Gene selection with multiple ordering criteria

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>A microarray study may select different differentially expressed gene sets because of different selection criteria. For example, the fold-change and p-value are two commonly known criteria to select differentially expressed genes und...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tzeng ShengLi, Tsai Chen-An, Chen James J, Chen Chun-Houh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2007-03-01
Series:BMC Bioinformatics
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/8/74
id doaj-51fe9aab69f841a4802ff51c90a6e017
record_format Article
spelling doaj-51fe9aab69f841a4802ff51c90a6e0172020-11-25T00:24:47ZengBMCBMC Bioinformatics1471-21052007-03-01817410.1186/1471-2105-8-74Gene selection with multiple ordering criteriaTzeng ShengLiTsai Chen-AnChen James JChen Chun-Houh<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>A microarray study may select different differentially expressed gene sets because of different selection criteria. For example, the fold-change and p-value are two commonly known criteria to select differentially expressed genes under two experimental conditions. These two selection criteria often result in incompatible selected gene sets. Also, in a two-factor, say, treatment by time experiment, the investigator may be interested in one gene list that responds to both treatment and time effects.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We propose three layer ranking algorithms, point-admissible, line-admissible (convex), and Pareto, to provide a preference gene list from multiple gene lists generated by different ranking criteria. Using the public colon data as an example, the layer ranking algorithms are applied to the three univariate ranking criteria, fold-change, p-value, and frequency of selections by the SVM-RFE classifier. A simulation experiment shows that for experiments with small or moderate sample sizes (less than 20 per group) and detecting a 4-fold change or less, the two-dimensional (p-value and fold-change) convex layer ranking selects differentially expressed genes with generally lower FDR and higher power than the standard p-value ranking. Three applications are presented. The first application illustrates a use of the layer rankings to potentially improve predictive accuracy. The second application illustrates an application to a two-factor experiment involving two dose levels and two time points. The layer rankings are applied to selecting differentially expressed genes relating to the dose and time effects. In the third application, the layer rankings are applied to a benchmark data set consisting of three dilution concentrations to provide a ranking system from a long list of differentially expressed genes generated from the three dilution concentrations.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The layer ranking algorithms are useful to help investigators in selecting the most promising genes from multiple gene lists generated by different filter, normalization, or analysis methods for various objectives.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/8/74
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tzeng ShengLi
Tsai Chen-An
Chen James J
Chen Chun-Houh
spellingShingle Tzeng ShengLi
Tsai Chen-An
Chen James J
Chen Chun-Houh
Gene selection with multiple ordering criteria
BMC Bioinformatics
author_facet Tzeng ShengLi
Tsai Chen-An
Chen James J
Chen Chun-Houh
author_sort Tzeng ShengLi
title Gene selection with multiple ordering criteria
title_short Gene selection with multiple ordering criteria
title_full Gene selection with multiple ordering criteria
title_fullStr Gene selection with multiple ordering criteria
title_full_unstemmed Gene selection with multiple ordering criteria
title_sort gene selection with multiple ordering criteria
publisher BMC
series BMC Bioinformatics
issn 1471-2105
publishDate 2007-03-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>A microarray study may select different differentially expressed gene sets because of different selection criteria. For example, the fold-change and p-value are two commonly known criteria to select differentially expressed genes under two experimental conditions. These two selection criteria often result in incompatible selected gene sets. Also, in a two-factor, say, treatment by time experiment, the investigator may be interested in one gene list that responds to both treatment and time effects.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We propose three layer ranking algorithms, point-admissible, line-admissible (convex), and Pareto, to provide a preference gene list from multiple gene lists generated by different ranking criteria. Using the public colon data as an example, the layer ranking algorithms are applied to the three univariate ranking criteria, fold-change, p-value, and frequency of selections by the SVM-RFE classifier. A simulation experiment shows that for experiments with small or moderate sample sizes (less than 20 per group) and detecting a 4-fold change or less, the two-dimensional (p-value and fold-change) convex layer ranking selects differentially expressed genes with generally lower FDR and higher power than the standard p-value ranking. Three applications are presented. The first application illustrates a use of the layer rankings to potentially improve predictive accuracy. The second application illustrates an application to a two-factor experiment involving two dose levels and two time points. The layer rankings are applied to selecting differentially expressed genes relating to the dose and time effects. In the third application, the layer rankings are applied to a benchmark data set consisting of three dilution concentrations to provide a ranking system from a long list of differentially expressed genes generated from the three dilution concentrations.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The layer ranking algorithms are useful to help investigators in selecting the most promising genes from multiple gene lists generated by different filter, normalization, or analysis methods for various objectives.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/8/74
work_keys_str_mv AT tzengshengli geneselectionwithmultipleorderingcriteria
AT tsaichenan geneselectionwithmultipleorderingcriteria
AT chenjamesj geneselectionwithmultipleorderingcriteria
AT chenchunhouh geneselectionwithmultipleorderingcriteria
_version_ 1725351684827250688