Getting to Common Ground: A Comparison of Ontario, Canada’s Provincial Policy Statement and the Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement with Respect to Indigenous Peoples

Indigenous rights are crucial to contemporary land use planning and policy in settler states. This article comparatively analyzes the manifest and latent content of the 2014 Provincial Policy Statement of Ontario, Canada (PPS) and the 1999 Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement of Aotearoa New Z...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fraser McLeod, Leela Viswanathan, Jared Macbeth, Graham S. Whitelaw
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2017-04-01
Series:Urban Planning
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/850
id doaj-51e95f538ec044c4bac9b7dfcd341c58
record_format Article
spelling doaj-51e95f538ec044c4bac9b7dfcd341c582020-11-25T00:33:03ZengCogitatioUrban Planning2183-76352017-04-0121728710.17645/up.v2i1.850473Getting to Common Ground: A Comparison of Ontario, Canada’s Provincial Policy Statement and the Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement with Respect to Indigenous PeoplesFraser McLeod0Leela Viswanathan1Jared Macbeth2Graham S. Whitelaw3School of Urban and Regional Planning, Queen’s University, CanadaDepartment of Geography and Planning, Queen’s University, CanadaWalpole Island First Nation Heritage Centre, CanadaSchool of Environmental Studies, Queen’s University, CanadaIndigenous rights are crucial to contemporary land use planning and policy in settler states. This article comparatively analyzes the manifest and latent content of the 2014 Provincial Policy Statement of Ontario, Canada (PPS) and the 1999 Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement of Aotearoa New Zealand (ACRPS) in order to evaluate their relative capacity to recognize the rights of Indigenous peoples. While the results show that jurisdiction is an impediment to fostering common ground between Indigenous peoples and settler states, the authors conclude that the PPS and the ACRPS serve vital roles in building dialogue and equitable planning outcomes.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/850AotearoaAucklandCanadacomparative policyIndigenousland use planning
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fraser McLeod
Leela Viswanathan
Jared Macbeth
Graham S. Whitelaw
spellingShingle Fraser McLeod
Leela Viswanathan
Jared Macbeth
Graham S. Whitelaw
Getting to Common Ground: A Comparison of Ontario, Canada’s Provincial Policy Statement and the Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement with Respect to Indigenous Peoples
Urban Planning
Aotearoa
Auckland
Canada
comparative policy
Indigenous
land use planning
author_facet Fraser McLeod
Leela Viswanathan
Jared Macbeth
Graham S. Whitelaw
author_sort Fraser McLeod
title Getting to Common Ground: A Comparison of Ontario, Canada’s Provincial Policy Statement and the Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement with Respect to Indigenous Peoples
title_short Getting to Common Ground: A Comparison of Ontario, Canada’s Provincial Policy Statement and the Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement with Respect to Indigenous Peoples
title_full Getting to Common Ground: A Comparison of Ontario, Canada’s Provincial Policy Statement and the Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement with Respect to Indigenous Peoples
title_fullStr Getting to Common Ground: A Comparison of Ontario, Canada’s Provincial Policy Statement and the Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement with Respect to Indigenous Peoples
title_full_unstemmed Getting to Common Ground: A Comparison of Ontario, Canada’s Provincial Policy Statement and the Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement with Respect to Indigenous Peoples
title_sort getting to common ground: a comparison of ontario, canada’s provincial policy statement and the auckland council regional policy statement with respect to indigenous peoples
publisher Cogitatio
series Urban Planning
issn 2183-7635
publishDate 2017-04-01
description Indigenous rights are crucial to contemporary land use planning and policy in settler states. This article comparatively analyzes the manifest and latent content of the 2014 Provincial Policy Statement of Ontario, Canada (PPS) and the 1999 Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement of Aotearoa New Zealand (ACRPS) in order to evaluate their relative capacity to recognize the rights of Indigenous peoples. While the results show that jurisdiction is an impediment to fostering common ground between Indigenous peoples and settler states, the authors conclude that the PPS and the ACRPS serve vital roles in building dialogue and equitable planning outcomes.
topic Aotearoa
Auckland
Canada
comparative policy
Indigenous
land use planning
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/850
work_keys_str_mv AT frasermcleod gettingtocommongroundacomparisonofontariocanadasprovincialpolicystatementandtheaucklandcouncilregionalpolicystatementwithrespecttoindigenouspeoples
AT leelaviswanathan gettingtocommongroundacomparisonofontariocanadasprovincialpolicystatementandtheaucklandcouncilregionalpolicystatementwithrespecttoindigenouspeoples
AT jaredmacbeth gettingtocommongroundacomparisonofontariocanadasprovincialpolicystatementandtheaucklandcouncilregionalpolicystatementwithrespecttoindigenouspeoples
AT grahamswhitelaw gettingtocommongroundacomparisonofontariocanadasprovincialpolicystatementandtheaucklandcouncilregionalpolicystatementwithrespecttoindigenouspeoples
_version_ 1725317500638330880