. Presence of traffic signals, with or without an Advanced Stop Line (‘bike box’), had no impact on injury odds. For a cyclist on a main road, intersections with minor roads were riskier than intersections with other main roads. Conclusions: Typical cycling environments in Britain put cyclists at risk, and infrastructure must be improved, particularly on busy main roads, high streets, and bus routes.
topic cycling
injury
route environment
case-crossover
infrastructure
intersections
url https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/6/3060
work_keys_str_mv AT rachelaldred associationofinfrastructureandrouteenvironmentfactorswithcyclinginjuryriskatintersectionandnonintersectionlocationsacasecrossoverstudyofbritain
AT georgioskapousizis associationofinfrastructureandrouteenvironmentfactorswithcyclinginjuryriskatintersectionandnonintersectionlocationsacasecrossoverstudyofbritain
AT annagoodman associationofinfrastructureandrouteenvironmentfactorswithcyclinginjuryriskatintersectionandnonintersectionlocationsacasecrossoverstudyofbritain
_version_ 1724218986785144832