Survey of Equine Referring Veterinarians' Satisfaction with Their Most Recent Equine Referral Experience

Background Little is known about the veterinary referral process and factors that contribute to positive outcomes. Objective To investigate equine referring veterinarians' (rDVMs') satisfaction with their most recent referral experience and compare rDVM and specialist perspectives. Sample...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C. Best, J.B. Coe, J. Hewson, M. Meehan, D. Kelton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-03-01
Series:Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15053
id doaj-521cb37e5f1e40b18385938bc2f55979
record_format Article
spelling doaj-521cb37e5f1e40b18385938bc2f559792020-11-24T22:04:14ZengWileyJournal of Veterinary Internal Medicine0891-66401939-16762018-03-0132282283110.1111/jvim.15053Survey of Equine Referring Veterinarians' Satisfaction with Their Most Recent Equine Referral ExperienceC. Best0J.B. Coe1J. Hewson2M. Meehan3D. Kelton4Departments of Population Medicine (Best, Coe, Meehan, Kelton), and Clinical Studies (Hewson)Ontario Veterinary College, University of GuelphGuelph ON CanadaDepartments of Population Medicine (Best, Coe, Meehan, Kelton), and Clinical Studies (Hewson)Ontario Veterinary College, University of GuelphGuelph ON CanadaDepartments of Population Medicine (Best, Coe, Meehan, Kelton), and Clinical Studies (Hewson)Ontario Veterinary College, University of GuelphGuelph ON CanadaDepartments of Population Medicine (Best, Coe, Meehan, Kelton), and Clinical Studies (Hewson)Ontario Veterinary College, University of GuelphGuelph ON CanadaDepartments of Population Medicine (Best, Coe, Meehan, Kelton), and Clinical Studies (Hewson)Ontario Veterinary College, University of GuelphGuelph ON CanadaBackground Little is known about the veterinary referral process and factors that contribute to positive outcomes. Objective To investigate equine referring veterinarians' (rDVMs') satisfaction with their most recent referral experience and compare rDVM and specialist perspectives. Sample 187 rDVMs and 92 specialists (referral care providers). Methods Cross‐sectional observational study. An online survey was administered to both rDVMs and specialists. Referring veterinarian satisfaction with their most recent referral experience was evaluated. Both rDVMs and specialists were asked to identify factors influencing a rDVM's decision where to refer, and the top 3 factors they perceive are barriers to referral care. Results Median rDVM satisfaction with their most recent referral care experience was 80 of 100 (mean, 75; range, 8–100). Referring veterinarians provided the lowest satisfaction score for the item asking about “The competition the referral hospital poses to your practice” (mean, 56.96; median, 62; range, 0–100). The top factor rDVMs identified as influencing their decision where to refer was “quality of care,” whereas specialists identified “quality of communication and updates from the clinician.” Referring veterinarians' top barrier to referral care was “high cost of referral care,” and for specialists was “poor service provided to the client by the referral hospital.” Conclusions and Clinical Importance Referring veterinarians generally were satisfied with referral care, but areas exist where rDVMs and specialists differ in what they view as important to the referral process. Exploring opportunities to overcome these differences is likely to support high quality care.https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15053Equine referral careInter‐professional relationshipsReferral hospitalReferring veterinarian satisfactionSpecialty care
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author C. Best
J.B. Coe
J. Hewson
M. Meehan
D. Kelton
spellingShingle C. Best
J.B. Coe
J. Hewson
M. Meehan
D. Kelton
Survey of Equine Referring Veterinarians' Satisfaction with Their Most Recent Equine Referral Experience
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
Equine referral care
Inter‐professional relationships
Referral hospital
Referring veterinarian satisfaction
Specialty care
author_facet C. Best
J.B. Coe
J. Hewson
M. Meehan
D. Kelton
author_sort C. Best
title Survey of Equine Referring Veterinarians' Satisfaction with Their Most Recent Equine Referral Experience
title_short Survey of Equine Referring Veterinarians' Satisfaction with Their Most Recent Equine Referral Experience
title_full Survey of Equine Referring Veterinarians' Satisfaction with Their Most Recent Equine Referral Experience
title_fullStr Survey of Equine Referring Veterinarians' Satisfaction with Their Most Recent Equine Referral Experience
title_full_unstemmed Survey of Equine Referring Veterinarians' Satisfaction with Their Most Recent Equine Referral Experience
title_sort survey of equine referring veterinarians' satisfaction with their most recent equine referral experience
publisher Wiley
series Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
issn 0891-6640
1939-1676
publishDate 2018-03-01
description Background Little is known about the veterinary referral process and factors that contribute to positive outcomes. Objective To investigate equine referring veterinarians' (rDVMs') satisfaction with their most recent referral experience and compare rDVM and specialist perspectives. Sample 187 rDVMs and 92 specialists (referral care providers). Methods Cross‐sectional observational study. An online survey was administered to both rDVMs and specialists. Referring veterinarian satisfaction with their most recent referral experience was evaluated. Both rDVMs and specialists were asked to identify factors influencing a rDVM's decision where to refer, and the top 3 factors they perceive are barriers to referral care. Results Median rDVM satisfaction with their most recent referral care experience was 80 of 100 (mean, 75; range, 8–100). Referring veterinarians provided the lowest satisfaction score for the item asking about “The competition the referral hospital poses to your practice” (mean, 56.96; median, 62; range, 0–100). The top factor rDVMs identified as influencing their decision where to refer was “quality of care,” whereas specialists identified “quality of communication and updates from the clinician.” Referring veterinarians' top barrier to referral care was “high cost of referral care,” and for specialists was “poor service provided to the client by the referral hospital.” Conclusions and Clinical Importance Referring veterinarians generally were satisfied with referral care, but areas exist where rDVMs and specialists differ in what they view as important to the referral process. Exploring opportunities to overcome these differences is likely to support high quality care.
topic Equine referral care
Inter‐professional relationships
Referral hospital
Referring veterinarian satisfaction
Specialty care
url https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15053
work_keys_str_mv AT cbest surveyofequinereferringveterinarianssatisfactionwiththeirmostrecentequinereferralexperience
AT jbcoe surveyofequinereferringveterinarianssatisfactionwiththeirmostrecentequinereferralexperience
AT jhewson surveyofequinereferringveterinarianssatisfactionwiththeirmostrecentequinereferralexperience
AT mmeehan surveyofequinereferringveterinarianssatisfactionwiththeirmostrecentequinereferralexperience
AT dkelton surveyofequinereferringveterinarianssatisfactionwiththeirmostrecentequinereferralexperience
_version_ 1725829741592707072