Getting to Common Ground: A Comparison of Ontario, Canada’s Provincial Policy Statement and the Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement with Respect to Indigenous Peoples
Indigenous rights are crucial to contemporary land use planning and policy in settler states. This article comparatively analyzes the manifest and latent content of the 2014 Provincial Policy Statement of Ontario, Canada (PPS) and the 1999 Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement of Aotearoa New Z...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cogitatio
2017-04-01
|
Series: | Urban Planning |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/850 |
id |
doaj-51e95f538ec044c4bac9b7dfcd341c58 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-51e95f538ec044c4bac9b7dfcd341c582020-11-25T00:33:03ZengCogitatioUrban Planning2183-76352017-04-0121728710.17645/up.v2i1.850473Getting to Common Ground: A Comparison of Ontario, Canada’s Provincial Policy Statement and the Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement with Respect to Indigenous PeoplesFraser McLeod0Leela Viswanathan1Jared Macbeth2Graham S. Whitelaw3School of Urban and Regional Planning, Queen’s University, CanadaDepartment of Geography and Planning, Queen’s University, CanadaWalpole Island First Nation Heritage Centre, CanadaSchool of Environmental Studies, Queen’s University, CanadaIndigenous rights are crucial to contemporary land use planning and policy in settler states. This article comparatively analyzes the manifest and latent content of the 2014 Provincial Policy Statement of Ontario, Canada (PPS) and the 1999 Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement of Aotearoa New Zealand (ACRPS) in order to evaluate their relative capacity to recognize the rights of Indigenous peoples. While the results show that jurisdiction is an impediment to fostering common ground between Indigenous peoples and settler states, the authors conclude that the PPS and the ACRPS serve vital roles in building dialogue and equitable planning outcomes.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/850AotearoaAucklandCanadacomparative policyIndigenousland use planning |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Fraser McLeod Leela Viswanathan Jared Macbeth Graham S. Whitelaw |
spellingShingle |
Fraser McLeod Leela Viswanathan Jared Macbeth Graham S. Whitelaw Getting to Common Ground: A Comparison of Ontario, Canada’s Provincial Policy Statement and the Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement with Respect to Indigenous Peoples Urban Planning Aotearoa Auckland Canada comparative policy Indigenous land use planning |
author_facet |
Fraser McLeod Leela Viswanathan Jared Macbeth Graham S. Whitelaw |
author_sort |
Fraser McLeod |
title |
Getting to Common Ground: A Comparison of Ontario, Canada’s Provincial Policy Statement and the Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement with Respect to Indigenous Peoples |
title_short |
Getting to Common Ground: A Comparison of Ontario, Canada’s Provincial Policy Statement and the Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement with Respect to Indigenous Peoples |
title_full |
Getting to Common Ground: A Comparison of Ontario, Canada’s Provincial Policy Statement and the Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement with Respect to Indigenous Peoples |
title_fullStr |
Getting to Common Ground: A Comparison of Ontario, Canada’s Provincial Policy Statement and the Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement with Respect to Indigenous Peoples |
title_full_unstemmed |
Getting to Common Ground: A Comparison of Ontario, Canada’s Provincial Policy Statement and the Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement with Respect to Indigenous Peoples |
title_sort |
getting to common ground: a comparison of ontario, canada’s provincial policy statement and the auckland council regional policy statement with respect to indigenous peoples |
publisher |
Cogitatio |
series |
Urban Planning |
issn |
2183-7635 |
publishDate |
2017-04-01 |
description |
Indigenous rights are crucial to contemporary land use planning and policy in settler states. This article comparatively analyzes the manifest and latent content of the 2014 Provincial Policy Statement of Ontario, Canada (PPS) and the 1999 Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement of Aotearoa New Zealand (ACRPS) in order to evaluate their relative capacity to recognize the rights of Indigenous peoples. While the results show that jurisdiction is an impediment to fostering common ground between Indigenous peoples and settler states, the authors conclude that the PPS and the ACRPS serve vital roles in building dialogue and equitable planning outcomes. |
topic |
Aotearoa Auckland Canada comparative policy Indigenous land use planning |
url |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/850 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT frasermcleod gettingtocommongroundacomparisonofontariocanadasprovincialpolicystatementandtheaucklandcouncilregionalpolicystatementwithrespecttoindigenouspeoples AT leelaviswanathan gettingtocommongroundacomparisonofontariocanadasprovincialpolicystatementandtheaucklandcouncilregionalpolicystatementwithrespecttoindigenouspeoples AT jaredmacbeth gettingtocommongroundacomparisonofontariocanadasprovincialpolicystatementandtheaucklandcouncilregionalpolicystatementwithrespecttoindigenouspeoples AT grahamswhitelaw gettingtocommongroundacomparisonofontariocanadasprovincialpolicystatementandtheaucklandcouncilregionalpolicystatementwithrespecttoindigenouspeoples |
_version_ |
1725317500638330880 |