LITERATURE CONCEPT: THEORIES AND CONTROVERSIES
The article addresses the problem of defining literature, insisting on several theories launched over time. Plato and Aristotle’s conceptions of art/literature serve as a starting point in approaching the problem. Further, a series of concepts are analyzed: literature – language/word art (Croce, G....
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Notograf Prim
2020-09-01
|
Series: | Studiul Artelor şi Culturologie: Istorie, Teorie, Practică |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://revista.amtap.md/wp-content/files_mf/159826981820.schiopu.conceptul.pdf |
id |
doaj-5208b087f613447db078d9314e56ff75 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5208b087f613447db078d9314e56ff752020-11-25T03:05:55ZdeuNotograf PrimStudiul Artelor şi Culturologie: Istorie, Teorie, Practică2345-14082345-18312020-09-011(36)101106LITERATURE CONCEPT: THEORIES AND CONTROVERSIESŞCHIOPU CONSTANTIN0Academy of Music, Theatre and Fine Arts The article addresses the problem of defining literature, insisting on several theories launched over time. Plato and Aristotle’s conceptions of art/literature serve as a starting point in approaching the problem. Further, a series of concepts are analyzed: literature – language/word art (Croce, G. Morpurgo-Tagliabue, Moscow linguistic circle, Society for the study of poetic language in Petrograd), the structural identity of different layers of the work (Linguistic Circle from Prague: J. Mukarovsky, B. Havranek, F. Vodicka), the literary work as a stratified product (Roman Ingarden). It is concluded that all theories are important, as they eliminate at least a part of the controversies regarding the only fair ideological interpretation of literary works.http://revista.amtap.md/wp-content/files_mf/159826981820.schiopu.conceptul.pdfliterature theoriescontroversieslanguageliterary work |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
ŞCHIOPU CONSTANTIN |
spellingShingle |
ŞCHIOPU CONSTANTIN LITERATURE CONCEPT: THEORIES AND CONTROVERSIES Studiul Artelor şi Culturologie: Istorie, Teorie, Practică literature theories controversies language literary work |
author_facet |
ŞCHIOPU CONSTANTIN |
author_sort |
ŞCHIOPU CONSTANTIN |
title |
LITERATURE CONCEPT: THEORIES AND CONTROVERSIES |
title_short |
LITERATURE CONCEPT: THEORIES AND CONTROVERSIES |
title_full |
LITERATURE CONCEPT: THEORIES AND CONTROVERSIES |
title_fullStr |
LITERATURE CONCEPT: THEORIES AND CONTROVERSIES |
title_full_unstemmed |
LITERATURE CONCEPT: THEORIES AND CONTROVERSIES |
title_sort |
literature concept: theories and controversies |
publisher |
Notograf Prim |
series |
Studiul Artelor şi Culturologie: Istorie, Teorie, Practică |
issn |
2345-1408 2345-1831 |
publishDate |
2020-09-01 |
description |
The article addresses the problem of defining literature, insisting on several theories launched over time. Plato and Aristotle’s conceptions of art/literature serve as a starting point in approaching the problem. Further, a series of concepts are analyzed: literature – language/word art (Croce, G. Morpurgo-Tagliabue, Moscow linguistic circle, Society for the study of poetic language in Petrograd), the structural identity of different layers of the work (Linguistic Circle from Prague: J. Mukarovsky, B. Havranek, F. Vodicka), the literary work as a stratified product (Roman Ingarden). It is concluded that all theories are important, as they eliminate at least a part of the controversies regarding the only fair ideological interpretation of literary works. |
topic |
literature theories controversies language literary work |
url |
http://revista.amtap.md/wp-content/files_mf/159826981820.schiopu.conceptul.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT schiopuconstantin literatureconcepttheoriesandcontroversies |
_version_ |
1724676528444276736 |