Maternal morbidity at first repeat cesarean: a sub-analysis of Interceed™ barrier placed at primary cesarean section
Hector O Chapa, Gonzalo Venegas Women's Specialty Center Dallas, Chapa Medical Consulting, Dallas, TX, USA Objective: The aim of this study was to compare maternal morbidity at repeat cesarean section (CS) between use of a Gynecare Interceed™ Absorbable Adhesion Barrier (Gy...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Dove Medical Press
2013-02-01
|
Series: | Open Access Surgery |
Online Access: | http://www.dovepress.com/maternal-morbidity-at-first-repeat-cesarean-a-sub-analysis-of-intercee-a12171 |
id |
doaj-51effae33f4e439c903802dde7d67dcf |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-51effae33f4e439c903802dde7d67dcf2020-11-25T00:23:52ZengDove Medical PressOpen Access Surgery1178-70822013-02-012013default712Maternal morbidity at first repeat cesarean: a sub-analysis of Interceed™ barrier placed at primary cesarean sectionChapa HOVenegas GHector O Chapa, Gonzalo Venegas Women's Specialty Center Dallas, Chapa Medical Consulting, Dallas, TX, USA Objective: The aim of this study was to compare maternal morbidity at repeat cesarean section (CS) between use of a Gynecare Interceed™ Absorbable Adhesion Barrier (Gynecare, Somerville, NJ, USA) and non-use at primary cesarean delivery. Design: This was a retrospective study of patients in whom an absorbable adhesion barrier was/was not used at their primary CS. Methods: Mean and excessive blood loss, the need for adhesiolysis, and postoperative fever were compared between those in whom a barrier was used at first CS and those in whom a barrier was not used. Visceral injury at repeat cesarean was also compared between the two groups. Results: No statistically significant difference in mean blood loss was noted between the two groups. However, significantly more patients in whom a barrier was not used had excessive intraoperative blood loss (barrier group, 1/53 [1.9%]; no-barrier group, 6/59 [10.1%]; P = 0.04). All seven cases of excessive blood loss had adhesiolysis. Significantly more patients in the no-barrier group underwent adhesiolysis (no-barrier group, 35/59 [59.3%]; barrier group, 7/53 [13.2%]; P = 0.03). No statistical difference in postoperative metritis was noted (1/59 [1.8%] in the barrier group and 1/59 [1.7%] in the no-barrier group; P = 0.99). Only one deserosalization of the bladder dome occurred in a patient in the no-barrier group. Conclusion: Those in whom a barrier was not used at primary CS were more likely to have adhesiolysis and excessive blood loss (>1250 mL) at repeat CS. No significant difference in postoperative metritis/fever was noted between groups. Adhesion barrier at primary CS may reduce some aspects of maternal morbidity at repeat CS. Keywords: excessive blood loss, adhesiolysis, postoperative metritis, postoperative fever, visceral injuryhttp://www.dovepress.com/maternal-morbidity-at-first-repeat-cesarean-a-sub-analysis-of-intercee-a12171 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Chapa HO Venegas G |
spellingShingle |
Chapa HO Venegas G Maternal morbidity at first repeat cesarean: a sub-analysis of Interceed™ barrier placed at primary cesarean section Open Access Surgery |
author_facet |
Chapa HO Venegas G |
author_sort |
Chapa HO |
title |
Maternal morbidity at first repeat cesarean: a sub-analysis of Interceed™ barrier placed at primary cesarean section |
title_short |
Maternal morbidity at first repeat cesarean: a sub-analysis of Interceed™ barrier placed at primary cesarean section |
title_full |
Maternal morbidity at first repeat cesarean: a sub-analysis of Interceed™ barrier placed at primary cesarean section |
title_fullStr |
Maternal morbidity at first repeat cesarean: a sub-analysis of Interceed™ barrier placed at primary cesarean section |
title_full_unstemmed |
Maternal morbidity at first repeat cesarean: a sub-analysis of Interceed™ barrier placed at primary cesarean section |
title_sort |
maternal morbidity at first repeat cesarean: a sub-analysis of interceed™ barrier placed at primary cesarean section |
publisher |
Dove Medical Press |
series |
Open Access Surgery |
issn |
1178-7082 |
publishDate |
2013-02-01 |
description |
Hector O Chapa, Gonzalo Venegas Women's Specialty Center Dallas, Chapa Medical Consulting, Dallas, TX, USA Objective: The aim of this study was to compare maternal morbidity at repeat cesarean section (CS) between use of a Gynecare Interceed™ Absorbable Adhesion Barrier (Gynecare, Somerville, NJ, USA) and non-use at primary cesarean delivery. Design: This was a retrospective study of patients in whom an absorbable adhesion barrier was/was not used at their primary CS. Methods: Mean and excessive blood loss, the need for adhesiolysis, and postoperative fever were compared between those in whom a barrier was used at first CS and those in whom a barrier was not used. Visceral injury at repeat cesarean was also compared between the two groups. Results: No statistically significant difference in mean blood loss was noted between the two groups. However, significantly more patients in whom a barrier was not used had excessive intraoperative blood loss (barrier group, 1/53 [1.9%]; no-barrier group, 6/59 [10.1%]; P = 0.04). All seven cases of excessive blood loss had adhesiolysis. Significantly more patients in the no-barrier group underwent adhesiolysis (no-barrier group, 35/59 [59.3%]; barrier group, 7/53 [13.2%]; P = 0.03). No statistical difference in postoperative metritis was noted (1/59 [1.8%] in the barrier group and 1/59 [1.7%] in the no-barrier group; P = 0.99). Only one deserosalization of the bladder dome occurred in a patient in the no-barrier group. Conclusion: Those in whom a barrier was not used at primary CS were more likely to have adhesiolysis and excessive blood loss (>1250 mL) at repeat CS. No significant difference in postoperative metritis/fever was noted between groups. Adhesion barrier at primary CS may reduce some aspects of maternal morbidity at repeat CS. Keywords: excessive blood loss, adhesiolysis, postoperative metritis, postoperative fever, visceral injury |
url |
http://www.dovepress.com/maternal-morbidity-at-first-repeat-cesarean-a-sub-analysis-of-intercee-a12171 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT chapaho maternalmorbidityatfirstrepeatcesareanasubanalysisofinterceedamptradebarrierplacedatprimarycesareansection AT venegasg maternalmorbidityatfirstrepeatcesareanasubanalysisofinterceedamptradebarrierplacedatprimarycesareansection |
_version_ |
1725355218500059136 |