A Simplified Model to Assess the Influence of the Configuration of Commercial Aircraft on Boarding and Deboarding

This paper presents an evaluation of the influence of aircraft configuration on the boarding and deboarding times using a simplified model and computer simulation. Boarding and deboarding times are important to airlines since both procedures are part of the critical path of the turnaround time (TAT)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Diogo B. P. de Oliveira, Jonathan N. Coelho, Alison de O. Moraes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2021-01-01
Series:International Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8872992
id doaj-51d37aa0474140a4bc4d221fb069e2b2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-51d37aa0474140a4bc4d221fb069e2b22021-02-22T00:00:20ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Aerospace Engineering1687-59742021-01-01202110.1155/2021/8872992A Simplified Model to Assess the Influence of the Configuration of Commercial Aircraft on Boarding and DeboardingDiogo B. P. de Oliveira0Jonathan N. Coelho1Alison de O. Moraes2ITAITAIAEThis paper presents an evaluation of the influence of aircraft configuration on the boarding and deboarding times using a simplified model and computer simulation. Boarding and deboarding times are important to airlines since both procedures are part of the critical path of the turnaround time (TAT) of aircraft in airports. During the TAT, a series of activities are performed in the aircraft in order to prepare it for the next flight. A reduction in boarding and deboarding times may represent a reduction in TAT for airlines. For the comparisons, three aircraft configurations are used: single aisle 3×3 (“six abreast”), single aisle 3×2 (“five abreast”), and single aisle 2×2 (“four abreast”), all with the same number of passengers. For the boarding analyses, two boarding procedures are used: random and random outside-in. The 2×2 aircraft interior configuration holds the shortest boarding times; deboarding times are similar for the three configurations. Also, a sensitivity analysis is carried out, and the results show that the higher the aircraft occupancy and the number of passengers with carry-on baggage, the higher are boarding and deboarding times, with the 2×2 having the lowest times in comparison with the other two configurations.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8872992
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Diogo B. P. de Oliveira
Jonathan N. Coelho
Alison de O. Moraes
spellingShingle Diogo B. P. de Oliveira
Jonathan N. Coelho
Alison de O. Moraes
A Simplified Model to Assess the Influence of the Configuration of Commercial Aircraft on Boarding and Deboarding
International Journal of Aerospace Engineering
author_facet Diogo B. P. de Oliveira
Jonathan N. Coelho
Alison de O. Moraes
author_sort Diogo B. P. de Oliveira
title A Simplified Model to Assess the Influence of the Configuration of Commercial Aircraft on Boarding and Deboarding
title_short A Simplified Model to Assess the Influence of the Configuration of Commercial Aircraft on Boarding and Deboarding
title_full A Simplified Model to Assess the Influence of the Configuration of Commercial Aircraft on Boarding and Deboarding
title_fullStr A Simplified Model to Assess the Influence of the Configuration of Commercial Aircraft on Boarding and Deboarding
title_full_unstemmed A Simplified Model to Assess the Influence of the Configuration of Commercial Aircraft on Boarding and Deboarding
title_sort simplified model to assess the influence of the configuration of commercial aircraft on boarding and deboarding
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Aerospace Engineering
issn 1687-5974
publishDate 2021-01-01
description This paper presents an evaluation of the influence of aircraft configuration on the boarding and deboarding times using a simplified model and computer simulation. Boarding and deboarding times are important to airlines since both procedures are part of the critical path of the turnaround time (TAT) of aircraft in airports. During the TAT, a series of activities are performed in the aircraft in order to prepare it for the next flight. A reduction in boarding and deboarding times may represent a reduction in TAT for airlines. For the comparisons, three aircraft configurations are used: single aisle 3×3 (“six abreast”), single aisle 3×2 (“five abreast”), and single aisle 2×2 (“four abreast”), all with the same number of passengers. For the boarding analyses, two boarding procedures are used: random and random outside-in. The 2×2 aircraft interior configuration holds the shortest boarding times; deboarding times are similar for the three configurations. Also, a sensitivity analysis is carried out, and the results show that the higher the aircraft occupancy and the number of passengers with carry-on baggage, the higher are boarding and deboarding times, with the 2×2 having the lowest times in comparison with the other two configurations.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8872992
work_keys_str_mv AT diogobpdeoliveira asimplifiedmodeltoassesstheinfluenceoftheconfigurationofcommercialaircraftonboardinganddeboarding
AT jonathanncoelho asimplifiedmodeltoassesstheinfluenceoftheconfigurationofcommercialaircraftonboardinganddeboarding
AT alisondeomoraes asimplifiedmodeltoassesstheinfluenceoftheconfigurationofcommercialaircraftonboardinganddeboarding
AT diogobpdeoliveira simplifiedmodeltoassesstheinfluenceoftheconfigurationofcommercialaircraftonboardinganddeboarding
AT jonathanncoelho simplifiedmodeltoassesstheinfluenceoftheconfigurationofcommercialaircraftonboardinganddeboarding
AT alisondeomoraes simplifiedmodeltoassesstheinfluenceoftheconfigurationofcommercialaircraftonboardinganddeboarding
_version_ 1714853152212123648