Biomarkers in Inflammatory Myopathies—An Expanded Definition

Biomarkers as parameters of pathophysiological conditions can be of outmost relevance for inflammatory myopathies. They are particularly warranted to inform about diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic questions. As biomarkers become more and more relevant in daily routine, this review focusses on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olivier Benveniste, Hans-Hilmar Goebel, Werner Stenzel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Neurology
Subjects:
IIM
DM
IBM
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fneur.2019.00554/full
id doaj-5207fe83595a477bbd4a8745d09bc9d8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5207fe83595a477bbd4a8745d09bc9d82020-11-25T01:59:19ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952019-06-011010.3389/fneur.2019.00554443761Biomarkers in Inflammatory Myopathies—An Expanded DefinitionOlivier Benveniste0Hans-Hilmar Goebel1Hans-Hilmar Goebel2Werner Stenzel3Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Assistance Public-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne-Université, INSERM, UMR974, Paris, FranceDepartment of Neuropathology, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Charité - Universitätsmedizin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Neuropathology, Mainz - Universitätsmedizin, Johannes Gutenberg- University, Mainz, GermanyDepartment of Neuropathology, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Charité - Universitätsmedizin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, GermanyBiomarkers as parameters of pathophysiological conditions can be of outmost relevance for inflammatory myopathies. They are particularly warranted to inform about diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic questions. As biomarkers become more and more relevant in daily routine, this review focusses on relevant aspects particularly addressing myopathological features. However, the level of evidence to use them in daily routine at presence is low, still since none of them has been validated in large cohorts of patients and rarely in independent biopsy series. Hence, they should be read as mere expert opinions. The evaluation of biomarkers as well as key biological parameters is an ongoing process, and we start learning about relevance of them, as we must recognize that pathophysiology of myositis is biologically incompletely understood. As such this approach should be considered an essay toward expansion of the definition “biomarker” to myositis, an emerging field of interest in biomedical research.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fneur.2019.00554/fullIIMmyositis-specific-autoantibodiesDMIMNMIBMmyositis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Olivier Benveniste
Hans-Hilmar Goebel
Hans-Hilmar Goebel
Werner Stenzel
spellingShingle Olivier Benveniste
Hans-Hilmar Goebel
Hans-Hilmar Goebel
Werner Stenzel
Biomarkers in Inflammatory Myopathies—An Expanded Definition
Frontiers in Neurology
IIM
myositis-specific-autoantibodies
DM
IMNM
IBM
myositis
author_facet Olivier Benveniste
Hans-Hilmar Goebel
Hans-Hilmar Goebel
Werner Stenzel
author_sort Olivier Benveniste
title Biomarkers in Inflammatory Myopathies—An Expanded Definition
title_short Biomarkers in Inflammatory Myopathies—An Expanded Definition
title_full Biomarkers in Inflammatory Myopathies—An Expanded Definition
title_fullStr Biomarkers in Inflammatory Myopathies—An Expanded Definition
title_full_unstemmed Biomarkers in Inflammatory Myopathies—An Expanded Definition
title_sort biomarkers in inflammatory myopathies—an expanded definition
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Neurology
issn 1664-2295
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Biomarkers as parameters of pathophysiological conditions can be of outmost relevance for inflammatory myopathies. They are particularly warranted to inform about diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic questions. As biomarkers become more and more relevant in daily routine, this review focusses on relevant aspects particularly addressing myopathological features. However, the level of evidence to use them in daily routine at presence is low, still since none of them has been validated in large cohorts of patients and rarely in independent biopsy series. Hence, they should be read as mere expert opinions. The evaluation of biomarkers as well as key biological parameters is an ongoing process, and we start learning about relevance of them, as we must recognize that pathophysiology of myositis is biologically incompletely understood. As such this approach should be considered an essay toward expansion of the definition “biomarker” to myositis, an emerging field of interest in biomedical research.
topic IIM
myositis-specific-autoantibodies
DM
IMNM
IBM
myositis
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fneur.2019.00554/full
work_keys_str_mv AT olivierbenveniste biomarkersininflammatorymyopathiesanexpandeddefinition
AT hanshilmargoebel biomarkersininflammatorymyopathiesanexpandeddefinition
AT hanshilmargoebel biomarkersininflammatorymyopathiesanexpandeddefinition
AT wernerstenzel biomarkersininflammatorymyopathiesanexpandeddefinition
_version_ 1724965233138597888