Public transfers and living alone among the elderly: A case study of Korea's new income support program

<b>Background</b>: Despite the significant implications of older adults' living arrangements for their well-being, it is not clear whether public transfers for the elderly will increase or decrease their independent living. A few natural experiments in the U.S. show that such suppor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Erin Hye-Won Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research 2015-06-01
Series:Demographic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol32/50/
id doaj-521d9ccf0c3a4f7bafb1381c1d4a25d9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-521d9ccf0c3a4f7bafb1381c1d4a25d92020-11-25T00:34:44ZengMax Planck Institute for Demographic ResearchDemographic Research1435-98712015-06-01325010.4054/DemRes.2015.32.502600Public transfers and living alone among the elderly: A case study of Korea's new income support programErin Hye-Won Kim0National University of Singapore<b>Background</b>: Despite the significant implications of older adults' living arrangements for their well-being, it is not clear whether public transfers for the elderly will increase or decrease their independent living. A few natural experiments in the U.S. show that such support increases elders' living alone owing to their preferences for privacy. There has been little quasi-experimental evidence in Asia, where multigenerational coresidence is prevalent and norms and preferences for that form of living arrangement remain strong. <b>Objective</b>: In 2008 the Korean government introduced the Basic Old-Age Pension (BOAP), a means-tested income support program for elders. This article examines how the program affects unmarried Korean elders' likelihood of living alone. <b>Methods</b>: I analyze the 2005, 2007, 2009, and 2011 waves of the Korean Retirement and Income Study, a longitudinal survey of nationally representative Koreans. The analysis takes a difference-in-difference approach, which compares changes in the living arrangements of two elderly groups, one that received BOAP benefits and the other that did not. <b>Results</b>: Overall, the program has a negative, not positive, impact on elders' living alone. A closer look reveals that the transfers helped non-coresident elders to continue living alone and prevented coresident elders from forming one-person households. <b>Conclusions</b>: Ambivalent attitudes towards living alone in the transitional Korean society, together with the modest amount of BOAP benefits, appear to explain the mixed results. These findings are particularly relevant to other rapidly changing societies where public elder-support systems are expanding and norms of familial elder support are weakening.http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol32/50/Korealiving aloneold-age pensionsolder adultspublic transfers
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Erin Hye-Won Kim
spellingShingle Erin Hye-Won Kim
Public transfers and living alone among the elderly: A case study of Korea's new income support program
Demographic Research
Korea
living alone
old-age pensions
older adults
public transfers
author_facet Erin Hye-Won Kim
author_sort Erin Hye-Won Kim
title Public transfers and living alone among the elderly: A case study of Korea's new income support program
title_short Public transfers and living alone among the elderly: A case study of Korea's new income support program
title_full Public transfers and living alone among the elderly: A case study of Korea's new income support program
title_fullStr Public transfers and living alone among the elderly: A case study of Korea's new income support program
title_full_unstemmed Public transfers and living alone among the elderly: A case study of Korea's new income support program
title_sort public transfers and living alone among the elderly: a case study of korea's new income support program
publisher Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research
series Demographic Research
issn 1435-9871
publishDate 2015-06-01
description <b>Background</b>: Despite the significant implications of older adults' living arrangements for their well-being, it is not clear whether public transfers for the elderly will increase or decrease their independent living. A few natural experiments in the U.S. show that such support increases elders' living alone owing to their preferences for privacy. There has been little quasi-experimental evidence in Asia, where multigenerational coresidence is prevalent and norms and preferences for that form of living arrangement remain strong. <b>Objective</b>: In 2008 the Korean government introduced the Basic Old-Age Pension (BOAP), a means-tested income support program for elders. This article examines how the program affects unmarried Korean elders' likelihood of living alone. <b>Methods</b>: I analyze the 2005, 2007, 2009, and 2011 waves of the Korean Retirement and Income Study, a longitudinal survey of nationally representative Koreans. The analysis takes a difference-in-difference approach, which compares changes in the living arrangements of two elderly groups, one that received BOAP benefits and the other that did not. <b>Results</b>: Overall, the program has a negative, not positive, impact on elders' living alone. A closer look reveals that the transfers helped non-coresident elders to continue living alone and prevented coresident elders from forming one-person households. <b>Conclusions</b>: Ambivalent attitudes towards living alone in the transitional Korean society, together with the modest amount of BOAP benefits, appear to explain the mixed results. These findings are particularly relevant to other rapidly changing societies where public elder-support systems are expanding and norms of familial elder support are weakening.
topic Korea
living alone
old-age pensions
older adults
public transfers
url http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol32/50/
work_keys_str_mv AT erinhyewonkim publictransfersandlivingaloneamongtheelderlyacasestudyofkoreasnewincomesupportprogram
_version_ 1725311855322202112