Dead wood and stand structure - relationships for forest plots across Europe

Dead wood and stand structural parameters were sampled in eleven countries using standardized methods at about 90 intensive forest monitoring sites across large parts of Europe. Besides descriptions and correlation analyses of dead wood and stand structure parameters, a joint evaluation of both fiel...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seidling W, Travaglini D, Meyer P, Waldner P, Fischer R, Granke O, Chirici G, Corona P
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology (SISEF) 2014-10-01
Series:iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://iforest.sisef.org/contents/?id=ifor1057-007
id doaj-51c81ca64d78412aa4eecddaffa0efa1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-51c81ca64d78412aa4eecddaffa0efa12020-11-24T21:25:53ZengItalian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology (SISEF)iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry1971-74581971-74582014-10-017126928110.3832/ifor1057-0071057Dead wood and stand structure - relationships for forest plots across EuropeSeidling W0Travaglini D1Meyer P2Waldner P3Fischer R4Granke O5Chirici G6Corona P7Thünen Institute of Forest Ecosystems, Eberswalde (Germany)Dipartimento di Gestione dei Sistemi Agrari, Alimentari e Forestali, University of Florence (Italy)Northwest-German Forestry Research Station, Goettingen (Germany)WSL, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research, Birmensdorf (Switzerland)Thünen Institute of International Forestry and Forest Economics, Hamburg (Germany)DigSyLand, Husby (Germany)Dipartimento di Bioscienze e Territorio, University of Molise, Pesche (Italy)Consiglio per la ricerca e la sperimentazione in agricoltura, Forestry Research Centre, Arezzo (Italy)Dead wood and stand structural parameters were sampled in eleven countries using standardized methods at about 90 intensive forest monitoring sites across large parts of Europe. Besides descriptions and correlation analyses of dead wood and stand structure parameters, a joint evaluation of both fields was performed by principal component analysis (PCA). The extracted principal components were subsequently regressed against important numerical and categorical site-related parameters like soil pH, altitude, or forest type. Dead wood volumes varied largely across plots, however, 77 percent of them had volumes below 25 cubic meter per hectare. While all fractions of dead wood - except cut stumps - reveal high intercorrelation, different aspects of stand structure varied more independently. Clark-Evans index, number of tree species and standard deviation of tree trunk diameters revealed as most self-contained. The 1st PCA axis covered 46 percent of the total variance and was mostly loaded by total dead wood volume denoting it as the feature differentiating forests most. The 2nd axis was primarily loaded by tree species diversity together with stem density and the Clark-Evans index. On the 3rd axis diameter differentiation of trees together with the volume of cut stumps prevailed, while the 4th was mainly related to the decay class of woody debris. Bivariate ex post analyses revealed country as a significant predictor of all PCA axes, underlining national forest legislations and management rules as crucial for all investigated structural features of forests. Forest type was related only to the 3rd and 2nd axis. Only the 3rd axis revealed significant relationships with some ecological site factors (age, number of tree layers, latitude, altitude). The outcome underlines the significance of nationally enacted forest legislations for both important structural and biodiversity-relevant features of forest ecosystems and encourages similar approaches with data from national forest inventories or monitoring systems.https://iforest.sisef.org/contents/?id=ifor1057-007Structural DiversityPrinciple Component AnalysisForest MonitoringICP ForestsForestBIOTA
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Seidling W
Travaglini D
Meyer P
Waldner P
Fischer R
Granke O
Chirici G
Corona P
spellingShingle Seidling W
Travaglini D
Meyer P
Waldner P
Fischer R
Granke O
Chirici G
Corona P
Dead wood and stand structure - relationships for forest plots across Europe
iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry
Structural Diversity
Principle Component Analysis
Forest Monitoring
ICP Forests
ForestBIOTA
author_facet Seidling W
Travaglini D
Meyer P
Waldner P
Fischer R
Granke O
Chirici G
Corona P
author_sort Seidling W
title Dead wood and stand structure - relationships for forest plots across Europe
title_short Dead wood and stand structure - relationships for forest plots across Europe
title_full Dead wood and stand structure - relationships for forest plots across Europe
title_fullStr Dead wood and stand structure - relationships for forest plots across Europe
title_full_unstemmed Dead wood and stand structure - relationships for forest plots across Europe
title_sort dead wood and stand structure - relationships for forest plots across europe
publisher Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology (SISEF)
series iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry
issn 1971-7458
1971-7458
publishDate 2014-10-01
description Dead wood and stand structural parameters were sampled in eleven countries using standardized methods at about 90 intensive forest monitoring sites across large parts of Europe. Besides descriptions and correlation analyses of dead wood and stand structure parameters, a joint evaluation of both fields was performed by principal component analysis (PCA). The extracted principal components were subsequently regressed against important numerical and categorical site-related parameters like soil pH, altitude, or forest type. Dead wood volumes varied largely across plots, however, 77 percent of them had volumes below 25 cubic meter per hectare. While all fractions of dead wood - except cut stumps - reveal high intercorrelation, different aspects of stand structure varied more independently. Clark-Evans index, number of tree species and standard deviation of tree trunk diameters revealed as most self-contained. The 1st PCA axis covered 46 percent of the total variance and was mostly loaded by total dead wood volume denoting it as the feature differentiating forests most. The 2nd axis was primarily loaded by tree species diversity together with stem density and the Clark-Evans index. On the 3rd axis diameter differentiation of trees together with the volume of cut stumps prevailed, while the 4th was mainly related to the decay class of woody debris. Bivariate ex post analyses revealed country as a significant predictor of all PCA axes, underlining national forest legislations and management rules as crucial for all investigated structural features of forests. Forest type was related only to the 3rd and 2nd axis. Only the 3rd axis revealed significant relationships with some ecological site factors (age, number of tree layers, latitude, altitude). The outcome underlines the significance of nationally enacted forest legislations for both important structural and biodiversity-relevant features of forest ecosystems and encourages similar approaches with data from national forest inventories or monitoring systems.
topic Structural Diversity
Principle Component Analysis
Forest Monitoring
ICP Forests
ForestBIOTA
url https://iforest.sisef.org/contents/?id=ifor1057-007
work_keys_str_mv AT seidlingw deadwoodandstandstructurerelationshipsforforestplotsacrosseurope
AT travaglinid deadwoodandstandstructurerelationshipsforforestplotsacrosseurope
AT meyerp deadwoodandstandstructurerelationshipsforforestplotsacrosseurope
AT waldnerp deadwoodandstandstructurerelationshipsforforestplotsacrosseurope
AT fischerr deadwoodandstandstructurerelationshipsforforestplotsacrosseurope
AT grankeo deadwoodandstandstructurerelationshipsforforestplotsacrosseurope
AT chiricig deadwoodandstandstructurerelationshipsforforestplotsacrosseurope
AT coronap deadwoodandstandstructurerelationshipsforforestplotsacrosseurope
_version_ 1725982211237216256