Immediate Uptake of Phonological Corrective Feedback in Language Learning and Retention

As language learners’ phonological errors have attracted substantial attention, error treatment strategies have become an indispensable part of teachers’ repertoire. Research has found positive effects for corrective feedback on language learner uptake; however, the effect has not been proved to be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amin Naeimi, Mahnaz Saeidi, Biook Behnam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2018-01-01
Series:Education Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/2579421
id doaj-5231540af4ad4eb1834c93d965f5809f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5231540af4ad4eb1834c93d965f5809f2020-11-24T23:24:27ZengHindawi LimitedEducation Research International2090-40022090-40102018-01-01201810.1155/2018/25794212579421Immediate Uptake of Phonological Corrective Feedback in Language Learning and RetentionAmin Naeimi0Mahnaz Saeidi1Biook Behnam2Department of English, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, IranDepartment of English, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, IranDepartment of English, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, IranAs language learners’ phonological errors have attracted substantial attention, error treatment strategies have become an indispensable part of teachers’ repertoire. Research has found positive effects for corrective feedback on language learner uptake; however, the effect has not been proved to be sustained over time. This quasiexperimental study sought to explore whether uptake can reflect language learning and retention through measuring the effectiveness of three common types of oral corrective feedback on Iranian EFL learners’ phonological errors. Fifty-four male intermediate-level learners received a nine-session treatment in the form of recast, elicitation, and metalinguistic feedback during story retelling tasks. Results of comparing and correlating uptake with posttest scores revealed that while recast was found to be the most effective feedback in inducing correct uptake, it was metalinguistic feedback that proved to be the most conducive in learning and retention. Besides, there was no significant relationship between the learners’ scores in uptake and their learning and retention in any groups. This suggests that EFL learners’ immediate reactions to teachers’ input-providing or output-prompting correction could not be a reflection of language development, and more consistent and continuous long-term assessment of the success of corrective feedback has to be envisaged in language teaching methodologies.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/2579421
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Amin Naeimi
Mahnaz Saeidi
Biook Behnam
spellingShingle Amin Naeimi
Mahnaz Saeidi
Biook Behnam
Immediate Uptake of Phonological Corrective Feedback in Language Learning and Retention
Education Research International
author_facet Amin Naeimi
Mahnaz Saeidi
Biook Behnam
author_sort Amin Naeimi
title Immediate Uptake of Phonological Corrective Feedback in Language Learning and Retention
title_short Immediate Uptake of Phonological Corrective Feedback in Language Learning and Retention
title_full Immediate Uptake of Phonological Corrective Feedback in Language Learning and Retention
title_fullStr Immediate Uptake of Phonological Corrective Feedback in Language Learning and Retention
title_full_unstemmed Immediate Uptake of Phonological Corrective Feedback in Language Learning and Retention
title_sort immediate uptake of phonological corrective feedback in language learning and retention
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Education Research International
issn 2090-4002
2090-4010
publishDate 2018-01-01
description As language learners’ phonological errors have attracted substantial attention, error treatment strategies have become an indispensable part of teachers’ repertoire. Research has found positive effects for corrective feedback on language learner uptake; however, the effect has not been proved to be sustained over time. This quasiexperimental study sought to explore whether uptake can reflect language learning and retention through measuring the effectiveness of three common types of oral corrective feedback on Iranian EFL learners’ phonological errors. Fifty-four male intermediate-level learners received a nine-session treatment in the form of recast, elicitation, and metalinguistic feedback during story retelling tasks. Results of comparing and correlating uptake with posttest scores revealed that while recast was found to be the most effective feedback in inducing correct uptake, it was metalinguistic feedback that proved to be the most conducive in learning and retention. Besides, there was no significant relationship between the learners’ scores in uptake and their learning and retention in any groups. This suggests that EFL learners’ immediate reactions to teachers’ input-providing or output-prompting correction could not be a reflection of language development, and more consistent and continuous long-term assessment of the success of corrective feedback has to be envisaged in language teaching methodologies.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/2579421
work_keys_str_mv AT aminnaeimi immediateuptakeofphonologicalcorrectivefeedbackinlanguagelearningandretention
AT mahnazsaeidi immediateuptakeofphonologicalcorrectivefeedbackinlanguagelearningandretention
AT biookbehnam immediateuptakeofphonologicalcorrectivefeedbackinlanguagelearningandretention
_version_ 1725560526813003776