Assessing Climate Finance Readiness in the Asia-Pacific Region

Readiness is the current mantra in the climate finance discourse and is a key determinant for accessing climate finance. This study develops and applies an analytical 3-dimensional framework to appraise climate finance readiness in selected Asia-Pacific countries. Three dimensions of readiness are i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jale Samuwai, Jeremy Maxwell Hills
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-04-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/4/1192
id doaj-5234016a7e1e4cd19046e6a60a6354f5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5234016a7e1e4cd19046e6a60a6354f52020-11-24T22:17:05ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502018-04-01104119210.3390/su10041192su10041192Assessing Climate Finance Readiness in the Asia-Pacific RegionJale Samuwai0Jeremy Maxwell Hills1Pacific Center for Environment & Sustainable Development, The University of the South Pacific, Laucala Campus, Private Mail Bag, Suva, FijiInstitute of Marine Resources, The University of the South Pacific, Laucala Campus, Private Mail Bag, Suva, FijiReadiness is the current mantra in the climate finance discourse and is a key determinant for accessing climate finance. This study develops and applies an analytical 3-dimensional framework to appraise climate finance readiness in selected Asia-Pacific countries. Three dimensions of readiness are identified: (1) Policies and Institutions, (2) Knowledge Management and Learning, and (3) Fiscal Policy Environment. Using the Climate Public Expenditure and Institutional Review as the basis for such framework, the study uncovers a massive readiness gap between countries in the Asian sub-region and those in the Pacific sub-region. The study also found that readiness has a predictable, yet small, impact on the magnitude of climate finance accessed. This suggests that improving readiness alone is not sufficient to unlock climate finance, as access to climate finance is to a larger extent determined by other factors; this is critical to shaping readiness endeavors for the Pacific Small Island Developing States (PSIDS), as well as for donors. This study argues for a re-think in the PSIDS current readiness approach, reducing emphasis on multilateral and private flows and diversifying through practical and uncomplicated bilateral and remittance sources. These two sources of finances have a good track record of consistently mobilizing external finance to PSIDS despite their climate finance readiness status. Broadening readiness efforts towards these two alternative funding sources extends the feasibility of the current readiness approach. The present direction of climate finance readiness offers a continuing access dilemma to many of the PSIDS, especially the poorest and most vulnerable.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/4/1192climate financereadinessAsia-PacificSmall Island StatesbilateralremittancesCPEIRPSIDSclimate change
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jale Samuwai
Jeremy Maxwell Hills
spellingShingle Jale Samuwai
Jeremy Maxwell Hills
Assessing Climate Finance Readiness in the Asia-Pacific Region
Sustainability
climate finance
readiness
Asia-Pacific
Small Island States
bilateral
remittances
CPEIR
PSIDS
climate change
author_facet Jale Samuwai
Jeremy Maxwell Hills
author_sort Jale Samuwai
title Assessing Climate Finance Readiness in the Asia-Pacific Region
title_short Assessing Climate Finance Readiness in the Asia-Pacific Region
title_full Assessing Climate Finance Readiness in the Asia-Pacific Region
title_fullStr Assessing Climate Finance Readiness in the Asia-Pacific Region
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Climate Finance Readiness in the Asia-Pacific Region
title_sort assessing climate finance readiness in the asia-pacific region
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2018-04-01
description Readiness is the current mantra in the climate finance discourse and is a key determinant for accessing climate finance. This study develops and applies an analytical 3-dimensional framework to appraise climate finance readiness in selected Asia-Pacific countries. Three dimensions of readiness are identified: (1) Policies and Institutions, (2) Knowledge Management and Learning, and (3) Fiscal Policy Environment. Using the Climate Public Expenditure and Institutional Review as the basis for such framework, the study uncovers a massive readiness gap between countries in the Asian sub-region and those in the Pacific sub-region. The study also found that readiness has a predictable, yet small, impact on the magnitude of climate finance accessed. This suggests that improving readiness alone is not sufficient to unlock climate finance, as access to climate finance is to a larger extent determined by other factors; this is critical to shaping readiness endeavors for the Pacific Small Island Developing States (PSIDS), as well as for donors. This study argues for a re-think in the PSIDS current readiness approach, reducing emphasis on multilateral and private flows and diversifying through practical and uncomplicated bilateral and remittance sources. These two sources of finances have a good track record of consistently mobilizing external finance to PSIDS despite their climate finance readiness status. Broadening readiness efforts towards these two alternative funding sources extends the feasibility of the current readiness approach. The present direction of climate finance readiness offers a continuing access dilemma to many of the PSIDS, especially the poorest and most vulnerable.
topic climate finance
readiness
Asia-Pacific
Small Island States
bilateral
remittances
CPEIR
PSIDS
climate change
url http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/4/1192
work_keys_str_mv AT jalesamuwai assessingclimatefinancereadinessintheasiapacificregion
AT jeremymaxwellhills assessingclimatefinancereadinessintheasiapacificregion
_version_ 1725786610002296832