Adverbial stance marking in the introduction and conclusion sections of legal research articles

<p class="Abstract"><span lang="EN-GB">Although scientific research articles have traditionally been taken as examples of an objective style of writing that aims to minimise researchers’ voices in their texts (Gilbert and Mulkay, 1984:42), authors inevitably adopt sta...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Heather Adams, Elena Quintana-Toledo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad Politécnica de Valencia 2013-07-01
Series:Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas
Subjects:
Online Access:http://polipapers.upv.es/index.php/rdlyla/article/view/1028
id doaj-51e63296bf5146e1aeb7d21b80987211
record_format Article
spelling doaj-51e63296bf5146e1aeb7d21b809872112020-11-25T01:44:01ZengUniversidad Politécnica de ValenciaRevista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas1886-24381886-62982013-07-0180132210.4995/rlyla.2013.1028Adverbial stance marking in the introduction and conclusion sections of legal research articlesHeather AdamsElena Quintana-Toledo<p class="Abstract"><span lang="EN-GB">Although scientific research articles have traditionally been taken as examples of an objective style of writing that aims to minimise researchers’ voices in their texts (Gilbert and Mulkay, 1984:42), authors inevitably adopt stances towards the information presented and the target audience when writing their papers. This article explores authorial stance as expressed by adverbial markers in the introduction and conclusion sections of legal research papers. Following Biber et al. (1999), and Conrad and Biber (1999), our aim is to identify the most frequent adverbial markers of stance present in each section as indicators of (i) epistemicity, (ii) attitude, and (iii) style. We will try to show whether or not there are functional differences in the use of adverbial stance markers, and whether or not these are derived from the different communicative purposes of these sections</span><span lang="EN-GB">.</span></p>http://polipapers.upv.es/index.php/rdlyla/article/view/1028adverbial stance markersattitudeepistemicstyleintroductionconclusionresearch article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Heather Adams
Elena Quintana-Toledo
spellingShingle Heather Adams
Elena Quintana-Toledo
Adverbial stance marking in the introduction and conclusion sections of legal research articles
Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas
adverbial stance markers
attitude
epistemic
style
introduction
conclusion
research article
author_facet Heather Adams
Elena Quintana-Toledo
author_sort Heather Adams
title Adverbial stance marking in the introduction and conclusion sections of legal research articles
title_short Adverbial stance marking in the introduction and conclusion sections of legal research articles
title_full Adverbial stance marking in the introduction and conclusion sections of legal research articles
title_fullStr Adverbial stance marking in the introduction and conclusion sections of legal research articles
title_full_unstemmed Adverbial stance marking in the introduction and conclusion sections of legal research articles
title_sort adverbial stance marking in the introduction and conclusion sections of legal research articles
publisher Universidad Politécnica de Valencia
series Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas
issn 1886-2438
1886-6298
publishDate 2013-07-01
description <p class="Abstract"><span lang="EN-GB">Although scientific research articles have traditionally been taken as examples of an objective style of writing that aims to minimise researchers’ voices in their texts (Gilbert and Mulkay, 1984:42), authors inevitably adopt stances towards the information presented and the target audience when writing their papers. This article explores authorial stance as expressed by adverbial markers in the introduction and conclusion sections of legal research papers. Following Biber et al. (1999), and Conrad and Biber (1999), our aim is to identify the most frequent adverbial markers of stance present in each section as indicators of (i) epistemicity, (ii) attitude, and (iii) style. We will try to show whether or not there are functional differences in the use of adverbial stance markers, and whether or not these are derived from the different communicative purposes of these sections</span><span lang="EN-GB">.</span></p>
topic adverbial stance markers
attitude
epistemic
style
introduction
conclusion
research article
url http://polipapers.upv.es/index.php/rdlyla/article/view/1028
work_keys_str_mv AT heatheradams adverbialstancemarkingintheintroductionandconclusionsectionsoflegalresearcharticles
AT elenaquintanatoledo adverbialstancemarkingintheintroductionandconclusionsectionsoflegalresearcharticles
_version_ 1725030302589386752